SCOTT PETERSON "A host of lies."
Posted on 03/23/2004 5:30:59 AM PST by runningbear
SCOTT'S STICKY TAPES
By HOWARD BREUER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCOTT PETERSON "A host of lies."
March 23, 2004 -- REDWOOD CITY, Calif. - Jurors will be allowed to see TV interviews in which double-murder suspect Scott Peterson discusses his affair with Amber Frey and other aspects of the Laci Peterson case, a judge ruled yesterday.
Peterson's attorney, Mark Geragos, had tried to exclude the interviews with Diane Sawyer and other reporters, arguing that they were "spliced and diced."
But Judge Alfred Delucchi said the interviews could be offered to "show consciousness of guilt and evidence of the defendant's state of mind."
Prosecutor Rick Distaso said he wants to use the interviews to convince jurors that Peterson told "a whole host of lies to shift blame from himself."
For instance, Peterson, 31, told Sawyer that Frey was the only woman with whom he'd had an affair, but police later learned of at least one other affair early in the couple's marriage, Distaso has said.
In response to the remarks, Peterson leaned back and threw the prosecutor a disapproving glance.
A Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer close to Geragos said the TV tapes will make it a lot harder for jurors to believe that Peterson didn't kill his wife and unborn son - who washed up dead last April along the same body of water where Peterson said he went fishing the day Laci disappeared.
"Why should 12 jurors believe anything Peterson has to say when they could go back to one or more lies that he told?" said attorney Gregory Brenner. "That is going to be really big in coming back to haunt him at trial."
In recent motions, Distaso said he also wants to play tape of Peterson saying he told police about Frey on Christmas Eve 2002, hours after his pregnant wife disappeared. Police say they first learned of the affair from Frey when she contacted them six days later.
Peterson also told Sawyer that police likely found blood in the pickup truck they confiscated.
"I know for a fact there'd be plenty of blood in there from me. You know, I work on farms and you can take a look at my hands now and they have cuts all over them," the fertilizer salesman told Sawyer.
Also yesterday, Geragos declined to give the judge a list of witnesses who could .........
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jurors Will Be Able To See Peterson TV Interviews
Jurors Will Be Able To See Peterson TV Interviews
POSTED: 9:29 am PST March 22, 2004
UPDATED: 4:15 pm PST March 22, 2004
REDWOOD CITY, Calif. -- The jury at Scott Peterson's double-murder trial will be allowed to hear television interviews he did in the weeks after his wife's disappearance in which he discussed the search for Laci Peterson and admitted having an affair, a judge ruled Monday.
Defense attorney Mark Geragos had argued the interviews have no relevance in the case.
Video
Video On Demand: KTVU Legal Panel Discusses Peterson Change Of Venue Possibilities
Video
Video On Demands: Attorney Mark Geraqos Comments Outside Courthouse Monday
"The statements do not amount to admissions or confessions since they relate to collateral matters rather than the crime for which Mr. Peterson now stands falsely accused," Geragos wrote in a court filing.
Prosecutors allege Peterson lied repeatedly during the interviews.
"The defendant gives statements that conflict with those he told police, initially lies about his relationship with (massage therapist) Amber Frey, lies about his relationship with his wife ... and makes numerous admissions that evidence his guilt," prosecutors wrote in a Feb. 23 filing.
Judge Alfred A. Delucchi said the interviews can "show consciousness of guilt" and the "defendant's state of mind" and their "probative value outweighs any prejudicial value."
Prosecutors likely will introduce as evidence four TV interviews with Peterson -- one by Diane Sawyer of ABC News and three by Northern California stations.
Scott Peterson: The Interviews
Rowlands One-On-One With Scott Peterson (Part 1)
Rowlands One-On-One With Scott Peterson (Part 2)
Timeline: Laci Peterson Case
During the interviews, the prosecution alleges, Peterson lied about his relationship with his wife and about being cooperative and forthcoming with police.
In court documents, prosecutors claim Peterson implicated himself through a series of incongruous statements on camera:
-- Peterson said he fully cooperated with police and told officers on Christmas Eve about his affair with Frey. Prosecutors claim Peterson denied his relationship with Frey on Dec. 30, 2002 -- the day Frey first told police of the affair.
-- Peterson said he told his wife about the affair and she was "at peace" ............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Behind-the-scenes attorneys are key in trial
Article Last Updated: Monday, March 22, 2004 - 5:15:18 AM PST
Lawyer Mark Geragos, center, and his defense team leaves the San Mateo Superior Court house during the lunch break of the pre-trial hearing for Scott Peterson in Redwood City, Calif., Monday March 1, 2004. Peterson is charged in the deaths of his pregnant wife, Laci, and their unborn son. (AP Photo/ Frederic Larson, Pool)
Behind-the-scenes attorneys are key in trial
Harris and Harris are the right-hand men
By Jason Dearen and Tim Hay, STAFF WRITERS
While defense attorney Mark Geragos and prosecutor Rick Distaso are the personalities that jurors will come to know in the Scott Peterson double-murder trial, they won't be the ones doing all the legal footwork.
The prosecution and defense each has a tough, competent lawyer riding shotgun -- one who helps shape the case well out of the limelight, and keeps track of the innumerable details that, taken together, could mean the difference between life and death for the defendant.
They're both named Harris. They will both be quiet and unassuming while the front men put on their cases for the jury, but behind the scenes, they are the bulldogs.
"The No. 2 attorney does the grunt work, like writing the boring motions," said Daniel Horowitz, an Oakland defense lawyer who has been following the Peterson case.
The second attorney also is key in organizing the volumes of information and doing the research that shapes legal arguments. Both attorneys declined to be interviewed for this story.
Contrasting styles ........
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peterson's attorney reaffirms client's innocence as first qualified juror selected
Posted on Mon, Mar. 22, 2004
Peterson's attorney reaffirms client's innocence as first qualified juror selected
By Brian Anderson
CONTRA COSTA TIMES
REDWOOD CITY - His partner suggested Scott Peterson was guilty. And his job pairs him at times with South Bay prosecutors.
Juror 4663 even has testified as an expert witness in the prosecution of polluters -- a detail not lost on defense attorney Mark Geragos.
"I'm a little concerned," Geragos told the man this morning. "You seem like a juror I would not want to have on the case."
Yet the environmental inspector with the City of San Jose said he believed he could fairly sit in judgment at Peterson's murder trial. Peterson, he agreed, is still innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
So it was today that the middle-age man with the soft tone and wire-rimmed glasses became the first juror to be qualified to serve on a panel that will be seated in Peterson's trial.
In fact, he was the only one of five prospective jurors called into the second floor courtroom here to make the cut today. The others, who said they were against the death penalty or against Peterson, were allowed out of the high-profile trial.
Chipping away
In what was the first day of individual jury questioning, Judge Alfred Delucchi and lawyers on both sides of the case began chipping away at 300 or so potential jurors remaining from a pool of 1,000 people initially summoned. Their goal is to find 80 people who could serve as jurors in what is expected to be a five or six month trial -- a task that started strong with Juror 4663's qualification but then seemed to stall...........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the Peterson trial For many are called but few are chosen...
1 of 13 potential jurors makes it past first interview
Stacy Finz and Diana Walsh, Chronicle Staff Writers
Tuesday, March 23, 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More than half didn't even make it inside the courtroom door.
And those who did, with just one exception, were booted about as fast as you can say Scott Peterson.
Seating a jury in the high-profile capital murder case got off to a rocky start Monday, the first day that prospective jurors were asked to go in for individual interviews with the judge and lawyers on the case. Thirteen were called.
But before the one-on-one questioning began, prosecutors and defense attorneys excused seven right off the bat. The dismissed jurors had made it clear, in a 23-page questionnaire they filled out two weeks ago, that they either couldn't keep an open mind in the case or had philosophical problems with the death penalty.
The remaining six were taken in one at a time to answer questions. Five of those were disqualified, too.
At least one of those said he thought Peterson was guilty and that he couldn't stay away from media reports of the case. Another said she could be fair and impartial, but that her work would pay her salary for only three of the six months the trial is expected to last.
One woman lasted less than a minute when she said she could not vote to execute another human being. Another woman said that if she found Peterson guilty of the charges, she would only recommend death and would not consider an optional punishment of life in prison.
In the end, just one man, an environmental investigator for the city of San Jose who helps prosecutors build cases against toxic polluters, was asked to return in six weeks for the final selection process. ..........
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge allows use of Scott Peterson TV interviews as evidence
Posted on Tue, Mar. 23, 2004
Judge allows use of Scott Peterson TV interviews as evidence
BRIAN SKOLOFF
Associated Press
REDWOOD CITY, Calif. - Television interviews Scott Peterson gave in the weeks after his wife's disappearance in which he discussed the search for Laci Peterson and admitted having an affair will be allowed to be used at his double-murder trial.
Judge Alfred A. Delucchi ruled Monday that the television interviews can "show consciousness of guilt" and the "defendant's state of mind."
Defense attorney Mark Geragos had argued the interviews have no relevance in the case.
"The statements do not amount to admissions or confessions since they relate to collateral matters rather than the crime for which Mr. Peterson now stands falsely accused," Geragos wrote in a court filing.
Prosecutors allege Peterson lied repeatedly during the interviews.
Also Monday, Geragos said he would wait before possibly seeking a second change of venue. A Stanislaus County judge moved the case from Modesto after finding an impartial jury could not be seated in Peterson's hometown.
"What we've decided to do is go through jury selection," Geragos said outside the courtroom, adding he would reevaluate later whether to seek a move.
Peterson could face the death penalty or life in prison without parole if convicted of murdering his pregnant wife and their unborn son.
Authorities allege he killed Laci Peterson on Dec. 23 or 24, 2002 because he was having an affair with a massage therapist, then dumped Laci's body in San Francisco Bay. The bodies of his wife and unborn son washed ashore nearly four months later.
Prosecutors likely will introduce as evidence four TV interviews with Peterson - one by Diane Sawyer of ABC News and three by Northern California stations.
During the interviews, the prosecution alleges, Peterson lied about his relationship with his wife and about being cooperative with police. Prosecutors claim Peterson implicated himself through a series of incongruous statements on camera:
_ Peterson said he told his wife about the affair and she was "at peace" with it. But witnesses will testify that Laci Peterson never mentioned the affair, and they "did not perceive any evidence of the affair" in the way the couple interacted, according to a prosecution filing........
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Q Attorney: Ma'am, it has been said that you have formed an opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant; is that true?
A Lady: Yes, sir.
Q Attorney: And that is?
A Lady: He's guilty.
Q Attorney: When did you form that opinion, ma'am, if you don't mind my asking?
A Lady: When I heard Mark Geragos say he was on Larry King Live.
[Can you tell I do this for a living? :-)]
President is signing Laci and Conner's law today
Excerpt:
President is signing Laci and Conner's law today
By JOHN COTÉ
BEE STAFF WRITER
Last Updated: April 1, 2004, 07:28:00 AM PST
Laci Peterson's mother and step-father are in Washington, D.C., today to watch the president sign legislation dubbed Laci and Conner's law, which makes killing a fetus a federal crime.
The names in the unofficial title refer to the slain Modesto woman and her unborn son. The real title is the Unborn Victims of Violence Act.
President Bush is expected to sign the bill at a White House ceremony this afternoon, White House spokesman Ken Lisaius said.
Also due to attend are Rep. Dennis Cardoza, D-Merced, and other legislators who supported the bill, a Cardoza spokesman said.
The signing will be a poignant triumph for Peterson's mother and step- father, Sharon Rocha and Ron Grantski of Modesto, who lobbied for the bill.
Grantski said Wednesday night they would gladly trade their legislative victory to have their daughter and grandson here today.
"Your lives are just changed forever," said Grantski, who flew to the capital Wednesday with his wife.
The legislation rekindled the abortion debate in Congress, with abortion-rights supporters protesting what they see as the bill's assertion that life begins at conception.
The bill says the criminal statute applies to the harming of "a child who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place" and further specifies this "child" to be "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."
"The intervention of Sharon Rocha and Ron Grantski was, I believe, very important," said Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee, an abortion- opposition group that backed the measure. Rocha delivered taped messages, wrote letters and made appearances on Capitol Hill, he added.
The law makes harming a fetus during the commission of other federal crimes a separate offense. That would permit, for example, two murder charges to be brought against someone who kills a pregnant woman on federal property, such as a national park or military base.
Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California had proposed an amendment to toughen penalties for attacks on pregnant women, without defining when life begins or mentioning the word "fetus."
The amendment fell one vote short.
"I certainly don't hesitate to say that it would not have happened had it not been for Sharon Rocha's intervention," Johnson said.
Twenty-nine states, including California, have fetal homicide laws. Under California's statute, Peterson's husband, Scott, is being prosecuted on two counts of murder in the deaths of his wife and son.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.