Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'It's time to get rid of income taxes'
Daily Nonpareil ^ | 03/20/2004 | TIM ROHWER , Staff Writer

Posted on 03/22/2004 6:47:25 AM PST by ancient_geezer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

"The cost of enforcing the \par IRS (Internal Revenue Service) is over $1 trillion a year," \par King said during a visit to Council Bluffs. "We're consuming 9 percent of our Gross National Product just with the IRS. It's time to get rid of income taxes, implode the entire thing."


1 posted on 03/22/2004 6:47:25 AM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Taxreform; Taxman; Principled; Bigun; EternalVigilance; kevkrom; n-tres-ted; Poohbah; CliffC; ...
A Taxreform bump for you all.

If you would like to be added to this ping list let me know.

John Linder in the House & Saxby Chambliss Senate, offer a comprehensive bill to kill all income and payroll taxes outright, and provide a IRS free replacement in the form of a pure consumption tax:

H.R.25, S.1493
A bill to promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national retail sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.

Refer: http://www.fairtax.org & http://www.salestax.org


2 posted on 03/22/2004 6:48:21 AM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Fair Tax Bump.
3 posted on 03/22/2004 6:49:49 AM PST by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
"The cost of enforcing the \par IRS (Internal Revenue Service) is over $1 trillion a year," \par King said during a visit to Council Bluffs. "We're consuming 9 percent of our Gross National Product just with the IRS. It's time to get rid of income taxes, implode the entire thing."

He needs to provide a source for this data. I'd love to see one.

4 posted on 03/22/2004 6:50:18 AM PST by Maceman (Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
"The cost of enforcing the \par IRS (Internal Revenue Service) is over $1 trillion a year," \par King said during a visit to Council Bluffs. "We're consuming 9 percent of our Gross National Product just with the IRS. It's time to get rid of income taxes, implode the entire thing."

I support getting rid of the income tax, but this $1 trillion a year seems way out of whack. That would mean that almost half of the federal budget would be going to IRS enforcement, and I just don't by it. He might be adding in the loss of productivity, and the cost that people pay accountants and advisorts, but he needs to say that if he has the numbers to back it up.

5 posted on 03/22/2004 6:53:22 AM PST by Maceman (Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
please ping me!!!!
6 posted on 03/22/2004 6:53:55 AM PST by fishbabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Despite the tax cuts, no marriage penalty, more of an exemption for a child.... yada yada yada... my husband and I STILL owed money this year... time to get RID of the income tax before it breaks us all.
7 posted on 03/22/2004 6:53:56 AM PST by bearkat (John F. Kerry = oxyMORON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Please add me to your ping.... thanks!
8 posted on 03/22/2004 6:55:01 AM PST by bearkat (John F. Kerry = oxyMORON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Wasn't there a study years ago that showed if there was a national sales tax of 8-9% that the government would have several hundred billion dollars leftover after current spending? It would put a lot of lawyers and accountants out of work. I think the 8-9% applied to everyone with no breaks for charities, poor, etc... . My biggest fear is that you could write 10,000 pages of new tax code for the version listed in this article.
9 posted on 03/22/2004 7:10:34 AM PST by aegiscg47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

but this $1 trillion a year seems way out of whack.

I presume he is talking about he cost of tax compliance, as defined by Payne in '95. Works out to be over $1Trillion today.

OUR COSTLY INCOME-TAX SYSTEM

Every time Washington collects a dollar in tax revenues, taxpayers shell out that dollar plus another 65 cents. Why is that? It's not that the IRS is inefficient.

That agency's expenses eat up less than a penny of each dollar it raises. The 65 cents is what it costs taxpayers -- businesses and individuals -- to pony up each dollar. Compliance costs, which come to 24 cents, include the expense of keeping records, staying current with the tax code, and filling out the forms. Enforcement costs, close to 2 cents, include tax-???payers' expense for audits and litigation. We spend 3 cents on tax evasion and avoidance. However, the biggest expense item, at 33 cents, is economic disincentive. "By taking away the fruits of labor and capital," says political economist James L. Payne in his book Costly Returns, "the tax system works to discourage working and investing." So the next time Washington announces a, say, $10-billion program, remember that the real cost is that plus 65 cents per dollar -- or $6.5 billion more.

Costs of the Federal Tax System to Taxpayers for Every Dollar of Revenues Collected

Compliance costs 24¢
Enforcement costs
Disincentive to production 33¢
Disincentive cost of tax uncertainty
Evasion and avoidance cost
Government cost
Total 65¢

Source: Costly Returns, by James L. Payne (ICS Press, San Francisco, 1993). n


10 posted on 03/22/2004 7:10:34 AM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aegiscg47
See reply #10.
11 posted on 03/22/2004 7:12:36 AM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Please add me to your ping
12 posted on 03/22/2004 7:14:21 AM PST by Not a 60s Hippy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fishbabe; bearkat
Your are on the pinger :O)
13 posted on 03/22/2004 7:14:35 AM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
TWENTY-THREE PERCENT CONSUMPTION TAX???!?!?!?!?!

By the time you add taxes and fees that aren't in the actual revenue code and state sales tax, you're back to the old rate. I envision a lot of stuff "falling off trucks" nationwide.

14 posted on 03/22/2004 7:19:27 AM PST by IYAS9YAS (Go Fast, Turn Left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
2 issues:

1) He specifically states that it costs $1 trillion to "enforce" the tax laws. Enforcement is nomhere near that figure.

2) The 65% figure is highly dependant on the 33% of "production disincentive", which is not anything that can be acurately measured.
15 posted on 03/22/2004 7:21:52 AM PST by sharktrager (Kerry is like that or so a crack sausage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
I presume he is talking about he cost of tax compliance,

I'm glad you beat me to it, you have the data to back it up. ;-)

16 posted on 03/22/2004 7:22:54 AM PST by StriperSniper (Manuel Miranda - Whistleblower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
"He might be adding in the loss of productivity, and the cost that people pay accountants and advisors, but he needs to say that if he has the numbers to back it up."

I believe that he is and I agree that I would love to see some hard figures on this issue. All of these compliance costs act as a hidden tax burden on every good and service that we use and needs to be eliminated if we ever hope to regain our competitiveness in the global market.

17 posted on 03/22/2004 7:44:06 AM PST by Desron13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Strongly agree.

I do think some clever planning must be given to what to do with the ex IRS agents!

And, it needs to be attractive enough to get them on the side of those of us wanting to do that system in.
18 posted on 03/22/2004 7:49:15 AM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
It seems to me . . .

that a major feature of maintaining the IRS

is the

INTRUSIVE CONTROL FUNCTION OF SUCH A GROUP OF . . . uhhh . . . agents.

Shrillery certainly made the most of it and probably still does.

That may be harder to pry loose than the revenue aspect.
19 posted on 03/22/2004 7:51:41 AM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
I'd like to be added to the PING list.
20 posted on 03/22/2004 7:58:29 AM PST by beaversmom (Michael Medved has the Greatest radio show on GOD's Green Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson