Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Clarke doesn't say what a person has said that's damning, he tells what he thinks they were thinking that was damning.

For instance, if Condi turned and said "nice day", most folks would take her words at face value and assume she meant 'nice day'. Clark would ignore the words, look at her expression or her eyebrows, or whatever and "read" bizarre false meaning into her comment.

Clark might say, "she said 'nice day', but I could tell she wanted to tell me she didn't understand her job". Or that "she wanted to fly" or whatever. In other words, Clark doesn't tell us about Condi, he tells us his own projections.

44 posted on 03/24/2004 9:20:14 PM PST by GOPJ (NFL Owners: Grown men don't watch hollywood peep shows with wives and children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GOPJ
There was already a Congressional Hearing on this matter.

Based on the fact of the 60 min expose, the book being (amazingly) available for the hearing folks, the use of it as the "bible" for the commission and the early release of the book, I think we can infer that this was a setup. Now, let's see who was screaming for an independent commission.

45 posted on 03/25/2004 6:00:13 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson