To: Prolifeconservative
"So the bottom line..." I don't agree with it but their timing may be more a focus on getting a different justice, or justices, in the SCOTUS rather than a true "political" position.
If it's done now and loses it occurs to me that reduces the possibility of it being heard in the future when there's a more friendly SCOTUS.
To: Proud_texan
"I don't agree with it but their timing may be more a focus on getting a different justice, or justices, in the SCOTUS rather than a true "political" position."
Political position, different justices on the SCOTUS.....it's all one in the same.
Keep in mind, they (NRTL) are rolling the dice that Bush will be re-elected AND he will appoint a new Justice sometime soon in his new term to grease the skids for overturning Roe V. Wade. Imagine IF Kerry is elected, then where are we.
Every time you press this issue into the political and public domain you gain on this issue. This issue needs to say in the spotlight, because the TRUTH shall set some baby free who might have otherwise been aborted.
32 posted on
03/23/2004 3:51:53 PM PST by
Prolifeconservative
(If there is another terrorist attack, the womb is a very unsafe place to hide.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson