To: finnman69
It was one thing when Rush was talking about this today...but when the liberal news network is on it--the jig is up.
Give it up Clark, it's over.
The only thing left to hear from you is were you lying then--or are you lying now?
3 posted on
03/24/2004 3:12:59 PM PST by
ElephantMan
(sorry, no smart a$$ tag line today)
To: ElephantMan
Mr. Clarke made assertions that we have said are flat-out wrong, and it's important for the American people to have the facts," McClellan said. "Mr. Clarke certainly decided on his own to go ahead and reveal conversations that were considered private previously."
You listening, Mr. Kerrey?
52 posted on
03/24/2004 3:40:37 PM PST by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
To: ElephantMan
They can't afford to just say "provides a point by point rebuttal". They should say each point. I.e. you said there was no plan left by the old team. Is this true or is it false? You said nothing had happened on the outstanding issues since 1998? Is this true or is this false? You said Bush ordered the policy change from gradual rollback over 5 years to rapid elimination? Is this true...
Because I swear to you, the media is playing this as though we can't read. They know by now that it isn't true and won't fly with anyone who does read, but they are not admitting it or backing off. They are spinning for their own skulls full of mush who will not even look at the document, and who will depend instead entirely on press flack spin. Which is, DNC talking point, if anybody shows they are baldly lying to our faces, why that is ferocious and partisan and meanspirited, isn't it?
119 posted on
03/24/2004 4:35:15 PM PST by
JasonC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson