Lying when not necessary makes most wonder — but not the media

Jewish World Review ^ | March 25, 2004 | Jack Kelly

[dinasour]

That nasty, out of control FBI, watching people just because they've threatened to kill American political leaders. There won't be any more of that in a Kerry administration.

...and who are today carrying on that legacy by harassing and intimidating poor, peaceful, innocent Moose Limbs, who, like Kerry, are only trying to make the world a better place.

There won't be any more of that, either, in the Kerry administration.

[ex-Texan]

*BUMP*!

[not_apathetic_anymore]

Ouch! ROFLOL

[VadeRetro]

If Kerry were irritated with Camil for having proposed assassination, his ire faded over the years. Camil told the Lipscomb that he plans to accept an offer from the Florida Kerry organization to become active in Kerry's presidential campaign.

A volunteer position or a well-paid one, I wonder?

[formercalifornian]

That was Jack Kelley with an "e"

[Arrowhead1952]

With the evidence mounting that he had indeed been at the Kansas City meeting, Kerry changed his story.

Who'da thunk it? The old flip flopper is at it again. Just like el dicko clarke changed his story, and the media reports what they want us to hear.

[formercalifornian]

Jack Kelley

[SJackson]

That's Jack Kelley.

From JWR and the Washington Times who carry his editorials

Jack Kelly, a syndicated columnist, is a former Marine and Green Beret and a former deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force in the Reagan administration. He is national security writer for the Pittsburgh (Pa.) Post-Gazette.

[monocle]

If Kerry's memory is so deficient, he should refrain from prevaricating.

[backhoe]

Cross-link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1104239/posts
Kansas City Kerry- "The Phoenix Project"
various FR links | 03-24-04 | The Heavy Equipment Guy

[the Real fifi]

No.

[Republic Rocker]

The LA TIMES version of this story was just as much a cover up for Kerry as it was trash for the reader..

[Sabertooth]

Since Kerry was on the side of the angels in the debate, and Sens. John Tower (R-Tex), John Stennis (D-Miss) and Strom Thurmond (R-SC) may have had their lives prolonged because of him, it is unclear why Kerry would choose to lie about his participation in it. Perhaps Kerry felt some voters would look askance at his leadership role in an organization that would seriously contemplate assassination, or was worried that voters would think him remiss for failing to report to the authorities that there were some in the VVAW who were plotting murder.

Because as recently released FBI files "clearing" Kerry and the VVAW of links to violent activity now prove, they could have only been cleared of those links if Kerry failed to inform the authorites of the Senatorial Assassination plot.

Or, maybe Senator Kerry doesn't want questions raised about the shooting of Senator John C. Stennis outside his the latter's home on January 30th, 1973?

[SJackson]

Thanks. Interesting thread you linked.

[lainde]

bttt