This isn't lucid. I mean, even more than your normal stuff. Mhat are you trying to say?
What you're doing now is making things up that I didn't say.
I refer you to post 929, where you said:
Remember "Vicar of Christ". That title came from the Roman Emperors.
That's exactly what you said. That "Vicar of Christ" was a title of the Emperors.
Care to address the actual history which you know well at this point - or just care to snipe like your pal Cronos there.
Why don't you try being lucid for a minute, slowly explain what you are trying to say in normal English, and then I'll show you where you are mistaken.
"Vicar of Christ" was never a title of the Emperors.
SD
Dave, I'm done with it. If you wish to put words in my mouth that I didn't say instead of dealing with the history, have at it. It is dishonest and peripheral and I'm not going to sit and pick knits with you instead of dealing with the central arguements. This has nothing to do with the central arguments and is a generalization - perhaps overgeneralization that is being sniped at for that very purpose, to distract. Which is why snipes are brought in in the first place - to ask a gazillion general questions, flood the thread with non answers and destroy the cohesion of the debate.
The title, Dave, Came from a title used of the Emperors. That is the point I was making and it isn't worth it. I'm done with it. This sort of overgeneralized answer you're picking at is nothing more than the product of answering a snipe. have fun with it.