Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Gave Green Light for Iraq to Invade Kuwait
Arabic-Media ^ | March 3,2003 | Untitled

Posted on 03/21/2004 7:15:26 AM PST by Pan_Yan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
This text is actually a internal link from a page of Iraqi history. I hadn't heard this story before. (I know it's from the Arabic Media, don't flame me)

I was doing some research on where Iraq's present boundaries came from when I stumbled on this page.
1 posted on 03/21/2004 7:15:26 AM PST by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
This is so, like, last Bush Administration.

Hard to know exactly what the truth was around that meeting. However, it set Saddam down a path of chronic misjudgement of what actions American was willing to take against him. You would have thunk that sooner or later the despot would have gotten the picture.

2 posted on 03/21/2004 7:18:13 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
This story made the rounds long long ago. It's total BS. Someone please pull this thread.
3 posted on 03/21/2004 7:20:16 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zook
Don't pull it. Let it get debunked. That's more useful, isn't it? I've heard the allegation before, I'd be interested to see some citations refuting it.
4 posted on 03/21/2004 7:21:49 AM PST by prion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: prion
This rumor has been around since the fall of 1990. (1990 fell with a crash.)
5 posted on 03/21/2004 7:22:42 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: prion
Agree
6 posted on 03/21/2004 7:22:47 AM PST by pitinkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
The link to this article is under to words the go ahead in the section titled Saddam Hussein and the invasion of Kuwait. It is about 4/5 of the way down the page.
7 posted on 03/21/2004 7:23:02 AM PST by Pan_Yan (I think the first Mars colony should have 535 members.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
These transcripts, or something very like them, were released before, during the first President Bush's presidency.

As you can see if you read them very carefully, the conversation with April Glaspie is ambiguous, although Saddam seems to have taken her words as a permission.

At the time, April Glaspie was blamed for screwing up and giving Saddam a false impression that he had permission to invade Kuwait. What the actual facts were we may never know.

It should also be remembered that there was a war going on then between Iran and Iraq. Iran was considered our worse enemy, Iraq was a fractious ally.

That was one reason why Bush I didn't finish the war with Saddam--balance of power politics. It was thought that if Saddam was crushed and his army destroyed, Iran would move into the power vacuum and take over the Middle East. In fact, that made a good deal of sense. We had no desire to go in there ourselves for the long term, which meant that preserving the balance of power was the only alternative.
8 posted on 03/21/2004 7:23:41 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
I hadn't heard this story before.

Ok no flame.

But I do remember this and it was debunked a long time ago.

You can probably find some threads on it if you search.

9 posted on 03/21/2004 7:23:47 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proudly out of step with the majority since 1973)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
The inept bunglings of Ambassador Glaspie are well documented.

Saddam was lead down the wrong path twice:
FIRST by Mzzz Glaspie.
SECOND by the French, leading to his ultimate demise.

Of course his own policy of murdering anyone who gave him a realistic interpretation of world events may have been also contributory.

10 posted on 03/21/2004 7:24:43 AM PST by evad (Such an enemy cannot be deterred, detained, appeased, or negotiated with. It can only be destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
I hadn't heard this story before.

Old slam on W's daddy. Saddam may have understood creatively, but GHWB didn't authorize and was not pleased when Saddam took Kuwait.

11 posted on 03/21/2004 7:25:30 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
Even if the dialogue quoted above was verbatim (which I highly doubt), it is still quite a stretch to make the case from those conversations that the United States endorsed the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.
12 posted on 03/21/2004 7:25:47 AM PST by SamAdams76 (I'm voting for John Kerry until I vote against him in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
This story was widely reported during and immediately following the first Gulf War. In fact, unless the onset of senior citizenship has caused me recollection dementia, I believe there were some congressional hearings on this FUBAR. In any case, the matter is non sequitur.
13 posted on 03/21/2004 7:28:07 AM PST by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
!

14 posted on 03/21/2004 7:28:10 AM PST by Fiddlstix (This Space Available for Rent or Lease by the Day, Week, or Month. Reasonable Rates. Inquire within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
I should add that it's very hard to conceive why Bush would have given Saddam permission to go ahead. At the time it was clear that Saddam's real goal was Saudi Arabia. He would have knifed right through Kuwait and taken over the Saudi oil fields if we hadn't intervened.

For that reason, the most credible explanation is that April Glaspie simply didn't make it clear enough to Saddam that he would not be allowed to invade Kuwait. Usually the job of an ambassador is to get along with her hosts. Plus Saddam was a megalomaniac who may well have misinterpreted her warnings because they were not explicit enough. He has always thought that he was destined to conquer and rule.
15 posted on 03/21/2004 7:29:13 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
"U.S. Gave Green Light for Iraq to Invade Kuwait"... sure... and don't forget how the Jews use the blood of little Arab children to make matzo for Passover...
16 posted on 03/21/2004 7:29:48 AM PST by thoughtomator (Voting Bush because there is no reasonable alternative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
And here is what really happened. Amb GLaspie did have a meeting with Saddam 8 days before the invasion. She never said any of the things mentioned in this transcript. She listened and that was about all. The released transcripts were a total fabrication by the Iraqis. She testified to this before the Senate. Terek Aziz later admitted she was telling the truth, that in fact all she did was listen. So, we are still debating Iraqi propoganda as truth.
17 posted on 03/21/2004 7:33:27 AM PST by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix; All
It doesn't hurt my feelings if the story is false. I would like to think that we aren't quite so incompetent that we would imply to a thug we approve of a "little" invasion, just not a "big" invasion.

However, what I know of the State Department leaves the door open for this kind of idiocy.

This is what FR does best, right? Thousands of smart people use their collective information to cull the truth from various shady sources.
18 posted on 03/21/2004 7:34:36 AM PST by Pan_Yan (I think the first Mars colony should have 535 members.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: prion
The Ambassador denied this occured. She may have indicated that the US took no official stand regarding any boundary dispute. That, of course, is not "giving a green light for war."

Frankly, I'd rather see it pulled. It was refuted long ago and I'm tired of having to reinvent the wheel each time some old story pops up. There's enough of this stuff on DU.
19 posted on 03/21/2004 7:35:13 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zook
No one is forcing you to read this tread or post to it. You made your opinion clear on post #3. I'll send a little extra in my monthy donation to pay for the band width that this thread is using up. I'm sorry it hurts you so much.
20 posted on 03/21/2004 7:38:27 AM PST by Pan_Yan (This rant provided as a public service.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson