Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Bush administration, help from an unlikely source
Newsday ^ | 03/23/04 | KEN FIREMAN

Posted on 03/23/2004 7:01:24 PM PST by Pikamax

For Bush administration, help from an unlikely source

BY KEN FIREMAN WASHINGTON BUREAU

March 23, 2004, 8:54 PM EST

WASHINGTON -- When it really needed it, the beleaguered Bush administration found some succor Tuesday from an unlikely and potentially dangerous source: the commission investigating the 9/11 terror attacks.

Just as the administration was launching a frantic effort to fend off the allegations of former White House counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke that it failed to take al-Qaida seriously before 9/11, the commission delivered a couple of priceless gifts.

The first was a new staff report revealing that the previous administration -- the one headed by some guy named Clinton -- had three opportunities in 1998 and 1999 to launch lethal strikes at Osama bin Laden but failed to pull the trigger. Each time, according to the report, senior officials overruled field operatives on the grounds that the intel was uncertain and the risk of "collateral damage" great.

The second came from two of those Clinton-era officials, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and Defense Secretary William Cohen. Both responded to pointed questions from panel members about why they had not sought to attack al-Qaida more aggressively by pleading that the pre-9/11 political climate simply would not have supported such a policy.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; albright; alqaeda; bush43; obl; richardclarke; williamcohen; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 03/23/2004 7:01:27 PM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
The predictable result has been a furious onslaught aimed at discrediting Clarke and his account. Administration officials have simultaneously sought to portray Clarke as "out of the loop" and yet culpable for the failure to scotch the terrorist menace. They accuse him of hypocrisy for failing to raise his concerns while still in government, partisanship for making them now in an election year, and vindictiveness arising from the fact that he was demoted.

Clarke's response is that such attacks seek to divert attention from the main issue: Bush's performance before and after 9/11. He told ABC that he expects it to go on. "I'm getting a bulletproof vest," he said.

His last quote is telling, and is a response that no doubt has the Clinton Camp thinking that an Arkancide would damage Bush...

2 posted on 03/23/2004 7:13:17 PM PST by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"Clarke thus represents Bush's worst nightmare: an undeniable insider with no obvious history of partisanship who has challenged his performance on the one issue that he cannot afford to surrender."

What clap trap! Clarke is trying to say that when he was in charge of this stuff, everything was OK, and when he was demoted then things went to hell because the administration didn't want his opinion.

Any real examination will show that his tenure in office was marked by acts of terrorism against American interests on an almost regular basis!

Putz!
3 posted on 03/23/2004 7:17:46 PM PST by Mr. Jazzy (Proud to be a charter member of the Anit-Tag Line Association.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
"I'm getting a bulletproof vest," he said.

Clarke's money would be better spent on a good psychiatrist, but he is suffering from Joe Wilson-megalomania syndrome.

Did you see Clarke's cool sunglasses today? I can't wait for the Vanity Fair layout.

4 posted on 03/23/2004 7:28:11 PM PST by Spotsy (Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy
Clarke lied about Condie Rice. His credibility is now ZERO!

She gave interviews on Al Qa'ida and Usama bin Laden in the fall of 2000 and from all reports she was well versed.

His claims that she never heard of Al Qa'ida simply kills this anal sphincter.

5 posted on 03/23/2004 7:31:20 PM PST by jwalsh07 (We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
The first was a new staff report revealing that the previous administration -- the one headed by some guy named Clinton -- had three opportunities in 1998 and 1999 to launch lethal strikes at Osama bin Laden but failed to pull the trigger. Each time, according to the report, senior officials overruled field operatives on the grounds that the intel was uncertain and the risk of "collateral damage" great.

Window dressing, window dressing, blah blah blah. Boiled down to tis essence: Clinton had three opportunities to handle the very same menace Bush's critics claim he hasn't handled... and punted, three times out of three.

Ain't no way in hell to spin that puppy to the 'Rats advantage. :)

6 posted on 03/23/2004 7:33:41 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
They are going to let him TALK for two and a half hours tomorrow; center stage.

IMO, Richard Clarke has lived his whole life for this moment.

When he's done, nobody is going to believe a word he said, up to and including his claim that HE grounded the planes on 9-11.
7 posted on 03/23/2004 7:33:49 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
WASHINGTON -- When it really needed it, the beleaguered Bush administration found some succor Tuesday

Boy, I sure am glad there's no such thing as media bias, especially in lead paragraphs of important news stories. < / sarcasm>

8 posted on 03/23/2004 7:34:02 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Broadly speaking, the short words are the best, and the old words best of all." - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
He's toast. In all likelihood, after this thrashing, he will spend the rest of his life hating Bush and trying to abridge the First Amendment.
9 posted on 03/23/2004 7:35:56 PM PST by jwalsh07 (We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Clarke lied about Condie Rice. His credibility is now ZERO!

Condi isn't the only one Clarke lied about. Wolfowitz told the Senate today in not so many words that Clarke had lied about him as well.

Clarke also lied when he claimed the offer of bin Laden by the Sudan to Clinton was a "fable". Clinton is on tape explaining why he didn't take them up on it.

I love it when these low-lifes try to smear Bush and it back-fires on them. It's poetic justice.

10 posted on 03/23/2004 7:38:54 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
But is anybody other than FR folks ever going to hear about it?
11 posted on 03/23/2004 7:42:07 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of Venery (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
I love it when these low-lifes try to smear Bush and it back-fires on them. It's poetic justice.

Me too Jorge. :-}

12 posted on 03/23/2004 7:46:19 PM PST by jwalsh07 (We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax; faithincowboys; Howlin; Miss Marple; Peach; BigSkyFreeper; Pukin Dog
Followed the 9-11 inquisition live today. If your screen name is faithincowboys, you were screaming that the sky was falling--just like Chicken Little.

Meanwhile, the rest of us savored the tactful responses of Sec'ys Powell and Rumsfeld, while gaping at the likes of a moron named Gorelick and a pin-striped snake named Ben-Veniste who battled for camera face time to spew Democrat talking points.

13 posted on 03/23/2004 7:51:34 PM PST by NautiNurse (Missing Iraqi botulinum toxin? Look at John Kerry's face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Just as the administration was launching a frantic effort to fend off the allegations of former White House counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke

AKA refuting lies.

"Frantic"? Give me a break.

14 posted on 03/23/2004 7:53:21 PM PST by cyncooper ("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Wolfowitz told the Senate today in not so many words that Clarke had lied about him as well.

Clarke has a "creative memory", said Wolfowitz, as he pointed out factual errors in Clarke's tome that Wolfowitz hadn't been granted a copy of while reporters were calling him with quotes from the book and wanting a response.

15 posted on 03/23/2004 7:56:46 PM PST by cyncooper ("The 'War on Terror ' is not a figure of speech")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
WASHINGTON -- When it really needed it, the beleaguered Bush administration found some succor Tuesday from an unlikely and potentially dangerous source: the commission investigating the 9/11 terror attacks.

Just as the administration was launching a frantic effort to fend off the allegations of former White House counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke that it failed to take al-Qaida seriously...

beleaguered?.....Just as the administration was launching a frantic effort?

Isn't it funny how NO one but the DNC "Newsmedia" sees things in these terms? I wonder how they are going to explain why their boy Kerry took an 8 point hit (Pro-Democ rat Newsweek poll) in the polls the last two weeks from this "belegured, frantic" Whitehouse?
16 posted on 03/23/2004 8:05:21 PM PST by MNJohnnie (If you have to pretend to be something you are not, you have all ready lost the debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
Jorge said

Clarke also lied when he claimed the offer of bin Laden by the Sudan to Clinton was a "fable". Clinton is on tape explaining why he didn't take them up on it.

I love it when these low-lifes try to smear Bush and it back-fires on them. It's poetic justice.

AnAmericanMother replied

But is anybody other than FR folks ever going to hear about it?

Yep, read this story (link below). Bad news for Clarke. This guy is a Foreign Affairs correspondent for Fox News now. He has all ready made an on air open challenge to debate Lying Dick Clarke anywhere, anytime. Clarke is toast credibilitywise. Only the Hysteric Left who hate Bush will take a word Clarke says seriously not that all the facts have come out on him

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/3/22/223420.shtml








17 posted on 03/23/2004 8:12:53 PM PST by MNJohnnie (If you have to pretend to be something you are not, you have all ready lost the debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Wolfowitz said "selective reporters" had the book, making his point, big time.
18 posted on 03/23/2004 8:14:47 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Well, that's good to know.

19 posted on 03/23/2004 8:31:06 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of Venery (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Hey, Senators, I'm giving you this piece of advice down and dirty. It's our lives. It's America's life. It's crunch time. The enemy wants America wiped off the chalk board of your acedemically spoilt minds.

President Bush is huntin' maggot terrorist scum down. Bringin' 'em to justice while all you guys do is whine and talk about it. As if you are helping to win this most vital and critical war on terrorism.

I'm just thankful that one man, our President Bush, has stepped valiently up to the plate and his massive and far reaching bat is blasting these murdering Islamobastards out of the world stadium.

All senators want to do is talk talk us until we are blue in the face and sputtering in aghast amazement at their lack of shock and awe. Well, go but on some cheerleading outfits for once and root and yell proudly for the USA and her brave Troops.

20 posted on 03/23/2004 8:31:44 PM PST by harpo11 (Give 'em Hell Team Bush! If the media doesn't want us to remember 9-11, it's up to us to do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson