SCOTT'S STICKY TAPES

The NY Post ^ | 3/23/04 | Howard BREUER

[runningbear]

SCOTT'S STICKY TAPES

SCOTT'S STICKY TAPES

By HOWARD BREUER

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCOTT PETERSON "A host of lies."

March 23, 2004 -- REDWOOD CITY, Calif. - Jurors will be allowed to see TV interviews in which double-murder suspect Scott Peterson discusses his affair with Amber Frey and other aspects of the Laci Peterson case, a judge ruled yesterday.

Peterson's attorney, Mark Geragos, had tried to exclude the interviews with Diane Sawyer and other reporters, arguing that they were "spliced and diced."

But Judge Alfred Delucchi said the interviews could be offered to "show consciousness of guilt and evidence of the defendant's state of mind."

Prosecutor Rick Distaso said he wants to use the interviews to convince jurors that Peterson told "a whole host of lies to shift blame from himself."

For instance, Peterson, 31, told Sawyer that Frey was the only woman with whom he'd had an affair, but police later learned of at least one other affair early in the couple's marriage, Distaso has said.

In response to the remarks, Peterson leaned back and threw the prosecutor a disapproving glance.

A Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer close to Geragos said the TV tapes will make it a lot harder for jurors to believe that Peterson didn't kill his wife and unborn son - who washed up dead last April along the same body of water where Peterson said he went fishing the day Laci disappeared.

"Why should 12 jurors believe anything Peterson has to say when they could go back to one or more lies that he told?" said attorney Gregory Brenner. "That is going to be really big in coming back to haunt him at trial."

In recent motions, Distaso said he also wants to play tape of Peterson saying he told police about Frey on Christmas Eve 2002, hours after his pregnant wife disappeared. Police say they first learned of the affair from Frey when she contacted them six days later.

Peterson also told Sawyer that police likely found blood in the pickup truck they confiscated.

"I know for a fact there'd be plenty of blood in there from me. You know, I work on farms and you can take a look at my hands now and they have cuts all over them," the fertilizer salesman told Sawyer.

Also yesterday, Geragos declined to give the judge a list of witnesses who could .........

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jurors Will Be Able To See Peterson TV Interviews

Jurors Will Be Able To See Peterson TV Interviews

POSTED: 9:29 am PST March 22, 2004
UPDATED: 4:15 pm PST March 22, 2004

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. -- The jury at Scott Peterson's double-murder trial will be allowed to hear television interviews he did in the weeks after his wife's disappearance in which he discussed the search for Laci Peterson and admitted having an affair, a judge ruled Monday.

Defense attorney Mark Geragos had argued the interviews have no relevance in the case.

Video

Video On Demand: KTVU Legal Panel Discusses Peterson Change Of Venue Possibilities

Video

Video On Demands: Attorney Mark Geraqos Comments Outside Courthouse Monday

"The statements do not amount to admissions or confessions since they relate to collateral matters rather than the crime for which Mr. Peterson now stands falsely accused," Geragos wrote in a court filing.

Prosecutors allege Peterson lied repeatedly during the interviews.

"The defendant gives statements that conflict with those he told police, initially lies about his relationship with (massage therapist) Amber Frey, lies about his relationship with his wife ... and makes numerous admissions that evidence his guilt," prosecutors wrote in a Feb. 23 filing.

Judge Alfred A. Delucchi said the interviews can "show consciousness of guilt" and the "defendant's state of mind" and their "probative value outweighs any prejudicial value."

Prosecutors likely will introduce as evidence four TV interviews with Peterson -- one by Diane Sawyer of ABC News and three by Northern California stations.

Scott Peterson: The Interviews

Rowlands One-On-One With Scott Peterson (Part 1)
Rowlands One-On-One With Scott Peterson (Part 2)
Timeline: Laci Peterson Case

During the interviews, the prosecution alleges, Peterson lied about his relationship with his wife and about being cooperative and forthcoming with police.

In court documents, prosecutors claim Peterson implicated himself through a series of incongruous statements on camera:

-- Peterson said he fully cooperated with police and told officers on Christmas Eve about his affair with Frey. Prosecutors claim Peterson denied his relationship with Frey on Dec. 30, 2002 -- the day Frey first told police of the affair.

-- Peterson said he told his wife about the affair and she was "at peace" ............

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Behind-the-scenes attorneys are key in trial

Article Last Updated: Monday, March 22, 2004 - 5:15:18 AM PST

Lawyer Mark Geragos, center, and his defense team leaves the San Mateo Superior Court house during the lunch break of the pre-trial hearing for Scott Peterson in Redwood City, Calif., Monday March 1, 2004. Peterson is charged in the deaths of his pregnant wife, Laci, and their unborn son. (AP Photo/ Frederic Larson, Pool)

Behind-the-scenes attorneys are key in trial
Harris and Harris are the right-hand men

By Jason Dearen and Tim Hay, STAFF WRITERS

While defense attorney Mark Geragos and prosecutor Rick Distaso are the personalities that jurors will come to know in the Scott Peterson double-murder trial, they won't be the ones doing all the legal footwork.

The prosecution and defense each has a tough, competent lawyer riding shotgun -- one who helps shape the case well out of the limelight, and keeps track of the innumerable details that, taken together, could mean the difference between life and death for the defendant.

They're both named Harris. They will both be quiet and unassuming while the front men put on their cases for the jury, but behind the scenes, they are the bulldogs.

"The No. 2 attorney does the grunt work, like writing the boring motions," said Daniel Horowitz, an Oakland defense lawyer who has been following the Peterson case.

The second attorney also is key in organizing the volumes of information and doing the research that shapes legal arguments. Both attorneys declined to be interviewed for this story.

Contrasting styles ........

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson's attorney reaffirms client's innocence as first qualified juror selected

Posted on Mon, Mar. 22, 2004

Peterson's attorney reaffirms client's innocence as first qualified juror selected

By Brian Anderson

CONTRA COSTA TIMES

REDWOOD CITY - His partner suggested Scott Peterson was guilty. And his job pairs him at times with South Bay prosecutors.

Juror 4663 even has testified as an expert witness in the prosecution of polluters -- a detail not lost on defense attorney Mark Geragos.

"I'm a little concerned," Geragos told the man this morning. "You seem like a juror I would not want to have on the case."

Yet the environmental inspector with the City of San Jose said he believed he could fairly sit in judgment at Peterson's murder trial. Peterson, he agreed, is still innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

So it was today that the middle-age man with the soft tone and wire-rimmed glasses became the first juror to be qualified to serve on a panel that will be seated in Peterson's trial.

In fact, he was the only one of five prospective jurors called into the second floor courtroom here to make the cut today. The others, who said they were against the death penalty or against Peterson, were allowed out of the high-profile trial.

Chipping away

In what was the first day of individual jury questioning, Judge Alfred Delucchi and lawyers on both sides of the case began chipping away at 300 or so potential jurors remaining from a pool of 1,000 people initially summoned. Their goal is to find 80 people who could serve as jurors in what is expected to be a five or six month trial -- a task that started strong with Juror 4663's qualification but then seemed to stall...........

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the Peterson trial For many are called but few are chosen...
1 of 13 potential jurors makes it past first interview

the Peterson trial For many are called but few are chosen...
1 of 13 potential jurors makes it past first interview

Stacy Finz and Diana Walsh, Chronicle Staff Writers

Tuesday, March 23, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More than half didn't even make it inside the courtroom door.

And those who did, with just one exception, were booted about as fast as you can say Scott Peterson.

Seating a jury in the high-profile capital murder case got off to a rocky start Monday, the first day that prospective jurors were asked to go in for individual interviews with the judge and lawyers on the case. Thirteen were called.

But before the one-on-one questioning began, prosecutors and defense attorneys excused seven right off the bat. The dismissed jurors had made it clear, in a 23-page questionnaire they filled out two weeks ago, that they either couldn't keep an open mind in the case or had philosophical problems with the death penalty.

The remaining six were taken in one at a time to answer questions. Five of those were disqualified, too.

At least one of those said he thought Peterson was guilty and that he couldn't stay away from media reports of the case. Another said she could be fair and impartial, but that her work would pay her salary for only three of the six months the trial is expected to last.

One woman lasted less than a minute when she said she could not vote to execute another human being. Another woman said that if she found Peterson guilty of the charges, she would only recommend death and would not consider an optional punishment of life in prison.

In the end, just one man, an environmental investigator for the city of San Jose who helps prosecutors build cases against toxic polluters, was asked to return in six weeks for the final selection process. ..........

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Judge allows use of Scott Peterson TV interviews as evidence

Posted on Tue, Mar. 23, 2004

Judge allows use of Scott Peterson TV interviews as evidence

BRIAN SKOLOFF

Associated Press

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. - Television interviews Scott Peterson gave in the weeks after his wife's disappearance in which he discussed the search for Laci Peterson and admitted having an affair will be allowed to be used at his double-murder trial.

Judge Alfred A. Delucchi ruled Monday that the television interviews can "show consciousness of guilt" and the "defendant's state of mind."

Defense attorney Mark Geragos had argued the interviews have no relevance in the case.

"The statements do not amount to admissions or confessions since they relate to collateral matters rather than the crime for which Mr. Peterson now stands falsely accused," Geragos wrote in a court filing.

Prosecutors allege Peterson lied repeatedly during the interviews.

Also Monday, Geragos said he would wait before possibly seeking a second change of venue. A Stanislaus County judge moved the case from Modesto after finding an impartial jury could not be seated in Peterson's hometown.

"What we've decided to do is go through jury selection," Geragos said outside the courtroom, adding he would reevaluate later whether to seek a move.

Peterson could face the death penalty or life in prison without parole if convicted of murdering his pregnant wife and their unborn son.

Authorities allege he killed Laci Peterson on Dec. 23 or 24, 2002 because he was having an affair with a massage therapist, then dumped Laci's body in San Francisco Bay. The bodies of his wife and unborn son washed ashore nearly four months later.

Prosecutors likely will introduce as evidence four TV interviews with Peterson - one by Diane Sawyer of ABC News and three by Northern California stations.

During the interviews, the prosecution alleges, Peterson lied about his relationship with his wife and about being cooperative with police. Prosecutors claim Peterson implicated himself through a series of incongruous statements on camera:

_ Peterson said he told his wife about the affair and she was "at peace" with it. But witnesses will testify that Laci Peterson never mentioned the affair, and they "did not perceive any evidence of the affair" in the way the couple interacted, according to a prosecution filing........

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Canadian Outrage]

Oh my doesn't Sharon look like a blonde Laci in that picture? Wonderful!! The one thing that saddens me some tho is that Laci's real father ought to be in these pics as well. He took the death of HIS daughter very very hard!!

[Devil_Anse]

Look at that! Someone actually got a smile and a laugh out of poor Sharon, and that can't be bad!

[Devil_Anse]

"Herself"

I just realized you must mean Feinstein.

For a moment there, I thought Hillary had somehow interjected herself into this.

[Devil_Anse]

Did we really say "hunt down, capture, kill"? I hope so. I get sick of hearing "bring them to justice". The only justice in a case like this = kill them.

[uncitizen]

Yes, Laci looked so much like Sharon. It's obvious where Laci got that beautiful smile and love for life. That's all be taken away from Sharon now.

One thing is for sure, when Sharon takes the witness stand, it's all over for that double-murdering basturd.

[Canadian Outrage]

I agree!! I just read a thread on CTV outlining all the people in different trials that Geragos has accused of LYING. One guy from FOX mentioned it and said "I don't think it's funny either"!! and it isn't. This time, he's not defending a petty thief (Ryder),he's attempting to defend a BRUTAL, PREMEDITATING DOUBLE MURDERER. He's WAY OVER his head in this one.

[uncitizen]

Maybe Geragos is setting up as many circumstances for appeal that he can. And surely the judge is taking notice of this. And given the history Geragos has of making accusations like these, i don't think an appeal will be granted.

[Jackie-O]

Bennet said that...I'll see if I can find it. I know I heard it tho...

[Jackie-O]

Yes, Laci sure had that same beautiful heartwarming smile. I'm sure Connor (May he rest in Heaven with Laci) looks just like Mom and Nana!
Almost a year since Snott was arrested...trial needs to progress now. Sharon and the Rocha's need and deserve closure!

[Jackie-O]

Yep!! Every step he takes is anticipation of an appeal...

[Canadian Outrage]

I agree with uncitizen, the appeal angle isn't going anywhere. WHEN he's convicted and sentenced to death, the appeals are automatic anyway. This Judge is too damn smart for Geragos!! He's giving him a lot of rope to hang himself with.

[Jackie-O]

Yep, the appeal will go nowhere... but he's covering his bases..
Hey, I pinged you to the missing Madison case, I'll do it again. Come over and tell me what you think...from a SCOW'S prospective. It's definitely a SCOW case!

[Canadian Outrage]

I'll check it soon as I get home Jax. I'm just leaving now. BBS

[pinz-n-needlez]

I did mean Hillary. I was listening to the end of her interview on Air America, while I was watching Bush sign the L&C bill.

Sorry, that woman just invades my brain and I go nuts when I listen to her.

She interjects herself into just about everything. >:-0

Pinz
ps. She sounded like an utter moron, BTW. :->

[Velveeta]

4/12/04 GLOBE: LACI'S DAD: Exclusive Interview: I WANT SCOTT TO DIE

by David Thompson

synopsis

After the judge's stunning decision that everything Scott Peterson said in TV interviews can be used by the prosecution, the family of his slain wife Laci is outraged that he may now cop a plea and escape death row.

Laci's family and friends have been desperately hoping that Peterson, charged with her murder and the brutal slaying of their unborn child Conner, would stand trial, be convicted and then be forced to pay the ultimate price by lethal injection, in order to give then a sense of closure.

"I hope Scott gets the death penalty for what he's done," Laci's dad, Dennis Rocha, tells GLOBE in an exclusive interview.

But the family's hopes for the ultimate penalty were jeopardized March 22. That's when Redwood City, Calif., Judge Alfred Delucchi agreed to allow into evidence four incriminating television interviews Peterson gave before the bodies of his wife and child were discovered in the Bay.

Meanwhile, 31 year old Peterson has pleaded not guilty to two counts of first-degree murder.. charges that could lead to the death penalty for the former fertilizer salesman.

But now that Peterson seemingly has effectively signed his own death warrant with his unguarded on-camera comments, court observers say a plea bargain is more likely.

By referring to his then still missing wife Laci in the past tense during one interview-then quickly correcting himself- Peterson appeared to have signaled he was responsible for the murders. And that's just one of his many blunders.

"There seems to be so much damning evidence against Scott that it's hard to believe he can carry on fighting and fighting," says a close friend. "At some point, he's going to have a reality check and realize that chances are a jury will find him guilty of double murder."

Legal expert Craig Silverman agrees that Peterson will probably seek a deal with prosecutors.

"Scott could agree to charges of second-degree murder, which means he admits committing the murders, but crimes were not premeditated as the prosecution now insists," explains Silverman. "Ultimately, it's up to the judge to decide whether to accept a plea bargain, but most judges won't refuse that kind of request."

Another family friend tells, GLOBE, "Laci's parents deserve justice. They believe in an eye for an eye.. It would be a huge blow to them if Scott is allowed to go on living."

As prosecutors prepare to go to trial with mountains of evidence against Peterson, sources say that in the end, it will be his own televised words and brazen false statements that will seal his fate.

Attorney Silverman says that many of Scott's sound bites in interviews he gave could cost him his life. Silverman claims that Scott appears to have gotten a buzz out of being interviewed on TV and was more interested in massaging his own ego than anything else.

"At times he looked like he was exhilarated with being interviewed by a celebrity like Diane Sawyer," says Silverman. "Instead of seeking those kind of thrills, he should have been thinking about his missing wife."

Adds Rocha,"Scott has shot himself in his foot. He has always believed he has more smarts than everyone else and that we're all stupid. In reality he's the stupid one."

Ruth Jones, a criminal law professor at McGeorge School of Law in Sacramento, Calif., calls Peterson's controversial TV interviews damning.

"Peterson's own words will sink him and send him to death row," Jones tells GLOBE. "The prosecution will pick apart the interviews word by word so they can prove he's been lying all along."

"He thought he could save himself by doing those interviews but they actually sealed his fate."

[Velveeta]

Whoops! Forgot to say thank you to Rickamorti at Purgatory for typing out the above article.

[Dante3]

Geragos is only out for himself. His antics will turn off intelligent juroros. I would bet more than one jury takes such a dislike to him that they have to sruggle to look objectively at the case. His best hope is to get an OJ jury.

[Jackie-O]

Attorney Silverman says that many of Scott's sound bites in interviews he gave could cost him his life. Silverman claims that Scott appears to have gotten a buzz out of being interviewed on TV and was more interested in massaging his own ego than anything else. "At times he looked like he was exhilarated with being interviewed by a celebrity like Diane Sawyer," says Silverman. "Instead of seeking those kind of thrills, he should have been thinking about his missing wife."

The buzz has worn off...time to come back down to reality.

Sweet article if true...but I think Jackie will hold out till trial time to get her million dollars worth. :o)

[Jackie-O]

LOL!!!

[pinz-n-needlez]

Thank you Vel and Ricka.

I wouldn't mind if he pleaded guilty and was locked up forever. But he'd have to confess and tell what happened.

And Jackie and Lee lose a million dollars! lol

It won't bring back Laci and Connor, but neither will a trial and the death penalty. Sharon might receive a bit of consolation with Laci's Bill that will put away other lowlife husbands/fathers/murderers.

Pinz
(We could all point and laugh at him every Christmas Eve. It would sure beat lighting a Kwanzaa candle.)