Replies

I read somewhere, today, that the pages exonerating Kerry were picked from twelve boxes of reports. So, one agent was not convinced that Kerry was a bad guy. What was in the other boxes? Not only that was this agent even present at the meeting, was he even privy to what went on at that meeting. There's a disconnect here somewhere and I think that it's intentional.

"So, one agent was not convinced that Kerry was a bad guy."

We don't even know that much at this point. We only know that the Kerry campaign handed off some scraps of paper to CNN and that CNN dutifully recited the content of those scraps of paper. We've heard nothing from the FBI itself.

Ask yourself this: Since when does chain of custody for evidence of a possible crime include the suspect himself?

I read somewhere, today, that the pages exonerating Kerry were picked from twelve boxes of reports. So, one agent was not convinced that Kerry was a bad guy. What was in the other boxes? Not only that was this agent even present at the meeting, was he even privy to what went on at that meeting.

If the group was careful to pick an unbugged location for the meeting, and only allowed senior management in, the FBI had no way of knowing what was discussed. It's pretty obvious that only one or two hotheads wanted to discuss assassination, and it went no further. Problem is, over the years, some of them developed loose tongues. this is one of those Crime and Punishment scenerios. The guilty just have to confess.