Armin certainly didn't hurt his victim. The guy was unconscious (intentional cough syrup overdose) and was stabbed right in the ol' ticker.
So hey, consenting adults, who cares, right?
To: agenda_express; BA63; banjo joe; Believer 1; billbears; Blood of Tyrants; ChewedGum; ...
BreakPoint/Chuck Colson Ping! If anyone wants on or off my BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
2 posted on
03/19/2004 10:13:01 AM PST by
Mr. Silverback
(Your ultraconservativen click-gorilla.)
To: Mr. Silverback
Isn't cannibalism something like slavery, where the consenting adult paradigm should not hold?
To: Mr. Silverback
their slightly odd relationship? Um, slightly odd? I'd go a little further than that, dude.
4 posted on
03/19/2004 10:19:52 AM PST by
mitchbert
(Facts are Stubborn Things)
To: Mr. Silverback
When you go down the slippery slope of "assisted suicide", this is what you get.
6 posted on
03/19/2004 10:29:22 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn?t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Mr. Silverback
"So hey, consenting adults, who cares, right?"
Who said Brandes consented to be eaten? The cannibal?
Unless Armin has video tape showing Brandes stating his wish to be eaten and a couple of psychiatrists who had examined Brandes and found him to be of sound mind, what Armin says Brandes wanted shouldn't matter.
If he is believed, then every murderer could claim his victim wanted to be killed.
7 posted on
03/19/2004 11:25:11 AM PST by
monday
To: Mr. Silverback
This method sounds fictitious to me. If the guy was really into pain, wouldn't he have wanted to experience the ecstasy of at least watching a few choice morsels carved off and served with a properly decanted vintage red wine?
How do we know that wasn't the case--and that at some point he might have said, "Gott in himmel, I've made a mistake. No more for me, thanks."
We're supposed to rely on the cannibal's word?
I've never understood it before, but perhaps suicide does indicate extreme mental illness and that's what elevates the injury of oneself to a crime.
8 posted on
03/19/2004 11:49:50 AM PST by
wildbill
To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping + Where eliminating moral absolutes will take us.
(Actually it will take us evern further into the abyss.)
let me know if you want on/off this pinglist.
14 posted on
03/19/2004 7:29:31 PM PST by
little jeremiah
(...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
To: Mr. Silverback
The idea today is that were autonomouswere free to do whatever we want, as long as we dont hurt somebody else.This concept is espoused by our libertarian friends; sooner or later, life offers up a situation that will put such a doctrine to the test.
To: Mr. Silverback
There are no formulas that will enable us to abandon moral judgement in certain areas..........not everything can be boiled down to a legalistic idea.
To: Mr. Silverback
I'll have the Chili con Hombre and the Lady Fingers, please.
17 posted on
03/20/2004 10:41:11 AM PST by
boris
(The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson