To: JohnGalt
Where did you get that lie about Wolfowitz outta your @ss?
Testimony today from Cohen revealed that the linkages between AQ and Iraq were known by the Clinton administration and were part of the justification for bombing the al-Shifa chemical plant in the Sudan. Clarke said the same thing back then.
Fortunately we have a REAL president in office now who determined to destroy the State sponsors of terrorism and Iraq was first on the list.
Wolfowitz was one of those determined to create a viable policy to deal with these lunatics rather than continue "swatting at flies" as the President said. Your pretense that he was indifferent to Bin Laden is low even for you. It is as much a lie as Clarke's contention that Dr. Rice didn't know what AQ was.
24 posted on
03/23/2004 2:31:30 PM PST by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
To: justshutupandtakeit
Isn't it grand to see the Clintonistas and the Chalabistas working together?
Clarke may or may not be "lying" about the Wolfowitz quote, though I tend to believe him on that issue, but we have already established that Rice is ill-equipped at vetting intelligence (her office allowed the ridiculous Niger Uranium claim into her boss's speech) and Wolfowitz is just a back stabbing liar as we say in early December when he betrayed his President on the international stage, so do you really have a leg to stand on or just an ever thinning rational to support unequivacllay the unsupportable?
28 posted on
03/23/2004 4:09:27 PM PST by
JohnGalt
('Who cares about a little terrorist in Afghanistan?'--Paul Wolfowitz 4/2001)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson