Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gibson's passion film 'too Catholic'
Belfast Telegraph ^ | 19 March 2004 | Alf McCreary

Posted on 03/19/2004 9:59:58 AM PST by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,381-1,389 next last
Comment #321 Removed by Moderator

To: Salve Regina
'A very old priest once scolded me, "How dare you not pray for your ancestors who prayed for you, and those decendents to come, who will surely pray for you?"'

Indeed! (Where is that priest, and why aren't there more like him?)

P.S. I appreciate your sharp intellect and sharp wit on this thread. Esp. re: The Acts of the Apostles . . . ;)
322 posted on 03/19/2004 5:35:09 PM PST by AMDG&BVMH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

Comment #323 Removed by Moderator

To: nickcarraway
You say that Mary is not dead because she has spiritual life. The form of death being referred to by the other party is physical death. They are not one in the same.
Spiritual life confers nothing on Mary or any other human saved by Christ that allows them to forgo God's given boundaries. The Bodily dead are not deity, nor are they allowed to interfere with the goings on of the bodily living per Ecclessiastes 9 and a host of other OT scripture which forbade communicating with the physically dead under any form. That is the deciet. You attempt to confuse the two and in that deciet pretend as though it somehow nullifies God's statutes.
324 posted on 03/19/2004 5:36:11 PM PST by Havoc ("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
You say that Mary is not dead because she has spiritual life. The form of death being referred to by the other party is physical death. They are not one in the same.
Spiritual life confers nothing on Mary or any other human saved by Christ that allows them to forgo God's given boundaries. The Bodily dead are not deity, nor are they allowed to interfere with the goings on of the bodily living per Ecclessiastes 9 and a host of other OT scripture which forbade communicating with the physically dead under any form. That is the deciet. You attempt to confuse the two and in that deciet pretend as though it somehow nullifies God's statutes.
325 posted on 03/19/2004 5:36:18 PM PST by Havoc ("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

Comment #326 Removed by Moderator

To: nickcarraway; TRY ONE
In Matthew 17, do Elijah and Moses not appear to Jesus, Peter, James, and John?

In fact they do appear - in a vision, not bodily. Matthew 17:9 And as they came down from the mountain, Jesus charged them, saying, Tell the vision to no man, until the Son of man be risen again from the dead.

327 posted on 03/19/2004 5:40:04 PM PST by Havoc ("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE
Why pray to another spiritual being? Show me one example in Scripture where an Apostle or Prophet did so!

The Apostle John's vision of the Apocalypse:

5:8 And when he had opened the book, the four living creatures and the four and twenty ancients fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.

8:3 And another angel came and stood before the altar, having a golden censer: and there was given to him much incense, that he should offer of the prayers of all saints, upon the golden altar which is before the throne of God. 4 And the smoke of the incense of the prayers of the saints ascended up before God from the hand of the angel.

328 posted on 03/19/2004 5:42:48 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

Comment #329 Removed by Moderator

To: TRY ONE; Havoc; Salve Regina
Why does Paul say in 2 Thessalonians 1:11 that is he is praying for people? Was that wrong of him?

More importantly why did Paul ask others to pray for him? (Rom. 15:30–32, Eph. 6:18–20, Col. 4:3, 1 Thess. 5:25, 2 Thess. 3:1) Why would Paul ask others to pray for him? Paul clearly believes it is not a sin to pray for others, or to ask for other to pray for you. Why would it be wrong to ask anyone connected to you in the Body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12: esp.27;Ephesians 4:esp.12) to pray for you?

Paul had better not thing praying for other is a sin. Jesus Himself commanded it: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;(Matthew 5:44)

330 posted on 03/19/2004 5:46:01 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"I can almost guarantee that it is a minor point that non-Catholics have attributed undeserved significance to."

A great response which is all "too true."

You are an excellent and articulate witness to the Catholic faith! All of your replies really hit the nail on the head! Bravo and thank you.

331 posted on 03/19/2004 5:46:11 PM PST by TOUGH STOUGH (The first amendment was NOT intended for the protection of profane speech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah; TRY ONE
You're quoting from a book of prophecy wherein what the writer is seeing is symbolic. Or do you think that the woman on the beast later in the book is literal.. Furthermore, it doesn't show the angel or the ancients being prayed to. Strike one, and two. next.
332 posted on 03/19/2004 5:46:19 PM PST by Havoc ("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I didn't think the film was "too Catholic" in its emphasis on Mary the Mother of Jesus. The film never made her appear as a goddess figure, just as a concerned and heartbroken mother. I thought Maya Morgenstern's portrayal was beautiful and should be worthy of an Oscar nomination, if Hollywood was in the mood to reward a religious film (which it isn't).
333 posted on 03/19/2004 5:46:19 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
You are the one who is adding terms to the Bible; I just quoted the Bible. If you don't think the Bible is properly written, take it up with the authors or write your own.
334 posted on 03/19/2004 5:47:53 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: Salve Regina
Sorry, you can play word games all you wish. God Corrected Peter and told them to listen to Jesus. Jesus flatly stated then that it was a vision, not a visitation. Wiggle and squirm. It is written.
335 posted on 03/19/2004 5:48:12 PM PST by Havoc ("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Furthermore, it doesn't show the angel or the ancients being prayed to.

Read it again. The elders and angels are offering the prayers which they have received to God.

336 posted on 03/19/2004 5:48:40 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
So you believe they were sinning against Deuteronomy 18:10–11? No, Deuteronomy 18:10–11 is against necromancy. Jesus was not practicing necromancy, and neither are we if we ask saints to pray to God for us. How do you explain Revelation 5:8?
337 posted on 03/19/2004 5:50:22 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.(Revelations 5:8)"

"Saints" in this case are all BELIEVERS.
Romans 1:7 --- "to ALL who are beloved of God in Rome, called as saints".

"Saints" mean "holy ones" or "set-apart ones". The New Testament designates all believers as "saints" because they are by position holy and set apart to God (Phil. 4:21; Col. 1:2)
338 posted on 03/19/2004 5:52:08 PM PST by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

Comment #339 Removed by Moderator

To: Havoc
You say that Mary is not dead because she has spiritual life. The form of death being referred to by the other party is physical death. They are not one in the same.

I agree, she is physically dead, but is still alive. Just because she is no longer alive on this earth, does not mean she isn't still worshiping God. She is among the saints whose prayers are mentioned in Revelation 5:8.

340 posted on 03/19/2004 5:53:11 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,381-1,389 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson