Skip to comments.
Saddam, women's rights
The Washington Times ^
| March 22, 2004
| Nat Hentoff
Posted on 03/22/2004 7:58:15 PM PST by neverdem
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:41:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
At the Brookings Institution in Washington on Feb. 25, New York Sen. Hillary Clinton charged that, with Saddam Hussein gone, there have been "pullbacks" in the rights Iraqi women enjoyed under his rule. Not even such bellicose critics of the war as Sen. Ted Kennedy have claimed that the regime change has cost women in Iraq the leading defender of their rights.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: hillary; hillaryclinton; honorkillings; iraq; iraqiwomen; johnburns; muslimwomen; nathentoff; saddam; saddamhandmaidens; women; womensrights
Go, get her Nat.
1
posted on
03/22/2004 7:58:16 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
"As long as they stayed out of his way"??? It did not take very much to get in the "way" of Saddam...
2
posted on
03/22/2004 9:17:19 PM PST
by
Frank_2001
(and not a good idea to get in HER way either!;))
To: Frank_2001
According to the Soviet Constitution, any citizen had the right to critisize the government. Good luck doing that under Stalin.
To: neverdem
4
posted on
03/22/2004 9:46:20 PM PST
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: Diogenesis
Thanks for the pics.
5
posted on
03/22/2004 10:00:06 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
I remember telling my girlfriend about Hitlery's little speech about women's rights under Saddam. She damn near exploded over that one.
Also, I remember when we were out Freeping an pro-Saddam demonstration last March. My girlfriend was getting right up in the faces of those ignorant hippies and demanding justification for the rape rooms and public beheadings.
An hour later the bombing of Baghdad began.
6
posted on
03/23/2004 6:22:09 AM PST
by
FierceDraka
(Service and Glory!)
To: neverdem; Admin Moderator
Suggestion: use brackets to explain what the article is really about, in this case Hillary's incredible statements.
I would have added [Hillary Lies for Saddam!] or something similar to the original header.
You would have attracted lots more comments.
Perhaps the nice mod will add something to the headline so this gets the attention it deserves.
7
posted on
03/24/2004 5:08:00 AM PST
by
aculeus
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson