Skip to comments.
Democrat Vote Fraud: Never Forget
self
| 03-20-04
| wl-law
Posted on 03/20/2004 7:57:52 AM PST by WL-law
In an article posted earlier today, What Kerry Can Expect From His Party, authored by Joan Marie Nagy, she says:
The fact that no Democrat insider backed Gore is proof positive that they KNOW Gore lost the election. Even with illegal aliens and Democrat felons voting, Milwaukee derelicts bribed with cigarettes by New York limousine liberals, Philadelphia inner city precincts producing an unbelievable 100 percent turnout, a St. Louis Democrat judge keeping inner city districts open and voting until midnight, and the dead voting in almost every Democrat district--they still lost.
It is important for Freepers to know that she leaves out the best evidence of all of vote fraud in 2000, and we need to keep alive our knowledge of the following best and well-proven evidence of democrat theft here it is:
John Lott's study of the disqualified (double-punched) Florida ballots showed that, in inner-city districts, the republican ballots (there are between 5-10% registered repubs in the inner cities, i.e., black republicans) were fifty to sixty times more likely to be double-punched than were the democratic ballots!!
To put that in perspective, if you assume that 95% of black voters are democrats and 5% republicans, then for every democrat ballot that was double-voted, there were TWO republican ballots that were double-voted, even though the dems outnumbered repubs by a 19-to-1 ratio. This is the ultimate smoking gun of voter fraud, but the press has IGNORED his findings.
Lott's research USED, as its raw data, the information collected by none other than the "USA Today" consortium of press organizations. Yes, this is the very press group that investigated the Florida ballots in a failed attempt to 'prove' that Gore would have won if the votes were recounted -- and their OWN DATA reveals the fraud.
Lott's investigation ties the high repub invalidated ballots to voting precincts controlled by democrat voting officials. The clear inference is that the ballots are collected and segregated by-party, and that someone took the republican pile and spoiled the ballots by "double-voting" them, i.e., punching something through the pile.
The notion that black republicans are fifty times more incompetent at basic voting skills than democratic voters (even though mean incomes, education level, etc, are much higher) is too ludicrous to contemplate.
Remember this, and repeat it whenever dems reverse the facts and claim that the election was stolen from them.
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lott; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
1
posted on
03/20/2004 7:57:53 AM PST
by
WL-law
To: WL-law
The important question is: Who is going to do something about it this next time around? Are the Dems once again going to be permitted to commit widespread and rampant electoral fraud, or is someone in the GOP putting together a plan to stop it (or at a minimum slow it down)?
2
posted on
03/20/2004 7:59:47 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
("When I use a word," Humpty F. Kerry said, in rather a scornful tone...)
To: WL-law
T-Shirt or bumper sticker idea: DemocRats: The Fraudulent Party.
To: WL-law
This line is from another thread on FR:
Even with illegal aliens and Democrat felons voting, Milwaukee derelicts bribed with cigarettes by New York limousine liberals, Philadelphia inner city precincts producing an unbelievable 100 percent turnout, a St. Louis Democrat judge keeping inner city districts open and voting until midnight, and the dead voting in almost every Democrat district--they still lost.
4
posted on
03/20/2004 8:03:34 AM PST
by
SkyPilot
To: WL-law
Let's not forget that the most common cause for discarded ballots was the stacking of punch cards from Republican districts, and double stamping them, thereby disqualifying them. Democratic operatives were found and convicted of having punch machines in there possession.
To: thoughtomator
The answer is, "take the message to the streets, on your bumper sticker and t-shirt." Don't let the democRats promote the illusion that they are omnipresent and in total control. They aren't. Their success requires people to believe that there is no alternative to being a democRat. It's our job to prove otherwise.
During the last election it was dicey to have a Bush bumper sticker in the Bay Area. One could get dangerously tailgated by the "nicest-looking people" around Stanford, or by not-so-nice-looking people in new-model trade-union-style pick-up trucks.
Our side has played "nice guy" too long. This is a war for our country, and our side must WIN.
NEVER take the Bush sticker off the car.
To: WL-law
"Philadelphia inner city precincts producing an unbelievable 100 percent turnout ..."
Not to mention the 105% turnout on the South Dakota Indian reservations, which resulted in two Indian women being arrested for filling out scores of absentee ballots using the names of dead people. Oh, didn't hear about that??
7
posted on
03/20/2004 8:11:02 AM PST
by
MNnice
To: Tax Government
Getting the message out and being an out-and-proud Republican is all well and good, but what I'm concerned about is the actual manipulation of the votes themselves. Bumper stickers aren't going to stop Philadelphia districts from reporting a 102% turnout... it's not going to stop the registration of dead people.
8
posted on
03/20/2004 8:11:31 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Voting Bush because there is no reasonable alternative...)
To: WL-law
In Chicago, the democrats have been performing miracles, for years. They can even raise the dead. You don't believe me? Just go review the election records. There were many dead people, who were so strongly in favor of democrat candidates, that they climbed out of their graves and went to the polling places to vote for democrat candidates.
end sarcasm.
One of the strongest arguments for election fraud on the part of the 'Spotted Al' Gore presidential campaign is the 'Goron[' chose William Daley as his campaign manager. Remember that William Daley hails from the Chicago Daley's, one of the nations most corrupt political machines, ranking with the Tammany Hall democrat machine of New York State.
9
posted on
03/20/2004 8:17:03 AM PST
by
punster
(q)
To: thoughtomator
The problem is rapidly compounding with the spread of the paperless computer voting machines. There is no way to know with these whether a vote is recorded properly or counted properly. The effective franchise is drastically reduced to software techs and hackers.
10
posted on
03/20/2004 8:21:35 AM PST
by
arthurus
(fighting them OVER THERE is better than fighting them OVER HERE)
To: WL-law
But all these stats are too complicated for the liberals to hear and understand. Joan's best line and one that even the liberals can understand is, if Gore won, why didn't the Democrats back him again this time? If Gore really did win in 2000, shouldn't Democrats welcome the oppotunity to prove their claim? Yet, nobody backed Gore. He wanted to run and nobody wanted him. Why? They know he didn't win.
11
posted on
03/20/2004 8:22:01 AM PST
by
WVNan
To: thoughtomator
or is someone in the GOP putting together a plan to stop it (or at a minimum slow it down)? In many of those areas it is dangerous for a white Republican to even walk down the street, let alone go into the polling places and demand to see if the results have been tampered with. I doubt there is much that can be done in black areas, where they have had the power to steal votes at will, and get away with it.
Remember, Nixon beat Kennedy. We're still are waiting for the punishment of those who perpetrated that vote fraud.
12
posted on
03/20/2004 8:22:17 AM PST
by
swampfox98
(Beyond 2004 - Chaos! 200 million illegals waiting in the wings)
To: WL-law
I never thaough i would say it but i believe blacks were disenfranchized in Michigan this caucus season. This was done by last minute polling place moves, polls that never opened and improper ballots.
Seems that someone was doing their best to make sure that Al Sharpton didnt take too many votes from the prefered winner.
13
posted on
03/20/2004 8:24:36 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
To: swampfox98
Yes, and the Republicans ran him again to prove the point. Why did'nt the dims run Gore again?
14
posted on
03/20/2004 8:24:49 AM PST
by
WVNan
To: WL-law
"Lott's investigation ties the high repub invalidated ballots to voting precincts controlled by democrat voting officials. The clear inference is that the ballots are collected and segregated by-party, and that someone took the republican pile and spoiled the ballots by "double-voting" them, i.e., punching something through the pile. "
You do not have to do any segregation by party. If you are a crat operative, you just take all the ballots and make sure the crat spot is punched. Then, if there is a Republican vote, the ballot will be spoiled because there would be votes for two candidates. If it was a Democrat vote, anyway, it will be valid, and you will have simply helped push those pesky chads through.
I have heard that a long thin rod can be put through an entire stack, and I would imagine that this is may well be why they stuck with these kinds of ballots in certain Democrat strongholds.
15
posted on
03/20/2004 8:25:49 AM PST
by
Montfort
To: WL-law
The clear inference is that the ballots are collected and segregated by-party, and that someone took the republican pile and spoiled the ballots by "double-voting" them, i.e., punching something through the pile. They don't even have to segregate by-party since all they have to do is re-punch all ballots collected as <"For Gore">. The "For Bush" ballots would become "double voted" and discarded and the "For Gore" ballots would pass through clean and BE COUNTED.
16
posted on
03/20/2004 8:27:26 AM PST
by
NJJ
To: Montfort
Congratulations, your faster.
Norm
17
posted on
03/20/2004 8:29:38 AM PST
by
NJJ
To: WL-law
Don't forget the RATS having most of the Absentee ballotos thrown out. Then having the nerve to say: WE WANT EVERY VOTE COUNTED: (Most Absentee ballots were none other than our brave men & women of our MILITARY)!!!!! They had 8 years of having a draft dodger as their boss and wanted a change more than anyone.
To: WL-law
There is no reason to believe that voter fraud will not be significantly WORSE in the 2004 election.
As already noted, paperless voting is extremely dangerous. No wonder the Democrats support it. All it takes is the push of one button, and thousands of votes can be switched from one candidate to another. No need to lose or spoil ballots.
Also, the Republicans have done essentially NOTHING to punish the guilty. The voter fraud in South Dakota was notorious, but John Thune refused to do anything about it. That pattern has been repeated again and again. Democrats steal an election, and no one is punished. Why should they hesitate to commit a crime when they know they will not be punished even if they are caught?
Republicans keep saying, let by-gones be by-gones. Let's just move on. Exactly--let's move on to even greater fraud and corruption that inevitably is encouraged by such spineless behavior.
19
posted on
03/20/2004 8:29:52 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: WVNan
Why did'nt the dims run Gore again?They knew he lost the election, and besides they couldn't even stand him themselves.
20
posted on
03/20/2004 8:30:44 AM PST
by
swampfox98
(Beyond 2004 - Chaos! 200 million illegals waiting in the wings)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson