Skip to comments.
YES!! Limbaugh discussing Kerry and the plot in Kansas City
Rush
| 3-23-04
| dfu
Posted on 03/23/2004 10:39:31 AM PST by doug from upland
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-300 next last
To: prairiebreeze
Randy Barnes?
221
posted on
03/23/2004 3:45:30 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
To: prairiebreeze
Randy Barnes in Nicosia's "Home from War" --
According to Barnes, everybody knew that the discussion in that hall "was grounds for criminal indictment of conspiracy."
222
posted on
03/23/2004 3:47:41 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
To: savedbygrace
Lots of things could go pop, sbg. His former co-conspirators at VVAW (or his crew from VN) could disappear or suffer memory loss or change their stories or go insane. But without massive, unrelenting pressure on the networks and the NYT/WP/LAT, it's doubtful the ball will get to the endzone.
To: familyofman
I read somewhere, today, that the pages exonerating Kerry were picked from twelve boxes of reports. So, one agent was not convinced that Kerry was a bad guy. What was in the other boxes? Not only that was this agent even present at the meeting, was he even privy to what went on at that meeting. There's a disconnect here somewhere and I think that it's intentional.
224
posted on
03/23/2004 3:52:22 PM PST
by
Eva
To: doug from upland
Yes, Barnes.
225
posted on
03/23/2004 3:53:52 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(America will CONTINUE to fight for and defend freedom. Even Spain's.)
To: prairiebreeze; doug from upland
Whoa, check
this out from the Gibson segment:
"...The vet said Kerry didn't like the plan and loudly argued against it. He thereby accidentally proved that Kerry was there at the meeting, and that he (the vet Gibson was interviewing) was not telling the truth when he said he did not recall Kerry being at the meeting at all. He did recall Kerry's presence enough to remember details about the argument, he just lied about it when asked directly earlier in the inverview."
To: sully777
You are preaching to the choir! Excellent points so express it to the media.
227
posted on
03/23/2004 3:55:14 PM PST
by
Toespi
(,)
To: John Thornton
Does anyone think that Kerry may have been the FBI mole within VVAW?Nope. I think he was there because he truly believed in the causes of VVAW...all of them.
To: spycatcher
Wow. Thanks for posting that!
229
posted on
03/23/2004 3:56:13 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
To: Bonaparte
Nearly every day, Granny used to tell me, "Nothing ventured, nothing gained."
To: spycatcher
LOL, I swear we get so used to the RATS deception that we don't easily recognize it sometimes. Of course he did just that....!
Prairie
231
posted on
03/23/2004 3:59:43 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(America will CONTINUE to fight for and defend freedom. Even Spain's.)
To: savedbygrace
Granny was wise.
Did she also tell you, "If it's worth doing at all, it's worth doing well"?
To: doug from upland
Scroll down too. A lot more "Kerry in KC" coverage from that Junkyard Blog website. Glad to see the weblogs are starting to hammer this story harder.
To: Eva
"So, one agent was not convinced that Kerry was a bad guy."We don't even know that much at this point. We only know that the Kerry campaign handed off some scraps of paper to CNN and that CNN dutifully recited the content of those scraps of paper. We've heard nothing from the FBI itself.
Ask yourself this: Since when does chain of custody for evidence of a possible crime include the suspect himself?
To: Bonaparte
"...co-conspirators at VVAW (or his crew from VN) could disappear..."
Or be run over while sleeping on the railroad tracks, or commit suicide by shooting themselves five times in the back of the head, or, or....damn! That story has already been done in Arkansas, hasn't it?
235
posted on
03/23/2004 4:17:10 PM PST
by
beelzepug
((growing more confused by the minute))
To: Bonaparte
Almost every day.
To: savedbygrace
:-)
To: Eva
I read somewhere, today, that the pages exonerating Kerry were picked from twelve boxes of reports. So, one agent was not convinced that Kerry was a bad guy. What was in the other boxes? Not only that was this agent even present at the meeting, was he even privy to what went on at that meeting. If the group was careful to pick an unbugged location for the meeting, and only allowed senior management in, the FBI had no way of knowing what was discussed. It's pretty obvious that only one or two hotheads wanted to discuss assassination, and it went no further. Problem is, over the years, some of them developed loose tongues. this is one of those Crime and Punishment scenerios. The guilty just have to confess.
238
posted on
03/23/2004 4:32:52 PM PST
by
js1138
To: spycatcher
"...The vet said Kerry didn't like the plan and loudly argued against it. He thereby accidentally proved that Kerry was there at the meeting, and that he (the vet Gibson was interviewing) was not telling the truth when he said he did not recall Kerry being at the meeting at all. He did recall Kerry's presence enough to remember details about the argument, he just lied about it when asked directly earlier in the inverview."
Barnes is one of the witnesses who first claimed that Kerry was at the meeting, then after a couple of calls from Veterans For Kerry head (and former VVAW member) John Hurley, he had a lapse of memory. Apparently his memory sometimes flashes back.
Anyway, this was the same tactic they tried on another witness to Kerry's presence, disabled vet (and to my mind a real hero) John Musgrave. But even after a couple of calls from Hurley, Musgrave stuck with his story.
BTW, Nicosia says that Barnes wasn't even in the meeting, but had to wait out on the lawn with the other non-trustees.
239
posted on
03/23/2004 4:41:19 PM PST
by
Hon
To: Hon
BTTT
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-300 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson