[governsleastgovernsbest]

I repeat: did you read the original thread wherein it was mentioned that on 60 Minutes Clarke claimed "it is "outrageous" that W is running for re-election on the basis of strong leadership on national security, whereas he in fact did a poor job."?

I repeat: do you really think that anyone who makes a statement like that could possibly be, as you surmise, a "Bush supporter"?

I would encourage you at this point to read more and post less. This will be my last response to you for the time being.

[rantaway]

read that.

doesn't mean he didnt' support him in 2000. i am looking for facts (REAL FACTS) not opinions on this guy.

this is too important to me. if he has an agenda, i want to expose it. so far i haven't read much about him. God forbid, if he is right, i want to know that too.