Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Salty Sea Covered Part of Mars: 'Excellent' Site to Search for Past Life
Space.com ^ | 3/23/04 | Robert Roy Britt

Posted on 03/23/2004 11:08:10 AM PST by ZGuy

A salty sea once washed over the plains of Mars at the Opportunity rover's landing site, creating a life-friendly environment more earthlike than any known on another world, NASA scientists announced today.

The rover found evidence for the shores of a large body of surface water that contained currents, which left their marks in rocks that developed at the bottom of the sea. Opportunity found a distinct chemical makeup in the rocks and unique layering patterns that must have been generated by slow-moving water in an evaporating sea, researchers said.

The discovery casts fresh light on the possibility that critters could have gained a toehold on the red planet when it was younger, warmer and wetter.

Scientists don't yet know how deep the ocean was, exactly when it existed or for how long.

The finding builds on the March 2 announcement that Meridiani Planum, where Opportunity landed, had long ago been soaked with water. Geologists could not tell from those initial results whether the water was above the surface or only underground.

"We think Opportunity is now parked on what was once the shoreline of a salty sea on Mars," Cornell University's Steve Squyres, principal science investigator for the Mars rover mission, said in a statement provided to SPACE.com prior to a press conference today.

The rocks would be excellent preservers of biological signs, if life ever existed on Mars, Squyres said. That makes Meridiani Planum a prime target for future missions that would search for evidence of past biology.

An ancient sea also implies that early Mars was warmer than today, said University of Colorado geologist Bruce Jakosky, who was not directly involved in the finding. And he said it suggests that any possible microbes on Mars would not have had to rely only on relatively inefficient subsurface, geochemical energy, but might have used direct sunlight as an energy source.

"If it's surface water, that would allow the possibility of photosynthetic organisms," Jakosky told SPACE.com. "Once you can tap into sunlight, it leaves open the possibility for a much greater abundance of life if it was ever there."

Scientists so far have no firm evidence that Mars was ever inhabited, however.

Sedimentary signs

The crucial clues that came together in recent days included the detection of chlorine and bromine, indicating a salty sea had evaporated over time, scientists said. Also significant were crisscrossing layers of sediment in the rock that revealed they formed beneath currents of moving water.

Early interpretations of the same lines of research led to the previous discovery that the rocks were once soaked in water, but it wasn't clear if the water was present when the rocks formed, or if the water came later. Increased confidence in the bromine finding strengthened the case that the particles which formed the rocks had precipitated out of surface water, with salt concentrations that increased as the water evaporated.

Some layers within the rock are at telltale angles to the main layers. Scientists call the patterns "crossbedding." Other features, called festooned layers, involve smile-shaped curves produced by shifting, rippled shapes of loose sediments under a current of water.

The patterns indicate sediment the size of sand grains had bonded together into ripples in water that was at least 2 inches (5 centimeters) deep -- and possibly much deeper, said John Grotzinger, a rover science team member from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The water flowed at a rate somewhere between 4 and 20 inches every second (10 to 50 centimeters per second). That's up to about 1 mile an hour.

"Ripples that formed in wind look different than ripples formed in water," Grotzinger said.

The rocks may have been cast in a salt flat that was alternately wet and dry, Grotzinger added. Similar environments on Earth, at the edge of oceans or in desert basins, sometimes have currents of water that produce the type of ripples seen in the Mars rocks.

Brighter prospects

The discovery re-ignited enthusiasm over Mars as a potential well for biology, at least in the past. (Researchers are unsure whether any life that ever developed on Mars -- if it did -- could have endured into the present era, with Mars being cold and dry.)

"The particular type of rock Opportunity is finding, with evaporite sediments from standing water, offers excellent capability for preserving evidence of any biochemical or biological material that may have been in the water," said Squyres, the rover mission's chief scientist.

The discovery quite literally brightens the prospects for past life in another important way.

Had the water been only subsurface, life would have had to rely on geochemical energy, such as the decay of rocks into methane. On Earth, dependence on geochemical energy is a limiting factor for underground microbes, said Jakosky, the University of Colorado geologist who is also director of the university's NASA-sponsored Center for Astrobiology. He helped pick the rover landing sites but has not been directly involved in the science explorations.

Organisms that depend on geochemical energy are less diverse and of more limited scope than life that flourishes in sunlight, Jakosky explained.

"This dramatic confirmation of standing water in Mars' history builds on a progression of discoveries about that most earthlike of alien planets," said Ed Weiler, NASA associate administrator for space science. "This result gives us impetus to expand our ambitious program of exploring Mars to learn whether microbes have ever lived there and, ultimately, whether we can."

Most scientists agree that finding signs of past or present life will likely require sending a robot to bring back samples for study in laboratories on Earth. Meridiani Planum is, for now, the best destination for such a mission, which NASA has slated for launch sometime in the next decade.

"Someday we must collect these rocks and bring them back to terrestrial laboratories to read their records for clues to the biological potential of Mars," said James Garvin, lead scientist for Mars and lunar exploration at NASA Headquarters.

Hints at 'warm and wet' Mars

Finding a sea on Mars also hints at the past climate. Scientists have been arguing for decades over whether Mars was once warm and wet or just wetter and cold.

"I think that this seems to point toward Mars being warm enough and wet enough to allow standing water" in the distant past, Jakosky said.

Jakosky also explained that today's announcement means the water was present as the sedimentary rock formed. The rocks are known to be from Mars' early epochs, so the water was likely there in the very, very distant history of the planet's roughly 4.5 billion years of existence. Had the new evidence pointed only to groundwater altering the chemistry of the rocks, such water might have coursed through the rocks at any time during the planet's history, including well after the rocks themselves were formed.

Opportunity had spent its entire time on Mars, since landing in late January, inside a shallow crater studying soil and the exposed shelf of bedrock. The most recent and telling observations came by taking 152 microscopic pictures of a rock named Last Chance.

The findings add to previous rover discoveries of hematite, a mineral typically formed in water, and the layered rocks being laden with salts, which led scientists to conclude the region was at least soaked with groundwater.

Other investigations from orbiting spacecraft have revealed possible shorelines elsewhere on Mars, but no ground measurements have confirmed any of those findings, and some scientists had remained skeptical that Mars ever harbored any significant surface water.

Scientists have said they see no visible shorelines surrounding the Meridiani Planum, so they can't yet deduce the size of the ancient body of water.

The rover left the crater this week and will now try to examine what scientists think is a larger rock outcropping some distance away. The rover will roam across a vast plain that is, overall, the size of Oklahoma.

At the larger outcropping, researchers hope to find more extensive layers and read them like pages of a history book, to learn more about the depth, breadth and timing of the ocean that long ago graced the red planet.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mars; nasa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: RightWhale
One useful system would be a seismic 'thumper' and detector array to map the boundaries between the sediments and the rock basement (probably basalt) in the Meridiani area.
41 posted on 03/24/2004 12:35:21 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
What does the Smithsonian have to do with anything? It's marvelous entertainment to be sure, but still entertainment at the taxpayers' expense.

Are you aware that the Smithsonian was bankrolling some big time honcho who was crashing aeroplanes into the Potomac at the same time that the Wright brothers were developing their airplane? This "socialism" as you call it has been going on since the birth of the Republic.

42 posted on 03/24/2004 12:36:26 PM PST by NathanR (California Si! Aztlan NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
If Halliburton is involved, which they probably are, they may have a thumper on the drawing boards already. It's a good idea. NASA has a panel looking at suggestions for the new space program and they take email.
43 posted on 03/24/2004 12:44:15 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Fitzcarraldo
Off-Earth seismic experiments have been done in the past. I believe there was one on the moon, but possibly Mars, where a spent part of a satellite was sent crashing into the planet/moon. This is from memory. I'm going to have to look it up.
44 posted on 03/24/2004 4:31:11 PM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: capitan_refugio
That was done on the moon with very little result. It is also going to be done to a comet or asteroid shortly. Smash it and see what happens. On the moon they had hoped to splash up some hydrogen.
45 posted on 03/24/2004 4:40:36 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NathanR
This "socialism" as you call it has been going on since the birth of the Republic.

ppsssttt!! Thats a terrible arguement! =o)

46 posted on 03/24/2004 6:24:07 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: shield
...if they do find life on Mars, they will also find that life came from Earth...

Or vice versa.
47 posted on 03/24/2004 6:30:09 PM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
I once felt the same way as you do. Below is a great book to read, it is amazing information.

The Creator and the Cosmos: How the Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God by Hugh, Ph.D. Ross

"THE HEAVENS ARE TELLING THE GLORY OF GOD; AND THE FIRMAMENT PROCLAIMS HIS HANDIWORK."-Psalm 19:1 Few of us can venture outside on a clear, dark night and not pause for a silent, reflective look at the stars. For countless centuries people have felt a sense of wonder about the heavens. How did our universe come into being? Has it always been here? Is our existence due to random chance or supernatural design? Is God "out there"? If so, what is He like?

Traditionally, the church has answered such questions with Scripture, while science has contributed theories and formulas of its own. Torn between a deep respect for church doctrines and an intellectual need for answers that support what their senses are telling them, many Christians have avoided such discussions altogether.

Actually, the two sides are no longer that far apart. In The Creator and the Cosmos, astrophysicist Dr. Hugh Ross explains how recent scientific measurements of the universe have clearly pointed to the existence of God. Whether you're looking for scientific support for your faith or new reasons to believe, The Creator and the Cosmos will enable you to see the Creator for yourself.

"A compelling summary of scientific evidence that supports belief in God and the Word of God, written on a level even the non-technically trained lay person can understand."-Walter L. Bradley, professor and head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University

"In The Creator and the Cosmos, Dr. Hugh Ross shows how recent cosmological discoveries clearly indicate the universe was created with many characteristics fine-tuned for our life. Though many scientists may resist the logical conclusion, the Creator implied by the scientific evidence is exactly consistent with the God revealed in the Bible."-Dr. Kyle M. Cudworth, Yerkes Observatory, University of Chicago

48 posted on 03/24/2004 8:53:13 PM PST by shield (Scientific Discoveries of the century reveal GOD!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Thanks for the information. I was able to round up this on a google:

http://ganymede.ipgp.jussieu.fr/dgsp/NL-2001b.pdf

49 posted on 03/24/2004 9:35:26 PM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: shield
That's all well and good, but how does Dr. Ross' theory require that any life which may be found to have existed on Mars must have come from Earth?

It would seem that the deity's fine-tuning of Earth to support life might also have occured on Mars.
50 posted on 03/25/2004 5:21:48 AM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
"Thats a terrible arguement! "

In what way?
51 posted on 03/25/2004 8:08:00 AM PST by NathanR (California Si! Aztlan NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
You need to read the book, you'll be amazed. I know I was. I felt like you about life elsewhere, Ross proves factually how that is not possible. This is not a theory.
52 posted on 03/25/2004 8:09:38 AM PST by shield (Scientific Discoveries of the century reveal GOD!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NathanR
Are you aware that the Smithsonian was bankrolling some big time honcho who was crashing aeroplanes into the Potomac at the same time that the Wright brothers were developing their airplane? This "socialism" as you call it has been going on since the birth of the Republic

Thats supposed to be an argument in favor of government funded research?

53 posted on 03/25/2004 6:54:17 PM PST by GeronL (http://www.ArmorforCongress.com......................Send a Freeper to Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
That was an answer as to what the Smithsonian had to do with anything.

I may have libertarian tendencies, but government has a place and things like police and fire are some of them. Philosophers have always had patrons, and in this country that would be the government.
54 posted on 03/26/2004 12:13:14 PM PST by NathanR (California Si! Aztlan NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: NathanR
I think the fire department should work through a subscription. Even Libertarians think I am nuts on some of this.
55 posted on 03/26/2004 6:35:40 PM PST by GeronL (I am here for the duration! /kidding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
That was tried. The problem is that the fire companies actually set fires in order to drum up business.
56 posted on 03/28/2004 11:48:04 AM PST by NathanR (California Si! Aztlan NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: binger
This looks a lot like Afganistan
57 posted on 03/28/2004 11:56:14 AM PST by Soviet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
That makes Meridiani Planum a prime target for future missions that would search for evidence of past biology.

NASA is still on the 'search for life' kick. This is a wild goose chase. NASA should concentrate on designing a self-sufficient science station for Mars--manned.

58 posted on 03/28/2004 12:01:48 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
Please do not follow me from thread to thread

You flatter yourself vastly.

or post to me anymore.

Quid pro quo. You quit your rude comments to people who disagree with you and confine yourself to issues and I'll quit posting to you.

59 posted on 03/30/2004 4:01:21 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: NathanR
Are you aware that the Smithsonian was bankrolling some big time honcho who was crashing aeroplanes into the Potomac

No I wasn't; however, this would seem to support my thesis that private spending is more productive.

60 posted on 03/30/2004 4:02:53 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson