[Your Nightmare]

I wouldn't really classify 138.5 million as "record shattering" when there were 137.8 million when he took office. That's only a net increase of 776,000. For comparison, during the same period of their presidencies, Clinton had 6 million, Bush I had 1.27 million, and Reagan had 3.2 million.

BTW, that 138.5 million of Bush's is now 138.3.

[FreeReign]

I wouldn't really classify 138.5 million as "record shattering" when there were 137.8 million when he took office.

Household survey says about 136.9 million jobs when he took office. Not the figure you gave.

[FreeReign]

I wouldn't really classify 138.5 million as "record shattering" when there were 137.8 million when he took office.

Household survey says about 136.9 million jobs when he took office. Not the figure you gave.

[dodger]

I wouldn't really classify 138.5 million as "record shattering" when there were 137.8 million when he took office.

Nice try, but it seems 138.5M is record employment even if 'shattery' is rather subjective.

Now, do tell why you would yelp as if MORE JOBS and the SAME UNEMPLOYMENT RATE with W & Beelzebubba is a bad thing. Do you wish to cover for the DemoKerrys whilst they screech about 'record job losses'?

What's Your NIGHTMARISH angle??