Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun sale shifts city policy
The Wichita Eagle ^ | Mar. 18, 2004 | HURST LAVIANA

Posted on 03/18/2004 4:25:30 PM PST by neverdem

For years, firearms seized in Wichita Municipal Court cases were destroyed. Now, the city's planning to sell them.

The Wichita City Council's decision this week to allow the sale of weapons confiscated in Wichita Municipal Court cases reversed a long-standing policy that was designed to keep guns off city streets.

Supporters of the change said Tuesday that the council's action offers a logical way to raise thousands of dollars during tight budget times. Opponents said the move sets a dangerous precedent.

"I don't think the city should be in the business of getting guns back out on the street," said City Council member Sharon Fearey, who voted against the move. "It's just been a long-standing policy of the city that we destroy those weapons."

Council member Paul Gray suggested the move after reviewing a list of weapons that were scheduled to be destroyed this spring. After reading the list, he said, he was left with one thought: "There's too much value in that list of firearms to melt them down."

The list included 159 handguns and 88 shotguns and rifles.

Instead of destroying the guns, the council asked the city's legal department to draft an amendment to a city ordinance that would allow the city to sell some of its guns to licensed firearms dealers.

Police said the action would apply only to cases that went through Municipal Court. Guns seized in state court cases would continue to be destroyed.

Police spokeswoman Janet Johnson said police seize or confiscate 600 to 1,000 guns in a typical year. She said the department doesn't track the number that come from Municipal Court cases.

Gray said waiting lists and other restrictions placed on gun dealers since the early 1990s have made it unlikely that a criminal will be able to buy one of the city's guns.

Police Chief Norman Williams said he will remain neutral on the issue while the department researches the question. He said he planned to have a report on the issue in early April, when the council is scheduled to take another look at it.

"One of the things you always have concerns with is, what is the likelihood that they're going to wind up back on your streets and used in other crimes," he said. "That is the major concern we have."

Williams said the department once traded confiscated weapons for service weapons used by officers. He said that practice was stopped after some of the guns started turning up on the streets. He said he did not recall a specific crime where a criminal used one of those guns.

Nationwide, Williams said, police departments became leery in the early 1990s of selling confiscated weapons after some guns in one or two large cities were used in serious crimes.

Sedgwick County Sheriff Gary Steed said his office routinely destroys guns that have been confiscated or seized by deputies. He said investigators try to find the owners of guns that have been stolen.

Fraternal Order of Police vice president Chester Pinkston said the police union has not taken an official position on the issue, but he said he was not opposed.

"Personally, I think that the city is looking in the right direction," he said. "Personally I have no problem with law-abiding citizens having guns."

Kansas state Sen. Phil Journey, a longtime gun rights advocate who is embroiled in a legislative debate over carrying concealed firearms, said the council's actions were logical. He said he has looked at lists of guns about to be destroyed and seen some expensive ones.

"I've seen firearms that were destroyed that were worth over $1,000 easily," he said.

"If there's 1,000 firearms that sell for $100 apiece, that's $100,000," he said. "If there's 2,000 firearms that sell for $150 apiece, that's $300,000. Maybe it's only $150,000 a year, but heck, that's two cops."

In Mesa, Ariz., last year, city officials surveyed the nation's 50 largest cities and found that only Chicago and Houston were selling confiscated guns. The Mesa City Council later approved the sale of that city's weapons.

John Daily, who manages the Bullet Stop at 2625 W. Pawnee, said he thinks local gun dealers would be interested in buying some of the department's confiscated weapons.

"Absolutely -- depending on the type of gun that it is," he said. "We would be interested in any type of firearms that are used in hunting, and other types of sporting guns. We're not interested in Saturday night specials."

Deputy Sedgwick County Attorney Ann Swegle said a state law would prevent the city from selling one group of guns -- those that have been used in crimes. The law says if such weapons cannot be returned to a rightful owner, they must be destroyed or forfeited to the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, she said.

"I don't know that the city has the ability to make that decision (to sell those weapons)," she said.

Reach Hurst Laviana at 268-6499 or hlaviana@wichitaeagle.com.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Kansas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; gunavailability; municipalfinances

1 posted on 03/18/2004 4:25:31 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d; Travis McGee; Joe Brower
BANG
2 posted on 03/18/2004 4:30:16 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Money, money changes everything.

3 posted on 03/18/2004 4:36:12 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The "let's not put these guns back on the streets" is so specious that it is sickening unless the aim of the police department is to sell guns only to drug dealers and robbers and murders.
4 posted on 03/18/2004 4:41:03 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
Bang
5 posted on 03/18/2004 4:45:28 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Wow, a bit of rational logic creeps into government thinking!
6 posted on 03/18/2004 5:46:12 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Smith & Wesson Gun-Cam™

Smith & Wesson Cam Loading-

 Gun Cam is Active

7 posted on 03/18/2004 6:29:38 PM PST by TERMINATTOR (Sic semper tyrannis! (Thus always to tyrants!) -John Wilkes Booth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TERMINATTOR
A deep blued beauty.
8 posted on 03/18/2004 7:59:27 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I have a simple solution to this problem that should make everyone happy.

Give the Guns to Albert Wang, and Albert Wang will never sell them to crack heads that live in Wichita.

I wonder how many of these guns that are "destoyed" end up in some cop's collection.
9 posted on 03/18/2004 8:21:30 PM PST by AlbertWang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlbertWang
I wonder how many of these guns that are "destoyed" end up in some cop's collection.

I would like to see a policy that any time a firearm is destroyed, the portion of the frame containing the serial number must be retained. Otherwise, as noted, many such firearms are apt to escape, though just as likely into the hands of criminals as into a cop's collection.

Though I should be clear that the policies requiring destruction are wrongheaded to begin with.

BTW, in many areas, cops deliberately avoid running traces on firearms recovered from criminals; I suspect highly that this is because if the guns were stolen (usual scenario) such traces would identify the rightful owners and the cops would have to comply with the laws requiring that all stolen property be returned to its owner when no longer needed for evidentiary purposes.

10 posted on 03/18/2004 9:21:14 PM PST by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I did a little nosing around. It seems the Wichita police have had two questionable shootings by their officers in the past month.

Looks like the chief wants to build up the funds available for defending lawsuits or buying off the victims' families.<p. -archy-/-

11 posted on 03/18/2004 9:54:14 PM PST by archy (Concrete shoes, cyanide, TNT! Done dirt cheap! Neckties, contracts, high voltage...Done dirt cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson