Skip to comments.
CLARKE IN 92: BUSH WAS LAX ON IRAQ
The Washington Post (BRIEF EXCERPT ONLY, IN COMPLIANCE WITH COPYRIGHT LAW AND LAT/WP VS FR]
| JUNE 5, 1992
| R. Jeffrey Smith
Posted on 03/22/2004 4:59:03 PM PST by Wallaby
Memo Says U.S. Was Lax on Iraq; 'No One Was Paying Attention' to Arms [EXCERPT] The Washington Post
R. Jeffrey Smith, Washington Post Staff Writer
FIRST SECTION; PAGE A1
June 5, 1992, Friday, Final Edition
A senior State Department official concluded in a secret memorandum after Iraq invaded Kuwait that "no one was paying attention" to blocking Iraq's purchase of Western equipment for weapons of mass destruction during the previous decade, according to a copy obtained by The Washington Post.
[According to Clarke's memo,] "no one was paying attention" to blocking Iraq's purchase of Western equipment for weapons of mass destruction during the previous decade. . ."
|
The official, Assistant Secretary of State Richard A. Clarke, made the claim in a memo declassified yesterday and provided to Congress along with 53 other State Department documents concerning U.S.-Iraqi relations that were requested by a congressional committee investigating U.S. policy toward Iraq before the Persian Gulf War. The documents, which were made available to The Post by a U.S. official, provide fresh details about the administration's monitoring of Iraq's nuclear and chemical weapons programs and the controversial U.S. pre-war push to ease controls on high-technology exports as part of an attempt to cultivate better relations with Iraq before it invaded Kuwait in August 1990. |
(snip) President Bush last night defended the effort toward better relations with Iraq against this congressional criticism, saying that the United States tried to work with Saddam "on grain credits and things of this nature to avoid aggressive action. And it failed. . . . " "That approach, holding out a hand, trying to get him to renounce terrorism and join the family of nations, didn't work," Bush told a White House news conference. "And the minute he moved aggressively, we moved aggressively and set back aggression." One undated memo summarizing U.S. nonproliferation activity aimed at Iraq indicates that the Bush administration moved slowly to constrain Iraq's mass-destruction weapons programs after a Iraqi long-range missile launch in 1989 caught officials by surprise. The memo states that Clarke sought in an interagency meeting that December "to get at why U.S. intelligence didn't know Iraq had such capabilities beforehand and to galvanize the interagency community into more effective [action] against the Iraqi missile program." (snip) Clarke's memo referring to Washington's record of failure on the issue was written after the invasion. . . (snip)
|
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1992; 2004; 2020; clarke; hindsight; iraq; richardaclarke; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-244 next last
1
posted on
03/22/2004 4:59:04 PM PST
by
Wallaby
To: Wallaby
But ... but... Iraq didn't have WMDs.
Good find.
To: Wallaby
Man, the credibility of these guys doesn't last very long under scrutiny, does it?
3
posted on
03/22/2004 5:01:49 PM PST
by
AmishDude
To: Wallaby
Anyone see a pattern here?
4
posted on
03/22/2004 5:02:09 PM PST
by
yeswecan
To: Wallaby
Is this online anywhere?
5
posted on
03/22/2004 5:03:12 PM PST
by
Columbine
(Bush '04 - Owens '08)
To: Wallaby
6
posted on
03/22/2004 5:03:24 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: Wallaby
Not for commercial use. Solely to be used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion.
7
posted on
03/22/2004 5:03:41 PM PST
by
Wallaby
To: yeswecan
Is there an echo in here?
8
posted on
03/22/2004 5:03:43 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Wallaby
Clarke's memo referring to Washington's record of failure on the issue was written after the invasion. . .
Hell, even I could have wrote that memo AFTER.....
9
posted on
03/22/2004 5:03:58 PM PST
by
stylin19a
(Is it vietnam yet ?)
To: Columbine
It's on Lexis-Nexis. Any newsroom could pull it up.
10
posted on
03/22/2004 5:05:17 PM PST
by
Wallaby
To: AmishDude; dirtboy; MJY1288
Man, the credibility of these guys doesn't last very long under scrutiny, does it?Evidently these people are not familir with this little ditty:
11
posted on
03/22/2004 5:05:19 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: stylin19a
Hell, even I could have wrote that memo AFTER.....I agree.
Put your name in for the next Asst. Sec. of State opening..
To: 1Mike; 3catsanadog; ~Vor~; ~Kim4VRWC's~; A CA Guy; A Citizen Reporter; abner; Aeronaut; AFPhys; ...
This is TOO FUNNY!!!!
13
posted on
03/22/2004 5:07:13 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Wallaby
This is an excellent find, Wallaby.
14
posted on
03/22/2004 5:07:42 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Wallaby
Little Dickie Clarke and his appearance on 60 Maggots got hammered on talk Radio today. Great post...
15
posted on
03/22/2004 5:08:42 PM PST
by
tubebender
(My wild oats have turned to shredded wheat...)
To: Wallaby
Excellent find.
16
posted on
03/22/2004 5:08:50 PM PST
by
maggief
To: M. Thatcher; Real Rush
FYI
17
posted on
03/22/2004 5:08:50 PM PST
by
Wallaby
To: Howlin
It's really over for the Dems, isn't it? Ordinary people do research on the WWW and Fox News picks up the story. No more media blackouts.
To: Wallaby; Askel5
Wallaby bump!
To: Howlin
I want to know if Dick Clarke hangs around with Kevin Phillips.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-244 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson