To: hope
In fairness to Isikoff, he probably hasn't read the transcript or heard the words of Clarke. Once he does, let's see if it influences his opinion.
Also, Rush said the omission of this important development by CNN/CBS/ABC/NBC/et al is actually good for our side. It demonstrates how bad they are losing since is shows how far they will compromise their "profession" to smear a President they hate.
386 posted on
03/24/2004 10:08:54 AM PST by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
In fairness to Isikoff, he probably hasn't read the transcript or heard the words of Clarke. Once he does, let's see if it influences his opinion. That seems unlikely given that he was interviewed on Fox right after their playing the background interview.
397 posted on
03/24/2004 10:11:49 AM PST by
CedarDave
(Election 2004: When Democrats attack, it's campaigning; when Republicans campaign, it's attacking.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"In fairness to Isikoff, he probably hasn't read the transcript or heard the words of Clarke. Once he does, let's see if it influences his opinion."
You gotta be kidding? Isikoff the reporter who sat on the Monica Lewisnky story...please...besides he should have not tried so hard at spinning this away from Clarke until he heard the tape..
405 posted on
03/24/2004 10:13:27 AM PST by
hope
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I don't think the bias of the mainstream media has ever been QUITE as blatant as it's been in the last few days...it's as though they completely don't care about even the pretense of objectivity anymore.
408 posted on
03/24/2004 10:14:24 AM PST by
GOPrincess
(Jim Angle...My Hero!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson