Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mo1
I called too. Thanks for the number. I told her my disgust and she asked me if I would like to email them too. I said, 'Sure.'

Here is the email address: info@9-11commission.gov

I asked her what the percentage of for or against todays theatrics was and she said she didn't know other than they were getting lots of calls like mine.
2,874 posted on 03/24/2004 2:23:55 PM PST by abner (FREE THE MIRANDA MEMOS! http://www.intelmemo.com or http://www.wintersoldier.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2862 | View Replies ]


To: abner
Thanks

Here is the email address: info@9-11commission.gov

2,883 posted on 03/24/2004 2:28:45 PM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2874 | View Replies ]

To: abner
Thank you, zipped off an email!
2,885 posted on 03/24/2004 2:29:07 PM PST by GOPrincess (Jim Angle...My Hero!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2874 | View Replies ]

To: abner
Thanks for the email address.

Why don't you post a Vanity and give the phone # and email address for other freepers?
2,894 posted on 03/24/2004 2:33:12 PM PST by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ( President Bush 3-20-04))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2874 | View Replies ]

To: abner
Thank you for the link, abner. It made it very convenient to send an e-mail of complaint about the bald display of partisanship I saw today.
2,934 posted on 03/24/2004 2:57:13 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2874 | View Replies ]

To: abner
Here is the email I sent to the 9-11 commission.

...

I have watched the hearing for the last 2 days. I am very disgusted at the partisanship shown by several members of the committee. Today one member brought up an interview Clark gave a year or so ago, that totally contradicted his testimony. Only 2-3 of the members actually followed up with Clark about this. I was stunned that several of the member seemed to be trying to defend Clark. I think it was Kerry that actually attacked the news source. I thought they were trying to get to the truth, not where the source was. Tell Kerry his comments were unprofessional and disgusting. To me, it seems as if 4-5 of the member have already made up their minds. It looks as if they are trying to blame president Bush. They must remember this is very important. We lost 3,000 US citizens on 9-11. We are STILL at war. I cannot believe how some of these members seem to be attacking Bush during a time of war. I will be honest. After the last 2 days, I have no confidence that this commission will get to the root of the problem. I believe whatever report will come down to partisanship by the members. Please tell them all, that a good part of America is ashamed of how they are acting. This comission will be dismissed as irrelevant my most of America I am afraid.

3,058 posted on 03/24/2004 4:58:32 PM PST by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2874 | View Replies ]

To: abner
Thanks for the e-mail address for the 9-11 Commission. I just e-mailed the following to them, my two Senators and Rep:

The Chairman of the 9-11 Commission:

I am writing to complain about the obvious partisanship by some members of your "commission". Several members seem more intent on blaming President Bush and his administration, than learning lessons that will help protect American citizens today and in the future.

When is the Commission going to examine the law that forbid the sharing of information and intelligence between the CIA and the FBI? Who was responsible for the passage of that idiotic piece of legislation?

When is the Commission going to examine why human intelligence by the CIA was, at best, downgraded, at worst, gutted? I'd like to know the names of those responsible for crippling our ability to have eyes and ears on the ground on a global basis.

Dr. Rice has provided over four hours of private testimony to this commission. Yet, several members, through snide remarks and innuendo, keep insinuating that since she has not testified in the public phase of your investigation, she must have something to hide.

If you need names, they are Roemer, Gorelick, and Ben Vineste (sp). The last two have direct connection to the Clinton Administration. Why were they allowed to serve on this so-called fact finding commission? And why have they been allowed to continue to take cheap shots at Dr. Rice, and by association, the Bush Administration?

I would rate the Commission's performance so far, a K… K for Kangaroo. Your job is too important to America's future to allow partisan grandstanding, from your members, or from the audience.

I suggest the Commission clean up its act. I am one American who believes America deserves better.
--
God Bless America,

Name
Address
City, State

P.S. I have one question for the Commission's "star" witness. Ask Richard Clarke this: if he has been truthful in the past, how can his testimony today be judged to be truthful? He seems to be contradicting himself. In some circles, that's known as lying.
3,151 posted on 03/24/2004 9:13:07 PM PST by auboy (The Rats' new math: 8 months = 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2874 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson