[JohnGalt]

Typically, the art of subtlety would be to let that come out during Congressional testimony. Orchestrating this critique in the press the day he is suppose to testify makes it look like the President fears what Clarke has to say.

[Wolfstar]

Typically, the art of subtlety would be to let that come out during Congressional testimony. Orchestrating this critique in the press the day he is suppose to testify makes it look like the President fears what Clarke has to say.

Horse puckey! This is no time for "the art of subtlety." For one thing, the media will not bother to report anything too subtle for their biased peabrains to pick up.

For another, a lie left on the table when it can be refuted is a lie given unnecessary credence. Have you ever heard the truism that the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing?

The international and domestic Left is coming at this President and administration (and, by extension, all of us) with sledgehammers on as many fronts as they can open up. The last thing we should be doing is pulling our own punches in this very deadly struggle.

[ravingnutter]

Typically, the art of subtlety would be to let that come out during Congressional testimony.

Oh and just how would the commission come across this conflicting interview if Jim Angle had not dug it up and publicized it? Subtlety my butt...get over yourself, you haven't got a clue. What a maroon...

[justshutupandtakeit]

Another post from you, another LIE.

There is no "orchestrating" the Angle story. He was at the interview and, thus, KNEW Clarke was lying but since you live to LIE you can't admit this.

Bush has played this whole thing BRILLIANTLY. His fantastic team has kicked your lying friend's ass six ways from Sunday just as it has with AQ, Iraq and the DNC.