Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clarke contrasts Bush, Clinton terror priorities (BARF Alert)
Sac Bee ^ | 3/24/04 | Hope Yen - AP

Posted on 03/24/2004 12:45:58 PM PST by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/12/2004 6:07:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON (AP) - The government's former top counterterrorism adviser testified Wednesday that the Clinton administration had "no higher priority" than combatting terrorists while the Bush administration made it "an important issue but not an urgent issue."

Richard Clarke told a bipartisan commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that "although I continued to say it (terrorism) was an urgent problem I don't think it was ever treated that way" by the current administration in advance of the strikes two and a half years ago.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; bush; clarke; clinton; contrasts; priorities; richardclarke; terror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: cwb
Can anyone tell me this, what specifically is Clarke saying that the Bush Administration did wrong? All I have heard him say was that for Klinton terrorism was the #1 priority (this is easily proved false), and for Bush is was less so. What does that mean? Was there any specific thing that Klinton was doing right that Bush discontinued? That seems to be a pretty basic question that has not been answered.
21 posted on 03/24/2004 1:24:19 PM PST by ottothedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ottothedog
This is the sad thing. Most of his criticisms of Bush are made in his book. Even today, while he chastised everyone in regards to failing, he didn't come off nearly as embittered as he did in his book. His main problem is that "he" thinks Bush's war in Iraq took away from "his" war on terror. Even one of the Republicans made mention about how his demeanor at both this hearing and an earlier joint committee hearing were far different from what he's saying in his book. Lehman, asked if he (or his publisher) wasn't being disingenuous with these charges so he could sell his book...bringing up 60 Minutes and the release date, timed to coincide with this hearing.
22 posted on 03/24/2004 1:36:19 PM PST by cwb (Kerry: The only person who could make Bill Clinton look like a moderate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cwb
So basically the only *actual* criticism that he has is that he disagrees with taking out Saddam? His only criticism then is not even relevant to preventing 9/11. One guy has a disagreement w/ the Bush Admininstration over whether Saddam should have been left in power, and there is all this furor. I don't get it.
23 posted on 03/24/2004 1:47:48 PM PST by ottothedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson