But you misinterpret scripture so badly, then you insist that your abortively-bad misinterpretation is "what scripture says."
...And when we point out that Jesus notes it was a vision, oh boy....
And yet you keep repeating your errors over and over. The only thing left for the reader to do is consider whether your errors represent profound ignorance or the shabby lies of a hate-filled heart.
Wrong answer. Interpretation is a cute buzzword you guys like to throw around as an excuse to hide. I'm shocked it took this long to come out. People are not stupid as incredible as that might seem to you.
And yet you keep repeating your errors over and over. The only thing left for the reader to do is consider whether your errors represent profound ignorance or the shabby lies of a hate-filled heart.
Errors? No. Obstacles to you maybe; but, not errors. As I noted, It does indeed state that Christ said it was a vision. I quote again for the nth time:
Matthew 17:9 And as they came down from the mountain, Jesus charged them, saying, Tell the vision to no man, until the Son of man be risen again from the dead.
16:9 And a vision appeared to Paul in the night; There stood * a man of Macedonia, and prayed him *, saying, Come over into Macedonia, and help us.
Same word used both places. If you're saying it's a matter of translation, then you have to argue with the scholars. I doubt very much you want to do that. The term Vision has a very specific meaning in the context of scripture and This one is used exactly twice in the NT and you're looking at the two times it's used. Interpretation, huh? LOL. Care to try again. Or is scripture a lie of a hate-filled heart. You're so overblown with hatred that you cannot see how anyone can correct you without hating you.
Revelation 3:19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.
I suppose Jesus hated you for stating you were a sinner from the get go.