To: Indy Pendance
bump for later
2 posted on
03/18/2004 7:13:24 PM PST by
I'm ALL Right!
(MY candidate knows what he believes in.)
To: JohnHuang2; LadyX; MEG33; MeekOneGOP; dutchess
Bingo!
3 posted on
03/18/2004 7:21:41 PM PST by
Aquamarine
(Judge Roy Moore is not Congress and he was not making a law.)
To: Indy Pendance
Well, "everybody knows" that Wahhabism and Ba'athist socialism are diametric opposites, and can never be reconciled.
After all, wasn't Saddam regularly murdering the Shi'ite Muslims and extending additional considerations for the Sunni Muslims? He murdered some of them too, but not as many.
Keep in mind that Saddam had no compunctions whatsoever in having two of his sons-in-law summarily executed, and he probably ordered the watcher squad assault on Uday when the boy was running a little wild a few years back here. Just as a matter of discipline, you know.
Saddam was just a bad seed. But then, Osama bin Laden isn't so very much better.
To: Indy Pendance
I read this before, but it was better the second time. Excellent analysis. Thanks for posting it.
5 posted on
03/18/2004 7:29:19 PM PST by
jwalburg
(Terrorists just need more counseling)
To: Indy Pendance
It is no secret I am not a fan of this kiddo, but this has to be the most poorly constructed excuse for analysis that I have
ever seen him write.
That said, I'm not in a good mood, so I'll mark it for a revisit, because at this point I haven't a clue how to draw the zigs on the zags on the rags...
6 posted on
03/18/2004 7:32:40 PM PST by
harrowup
(So perfect, just naturally humble.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson