Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PUBLIC PAYROLL SOARS (wealth transfer gone from citizens to people in Govt)
LA Daily News ^ | 3./22/04 | Troy Anderson

Posted on 03/23/2004 2:42:17 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf

(I instructed the Admin Moderator to remove the other thread).

______________________________________________________

Public payroll soars

Salaries move far ahead of inflation

From the city of Los Angeles to California state government, the cost of salaries and benefits for public employees has soared far faster than inflation in the last five years -- three times as fast in the case of the Los Angeles Unified School District, a Daily News analysis has found.

The study showed that spending for public employees' salaries and benefits at the state and local levels increased overall at more than twice the rate of inflation and grew faster than the per capita income of average Californians. The cost of pensions was excluded from the analysis because of the wide disparity between different levels of government.

The spending binge started at a time that tax revenues were soaring, at the peak of the 1990s dot-com boom. Now that the boom has gone bust and the economy remains weak, state and local officials are making deep cuts in public services and looking for ways to raise fees and taxes. The review covered the fiscal years from 1997-98 to 2002-03.

"At all levels of government, the rate of compensation has gone up much more rapidly than it has in the private sector and, most importantly, faster than the personal income of the people who pay for this," said Steven B. Frates, a senior fellow at the Rose Institute of State and Local Government at Claremont McKenna College.

"There has been a wealth transfer. It has gone from the citizens to the people in government".

"You often hear people in government cry that there are going to be cuts and we're hurting the poor and the little children. The fact of the matter is the citizens of the state, county and city are making life better, not necessarily for schoolchildren or people in need, but for government employees."

The review covered the state of California; the city of Los Angeles; Los Angeles County and three neighboring counties; the LAUSD; and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Overall salary and benefit expenditures increased between 18 percent at the MTA and 53 percent for San Bernardino County during the five-year period.

The portion for employee benefits alone jumped by 35 to 186 percent.

In comparison, the inflation rate in California rose 17 percent, and per capita income in the state increased 24 percent.

Pension costs varied widely and dropped at some public agencies like Los Angeles city government, which has its own pension fund that profited from the booming stock market, and skyrocketed by as much as 79 percent at other agencies. Many local governments now face huge pension bills largely because of expansion in pension benefits.

Workers' compensation costs rose between 29 and 141 percent, and overtime costs increased by 13 to 60 percent.

In the last five years, per capita income in California increased 24 percent, from $26,521 to $32,898. Nationally, employees in the private sector earn an average of $34,299 a year, plus $13,374 in benefits.

That compares to the $49,005 annual salaries local and state government employees enjoy, plus $21,528 in benefits, according to U.S. Department of Labor statistics.

The highest average salary and benefits package is in Los Angeles County, where compensation jumped from $59,126 to $79,057, although officials point out that many employees went without raises for several years in the mid-1990s.

Local and state government officials said they approved compensation increases for their employees to remain competitive with other government agencies and the private sector, and that some cost increases, such as health care and workers' compensation, were outside of their control.

Some union leaders questioned the figures.

"We represent over 50,000 county employees whose salaries increased 24 percent over 10 years, an average increase of 2.4 percent a year," said Bart Diener, assistant general manager of Service Employees International Union, Local 660, which represents Los Angeles County workers. "We believe this is appropriate and in line with the growth in the economy."

But H.D. Palmer, spokesman for the state Department of Finance under Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, said the 41 percent rise in state salary and benefits costs under former Gov. Gray Davis clearly exceeds similar increases in the private sector.

"Looking at that growth in the rearview mirror, it's clear that kind of growth is unsustainable over the long haul," Palmer said. "It's one of the reasons the governor has said he'd like to reopen a number of contracts with state employee unions."

With the state facing a massive shortfall even after voters approved a $15 billion bond issue mainly to refinance existing debt, state and local government agencies now face making steep cuts. Much of the problem was caused by a five-year state spending spree that raised expenditures 43 percent while revenue rose only 25 percent.

Los Angeles County faces making nearly $500 million in cuts, while the city of Los Angeles faces $250 million and the LAUSD $600 million.

County Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich said the biggest portion of the salary increases comes from often unnoticed 2.75 percent and 5.5 percent annual "step" increases, or merit raises, which local and state government workers get during their first five to 11 years of employment.

"And many times employees who reach the fifth step after five years will be reclassified for another five years," Antonovich said. "This is above any cost-of-living adjustments negotiated in labor contracts. That's why those numbers go up so much each year and services are cut.

"So what they need to have is a two-tiered system. Labor laws need to be modified. You could develop a new classification that would allow step increases based upon merit and performance with a smaller increase. So what you would have is something similar to the private sector where promotions are based on merit and performance, not just showing up and having your eyes open."

Jon Coupal, president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, said the figures confirm that the only "growth industry" in California is government.

"It's clear that the size of government and the slice it takes from the private sector continues to expand," Coupal said. "And while private sector businesses have suffered, it appears that local and state government believe they are beyond economic pressures."

Coupal said local and state officials should renegotiate contracts with employees unions, consider salary and benefit cuts, work furloughs and layoffs to reduce spending.

But Robert Stern, president of the Center for Governmental Studies, said government employee unions are powerful in California and he's not aware of any agencies cutting salaries and benefits since the Great Depression.

"These are pretty stout increases in both salaries and benefits," said Jack Kyser, chief economist at the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp. "But the attitude in Sacramento was, 'Look at all this money coming in,' and they spent us into a massive budget deficit."

And, with the state plagued by a structural deficit of up to $10 billion a year, Kyser added: "We are either going to have to increase taxes or make painful cuts in spending. We are not out of the woods yet."

Frates of the Rose Institute said elected leaders bear the blame.

"They gave the farm away," Frates said. "California politicians need to be candid and open about what they are actually spending taxpayer money on.

"They frequently use the shorthand of, 'It's for public safety, education and public health,' when in fact it's for lavish salary and benefit increases for public employees at the expense of the general citizens of California. There are many public safety employees who now make more in retirement than they did when they were working and they get to retire at age 50."

Schwarzenegger is trying to renegotiate contracts. Los Angeles city officials have talked about renegotiations as well and County Chief Administrative Officer David Janssen has proposed a 1 percent salary cut for county employees and furloughs to save about $20 million.

"The question is do we make these necessary adjustments, or do we fire people?" Antonovich asked. "I'd rather make reductions and keep people employed. I believe you will find from workers a willingness to move forward and take reductions to retain their jobs and continue providing services to the public.

"The union leaders have traditionally opposed these reductions and would rather lay off people than have any reductions in compensation. To me, that is cruel and unnecessary. They don't want to jeopardize the benefits they have already gotten." l=8s=8 Troy Anderson, (213) 974-8985 troy.anderson@dailynews.com AT A GLANCE Here are highlights of the changes over the last five years based on figures from state and local governments, comparing fiscal year 1997-98 to fiscal year 2002-03. State:

Spending for salaries and benefits, excluding pensions, was up 41 percent, from $13.3 billion to $18.7 billion.

The number of full-time employees increased 10.5 percent, from 192,377 to 212,563.

The salary for correctional officers increased 25.4 percent, from $65,450 to $82,066 a year. City of Los Angeles (Not counting the departments of water and power, airports and harbor):

Spending for salaries and benefits, excluding pensions, rose 26 percent, from $1.8 billion to $2.2 billion.

The average salary of civilian workers rose 23 percent, from $45,534 to $55,919, while the average for police officers grew 28 percent, from $60,397 to $77,537.

Overtime costs increased by 61 percent, and workers' compensation costs went up 81 percent. Los Angeles schools:

In the Los Angeles Unified School District, expenditures for salaries and benefits rose 51 percent, from $3.6 billion to $5.4 billion.

The average salary and benefits package of an LAUSD employee grew by 27 percent, from $51,424 to $65,526.

The number of full-time employees expanded 18 percent, from 69,140 to 81,691. Los Angeles County:

Expenditures for salaries and benefits rose 39 percent, from $5.0 billion to $6.9 billion.

The average county employee's salary increased 31 percent, from $37,664 to $49,343.

Workers' compensation costs soared 96 percent, from $143.1 million to $281.0 million. Ventura County:

Salaries and benefits rose 22 percent, from $271.5 million to $330.9 million.

Overtime shot up 55 percent, from $1.9 million to $2.9 million.

Workers' compensation costs skyrocketed 141 percent, from $4.5 million to $10.7 million. MTA:

Salaries and benefits increased 18 percent, from $499 million to $589 million.

The number of full-time employees was up by 17.9 percent, from 7,576 to 8,930.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: government
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-252 next last
To: Joe Hadenuf
While most everyone else has to work, to pay for the millions of government employes who enjoy the day off. We are even paying them to take these days off.

Allow me to step in. I work an alternate schedule, in fact I have this Friday off. I do it by working what's called a 5/4/9. Last week I worked 44 hours, this week I'll work 36. Total for the pay period, 80 hours. Some people work 4/10, four 10-hour days per week. Believe me, you're getting your 40 hours a week out of me and everybody else works an alternate schedule.

81 posted on 03/23/2004 8:18:23 PM PST by Not A Snowbird (You need tons click "co-ordinating")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
You seem to be defending this article and the offensive tax paid benefits and big government salaries. Of course, you are a public/government employee, are you not?

Did you read this article? Do you think this article is a good thing?

Should local, state and the federal government continue to grow by leaps and bounds on the bending backs of the tax payers?

82 posted on 03/23/2004 8:30:39 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
I am not defending the article. I'm correcting an error you made in your last post.

Go ahead and rant about government run amok, that's fine with me. But please be factual while you're doing it.

Yes, I am a government employee, and I'm not the slightest bit ashamed of my career choice.
83 posted on 03/23/2004 8:34:44 PM PST by Not A Snowbird (You need tons click "co-ordinating")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
Last week I worked 44 hours, this week I'll work 36.

That's brutal Sandy. Of course in the private sector, Mom and Dad are working 80 plus hours per week so 50 percent of their income can be taken to pay for your salary and benefits.

84 posted on 03/23/2004 8:37:25 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Every ass-dragging government parasite I ever met was absolutely convinced the Republic couldn't continue without him cashing his paychecks.

Start firing people until only police, courts and the military are left.

I'm sick to death of Big Stupid Government.

85 posted on 03/23/2004 8:39:44 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never let your life be directed by people who could only get government jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
I'm correcting an error you made in your last post.

What error?

86 posted on 03/23/2004 8:40:06 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Your posting reminds me of an e-mail that I sent to John Derbyshire of National Review. He was asking what the middle-class of tomorrow will look like, since so many technical jobs are being off-shored. I sent this as a reply to his column:

THE MIDDLE-CLASS OF TOMORROW will be made up of people working in these broadly defined categories:

1) GOVERNMENT WORKERS - I mean government workers at ALL levels of government, from the local dog catcher to the Pres. A HUGE percentage of our population works directly for some sort of government agency. An even larger percentage of the population is employed indirectly by the government, as contractors, suppliers, and so forth (I learned that growing up in Chicago...)

2) TRANSPORTATION & LOGISTICS WORKERS - We have not yet reached the day when we can out-source the job of a train locomotive engineer or that of a truck driver. Same thing with pilots and stewardesses. While the transportation industry goes through it's up and downs like everyone else, it's here to stay. Somebody has to unload the new Toyotas at the port of Los Angeles. Also, someone has to make the new Toyotas at the plant in Georgetown, Kentucky...

3) HEALTH CARE - Got to have doctors, nurses and druggists to keep all those government workers healthy....

4) RETAIL & RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT - Government workers need supermarkets and Wal-Marts like the rest of us. These guys make up the low end of the middle class spectrum, but still count.

5) TRADES - Carpenters, electricians, mechanics and plumbers will always have a job. The government workers need homes to live in, office buildings to work in, and stores to shop in. The numbers employed may fluctuate, but they can never be truly outsourced.

6) LAW - Government workers get divorces and buy real estate just like everyone else. Sadly, lawyers will always be with us.

7) EDUCATION - Government workers want to have their children to be properly educated. Some even opt for private schools. But I don't mean by "education" just those who are teachers and administrators, but all those businesses and industries that cater to the education market, like publishers and Dell and that sort of thing.

8) RELIGION - A minute amount of our population makes an earning ministering to other's spiritual needs. People like going to churches, synagogues, temples, and that sort of thing, especially here in the USA. People like being in the same room with their spiritual mentors. Outsourcing is definitely NOT an option for the religious. If anything, we export for more religion (Christianity) than we import, and that trend will continue for the foreseeable future, even though India, South America and China have all surpassed the USA in the total number of Christian missionaries they send out. (Very few people know that the USA has been surpassed by these other countries in this regard)

9) GRAPHIC ARTS INCLUDING ADVERTISING, MARKETING, ETC. It was philosophy professor Peter Kreeft who correctly pointed out that advertising is truly the world's oldest profession. ("Hey Eve, check out this forbidden fruit! It will make you as smart as GOD!") The United States, surprisingly, is unsurpassed in this regard. No way this could ever be outsourced. You've got to be a part of the culture your marketing to. Americans are, by far, some of the most creative people on earth. We rule when it comes to pop-culture, there isn't even a close second. We are just like the Borg, we assimilate everything.

10) FINANCE - People like their EdwardJones and local banks. There will always be a need to have a neighborhood money-changer.

You know, as I look at this list, I realize just how old these professions are! This exact same list is just as true for those living during the time of Christ as it is for us today. Scary thought....

You can read Derbyshire's column, "The Dismal Science" by clicking here.

http://www.nationalreview.com/derbyshire/derbyshire200402110914.asp

87 posted on 03/23/2004 8:42:56 PM PST by Ronzo (GOD alone is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
Yes, I am a government employee, and I'm not the slightest bit ashamed of my career choice.

Hey, that's great Sandy. Maybe someday we can all be government employee's and get those knock out, killer salaries and benefits. The only problem we will have is figuring out who to take the money from. Let's see.....

88 posted on 03/23/2004 8:44:19 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
My point was that we're not getting "free" days off, which you implied. I was clearing up any misconception that we work less than our scheduled 80 hours per pay period.

My managers work much longer hours, without entitlement to overtime. They are called at all hours of the night to deal with various and sundry crises, travel constantly, and definitely earn their keep compared to the salaries pulled down by comparable private sector executives. Not one has a "chauffeur".

However, your mind is made up so I can see there's no having a civil conversation with you on this subject. I can't state a fact without having sarcasm and spite thrown back at me.

Therefore, I shall bid you good night. Enjoy the rest of your evening.

Out.
89 posted on 03/23/2004 8:45:39 PM PST by Not A Snowbird (You need tons click "co-ordinating")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
Every ass-dragging government parasite I ever met was absolutely convinced the Republic couldn't continue without him cashing his paychecks. Start firing people until only police, courts and the military are left.

I'm sick to death of Big Stupid Government.

I agree Hank.

When I posted this, I was just waiting for the usual suspects to show up and attempt minimize this. Two of the forums big Konservatives arrived like clock work. One was clearly upset.

Yes, it seems government is becoming our biggest growing industry, on the bending backs of the tax payers. It'll only get worse, as local, state and federal governments have grown too large, and all encompassing.

90 posted on 03/23/2004 8:57:50 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
However, your mind is made up so I can see there's no having a civil conversation with you on this subject.

Well, er.. I read the article and I know I'm spending about 50 percent of my income to pay for government employe salaries, so I would say I am a pretty good judge of this.

You think I am the only one out here in private sector land that sees this disturbing trend?

91 posted on 03/23/2004 9:05:02 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
Last week I worked 44 hours, this week I'll work 36.

Wow, a 44-hour week. To me, that would be like going on vacation.

So do the people who pay your salary have to option to not do so? Or does Big Stupid Government put a gun to their head and take their money by force?

92 posted on 03/23/2004 9:06:24 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never let your life be directed by people who could only get government jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
I can't state a fact without having sarcasm and spite thrown back at me.

I can't imagine why anyone in the private sector would be upset at having 50 percent of their income, routinely confiscated by the goverment.

93 posted on 03/23/2004 9:35:28 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf; marsh2; ScottinSacto; steelie; Carry_Okie; farmfriend; tubebender; hedgetrimmer; ...
What a FANTASTIC POST!!!

The great controversy between the public and private sectors is most assuredly shifting to the public sector socialistic side... ENMASS!!!

It's reaching "critical mass," with government being the largest employer in my county, as well as the fastest growing employer!!!

This has got to be turned back... somehow... If they're afraid to tax more to support it, they just borrow more while pretending to be "fiscally responsible!" It's attrocious!!!

94 posted on 03/23/2004 10:17:46 PM PST by SierraWasp (The Militant EnvironMental Movement has changed America to a Multi-Level Marketing Government!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
This has got to be turned back... somehow... If they're afraid to tax more to support it, they just borrow more while pretending to be "fiscally responsible!" It's attrocious!!!

There going to have to start getting real creative and sneaky, as many in the private sector just don't have any more to give.

95 posted on 03/23/2004 10:32:13 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Sheesh, you are naggy. Tell us Poobah, who approved all this out of control, govenment spending?

BUSH! LOL!!

96 posted on 03/23/2004 11:10:21 PM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
This has got to be turned back... somehow...

Well in California any way but is that a surprise?

97 posted on 03/23/2004 11:12:54 PM PST by Texasforever (I am all flamed out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
It's a bigger problem than you think. Government union pension funds are very influential in business investing. permitting and social policy. For example, homosexual marriage and domestic partner benefits are forced on corporations by pension executors by welding stakeholder power.

Another scandal is in knowing what happens to government budget surpluses at year end. Often surpluses are rolled over to fill gaps in pension funding or to create 'future fund allocations' based on unforseen fund deficits, i.e. if funds are invested and losses occur.

And these surpluses occur even if overall goverment expenditures cause them to be in the red! This happens because surpluses are often occurring at lower levels where the so-called surplus disappears into other cost categories such as the retirement fund deficits discussed above.

It's a scandal that deserves alot of exposure.
98 posted on 03/23/2004 11:26:44 PM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
anyone here think ot would be unconstitutional (violation of free political sppech) to prohibit public employee unions from spending money on campaigns for offices with which they negotiate their salaries and benefits.
99 posted on 03/23/2004 11:28:54 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: breakem
You bet
100 posted on 03/23/2004 11:29:40 PM PST by Texasforever (I am all flamed out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson