Skip to comments.
Kerry Friend Beau Dietl 'Shocked' by Assassination Plot
NewsMax.com ^
| March 20, 2004
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 03/20/2004 8:47:40 PM PST by Carl/NewsMax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-125 next last
To: Howlin
"I can't wait to see how Douglas Brinkley explains not having THIS in his book either; what is this now, about five things he missed?"
For the record, Brinkley claims never to have heard about this discussion or the Phoenix Plan at all. He says he based his claim that Kerry wrote a letter of resignation on November 10, 1971 (two days before the KC meeting) on a footnote in Hunt's book, The Turning. I have Hunt's book. This is an absurd mistake. Hunt's footnote doesn't mention a day. It mentions a section of the archive--as 10.
Again, what a suspiciously convenient error.
101
posted on
03/20/2004 11:39:10 PM PST
by
Hon
To: Sabertooth
Good point!
102
posted on
03/20/2004 11:40:09 PM PST
by
Hon
To: Texasforever
![](http://members.shaw.ca/victoriausa/SaberCrouch.jpg)
Was anyone charged for the shooting?
I thought so, but what I posted at #92 is as much as I've been able to find tonight.
|
To: Texasforever
He had guilty knowledge of a conspiracy as far as I can see. Think about this: by his own admission (now that he's copping to the KC meeting) he's been in the presence of "officially sanctioned murderers (Vietnam) and conspiracy to murder members of the United States Congress -- and he NEVER advised anybody of either.
104
posted on
03/20/2004 11:44:06 PM PST
by
Howlin
(BTW. I'm glad you add the "-on" there.)
To: Howlin
Kerry is something we have never seen in presidential politics. Clinton was just a dirty joke, Kerry is truly dangerous to this nation.
105
posted on
03/20/2004 11:46:34 PM PST
by
Texasforever
(I am all flamed out.)
To: Texasforever
The Clintons were out for themselves; Kerry is out to destroy this country.
106
posted on
03/20/2004 11:50:00 PM PST
by
Howlin
(BTW. I'm glad you add the "-on" there.)
To: potlatch; MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; Happy2BMe; onyx
107
posted on
03/21/2004 1:51:44 AM PST
by
devolve
(................... ...........................Hello from Sunny South Florida!..........)
To: devolve
Well now, isn't that fun.
108
posted on
03/21/2004 1:53:00 AM PST
by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold.)
To: Sabertooth
Stennis was a Democrat, Saber...
To: Sabertooth
Oops, just read your next post...
To: Hon
"For the record, Brinkley claims never to have heard about this discussion or the Phoenix Plan at all. He says he based his claim that Kerry wrote a letter of resignation on November 10, 1971 (two days before the KC meeting) on a footnote in Hunt's book, The Turning. I have Hunt's book. This is an absurd mistake. Hunt's footnote doesn't mention a day. It mentions a section of the archive--as 10."
Brinkely's book was never about history, it was about making JFKerry a "hero" create a fantasy foundation from which JFKerry would run for president.
Brinkely has egg on his face, and probably knows it.
To: Rocky
What's amazing is that some of the people who have challenged Kerry's account of this event have prefaced their comments with things like, "I support John Kerry. He's a friend of mine." It's not the Bush team that's inflicting the damage. So why would Democrats be doing this unless a more powerful Democrat behind the scenes was pulling some strings? Someone with access to damaging information on a lot of people, including Kerry and his "friends".My thoughts exactly. Also add -- Why has this subject not been raised in the mainstream media? It sure as hell is a bigger story than GW possibly missing a couple of training days in the NG.....
To: Howlin
Howlin, I have a different view. I thinnk Kerry is dumb and craven and wants to be president because he just wants too,,he is the ultimate narcissist. He would sell his soul to the devil to be famous and to be in the Oval Office. I don't think he has any definite principles and is a tool for others. Clinton on the other hand was far more personally dangerous because his wife is an ideogogue. Kerry is just stupid if you ask me, weak, craves the spotlight, needs to feel better than others. He is an empty suit and will be used and used and used. In that way he is dangerous. But not enough of a person to hold any deeply felt convictions. He just poses!
113
posted on
03/21/2004 5:34:37 AM PST
by
cajungirl
(John Kerry has no botox and I have a bridge to sell you!)
To: potlatch
Thanks ! Jean Keri, Mr. French ...
114
posted on
03/21/2004 6:23:12 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(The Democrats say they believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
To: potlatch
The French Connection ...
115
posted on
03/21/2004 6:27:33 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(The Democrats say they believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
To: Carl/NewsMax
Well, even though Kerry's a liar, Dietl is DEAD WRONG on the law here. If we assume Kerry lied and was there, but voted against and spoke against the talk of assassination and quit the group, then he is NOT guilty of participating in any conspiracy.
Should he have reported the incident? Yes. Does that make him guilty? No.
116
posted on
03/21/2004 7:14:06 AM PST
by
WL-law
To: Gator113
Although, on it's face, this whole thing seems that it might have political legs, but in my State, it takes a bit more for one to satisfy the Criminal Conspiracy Statute. Two or more people need to communicate (plan) about the commission of a crime and then one or more needs to take a "substantial step" toward the commission of the conspired crime. For fun, lets say that Kerry was present during such a planing meeting and he failed to immediately report this to Law Enforcement..... and then ANY one of the subjects took ANY "substantial step in toward the commission of the crime", but was unable to complete the act....Kerry is still toast as he remains part of the original conspiracy.
Weakness of the argument here is that if you vote AGAINST the act, you are not "planning" it. That's overreaching and any such prosecution would clearly fail.
117
posted on
03/21/2004 7:20:59 AM PST
by
WL-law
To: ASA Vet
I disagree, the broom stick fits quite nicely.
118
posted on
03/21/2004 7:54:49 AM PST
by
hope
To: Sybeck1
Sybeck1,
If I am not mistaken Beau Dietl is a Bush supporter.
119
posted on
03/21/2004 11:49:54 AM PST
by
Shepster
(Hook 'em Horns!!!)
To: ntnychik
Ping to #39
120
posted on
03/21/2004 2:15:32 PM PST
by
potlatch
( Medals do not make a man. Morals do.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-125 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson