To: Diogenesis; cyborg
I have mixed feelings. Gross anatomy is a rite of passage as well as a fundamental learning experience. However, mri and multidector ct multiplanar imaging are extremely effective teaching tools. I would guess that gross anatomy lab will go the way of the house call.
11 posted on
03/22/2004 11:45:52 PM PST by
Maynerd
To: Maynerd
gross anatomy=eight track cassette basically :-)
12 posted on
03/22/2004 11:47:09 PM PST by
cyborg
(sheretz mekori notef mugla's dead score one for civilization!)
To: Maynerd
Hopefully not. I am a physician and I will tell you that there is nothing that compares to anatomy being taught with cadavers. I had seen anatomy slides, pictures, movies, etc. my entire life before med school, but had no concept of how things fit together until I saw it in real life. Virtually no one would be able to picture these structures in 3-D unless they saw them in person. In fact some of my fellow students who planned on going into surgical specialties took an elective dissection their senior year.
14 posted on
03/23/2004 12:59:05 AM PST by
boop
To: Maynerd
CT and MRI are no substitute for actually seeing the real anatomy. They do not give the proper spatial perspective, and without having a minds-eye view of the real thing, how can a student/trainee correlate the images with the anatomy?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson