[unsycophant]

You aren't worth the time it takes to compose a reply to, as you are ignorant of the facts, and are in no position to challenge mine. I'm not obligated to prove or disprove anything to you, just because you demand that I explain it all to you. If you don't like what I have to say, ignore it. I realize this only seems impossible for you to do at FR, but try.

As far as I'm concerned, you have become nothing more than an apologist for the banned trolls who disrupt this site and work to shut it down, as the only time I ever notice you is on threads where you are making waves about what is wrong at FR or with the people who participate here. Your attitude is often confrontational and accusatory regarding those who are most likely singled out on other sites and harassed by your allies, associates, friends, or whatever you wish to call them. It often seems like you are being directed or encouraged to do what they want to do but can't--you repeat phrases that many of us recognize as theirs, and you repeat facts that are wrong, or center attention on issues only they care about. I believe it has become painfully obvious that you aren't "with us", to say the least.

[technochick99]

I believe it has become painfully obvious that you aren't "with us", to say the least.

Who's "us", kemosabe?

I want Bush elected, heck I want Keyes elected. I share many of the same beliefs that most posters here do - very right-wing.

I'm a long-time FReeper, but I browse LP and AK. Heck, they say you do too! I've got a background of real-life activism. I disagree with certain things posted on this forum by certain people.

So am I a part of "us" or not? Care to define "us"?

[Sabertooth]

You aren't worth the time it takes to compose a reply to, as you are ignorant of the facts, and are in no position to challenge mine.

Yet you took the time.

If you have facts, post them. Anything verifiable that you posted in either of your deleted posts this weekend was shown to be untrue.

I'm not obligated to prove or disprove anything to you, just because you demand that I explain it all to you. If you don't like what I have to say, ignore it. I realize this only seems impossible for you to do at FR, but try.

Interesting.

Aren't you the one who said "Those nitwits didn't bother to source most of what they were spoonfed?"

Yet it's your prerogative to source nothing?

As far as I'm concerned, you have become nothing more than an apologist for the banned trolls who disrupt this site and work to shut it down, as the only time I ever notice you is on threads where you are making waves about what is wrong at FR or with the people who participate here.

How does your concern concern me?

Your attitude is often confrontational and accusatory regarding those who are most likely singled out on other sites and harassed by your allies, associates, friends, or whatever you wish to call them.

Feeling a llittle confrontational and accusatory? I think you're cutting in line, but feel free.

It often seems like you are being directed or encouraged to do what they want to do but can't--you repeat phrases that many of us recognize as theirs, and you repeat facts that are wrong, or center attention on issues only they care about.

By your preface I'm given to understand, "it often seems" to you.

If I've repeated facts that are wrong, you should have no trouble refuting them, much as I've done to your "facts" a couple of times recently.

I believe it has become painfully obvious that you aren't "with us", to say the least.

What should be obvious is that I'm not particularly "with" anyone.

What club that I don't want to join do you represent?

The "Two debunked and pulled posts on two threads in a day and plainclothes Mod backhand Club?"