To: ET(end tyranny)
Why doesn't the Statue of Liberty embrace a child, rather than a tablet?
Simple, it is not meant to be a portrayal of Mary. Nor is the statue you portrayed in your post. It's not Mary, and it is not worshipped. If it were a statue of Mary, it still would not be worshipped, except in your diseased analysis.
1,148 posted on
03/22/2004 11:03:56 PM PST by
Petronski
(Kerry knew...and did nothing. THAT....is weakness.)
To: Petronski
I didn't say it was Mary, just that I found it interesting that a statue gracing a pope's tomb would show a woman embracing the SUN. I think I even mentioned in my first post that the statue was called 'Verita', NOT Mary...
'Flail away'.
Hey, did you know that Pope Gregory XIII had a dragon on his coat of arms? And it was Gregory that wanted the calendar changed. Just like the prophecy of Daniel talks about, regarding the beast. And pope Gregory's tomb has a dragon in front of it to protect it! Over the doorways in the Hall of Maps in the Vatican is Pope Gregory's dragons.... (see above)
1,162 posted on
03/22/2004 11:15:01 PM PST by
ET(end tyranny)
(Isaiah 47:4 - Our Redeemer, YHWH of hosts is His name, The Holy One of Israel.)
To: Petronski; ET(end tyranny)
Why doesn't the Statue of Liberty embrace a child, rather than a tablet?
huh???? Dazed are the followers of the Great Hvoc and his profit Reg (pbuh), they all are doped on Hashish it seems -- Hashashins. The Statue of liberty was never meant to be a depiction of Mary with The Child Jesus. Which world are you guys from? Saudi A?
1,202 posted on
03/23/2004 2:01:47 AM PST by
Cronos
(W2K4!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson