Incoming pro-gay troll alert!

self | march 17 2004 | little jeremiah

[tdadams]

They kept wanting me to post counter studies to disprove their subjective non-scientific stuff.

You mean like, "You haven't produced one article or piece of research disproving any point any of us has made", from post #217. I know, zzzzzz.

[tdadams]

You... attack everyone who points out the evil in the "gay" agenda.

Again, show me where I've ever "attacked" anyone. What is your definition of "attack"? Apparently simply disagreeing with you is an "attack" to you. That's an eerily fascist trait.

All you can do is call us names

Show me where, LJ. Show me one instance where I've called anyone on this board names. Pony up and prove your accusations. Good luck.

[subterfuge]

Homo's put their private parts into each others' fecal-matter and then put the privates in each others' mouths. Graphic enough for you?

[little jeremiah]

Well, you just said that I vilify and denigrate homosexuals. Explain how I do that.

And your statement here:

"in America, a free country, even homosexuals have the right to live the life they choose and you always jump to the hyperbole, saying we'll have to legalize bestiality, cannibalism, necrophilia, pedophilia, bigamy, etc. "

Why do you think homosexuals have the right to live the life they choose? I disagree, and for this, you trot out words like "vilify" and "denigrate".

Up until one generation or less ago, every state had laws on the books against sodomy and/or homosexual behavior specifically. For over 150 years no one (except maybe homosexuals) thought such laws unfair, wrong, or denying anyone their due rights.

I posit that this should be the status quo. Not to make it so "sex police" go into peoples' homes (they didn't even when such laws were in effect) but to prevent the public display of such acts, the seduction of youth, or the promotion of such deviancy as normal.

And as far as scripter's database, all you and your ilk can say is "bad man, bad man" and "bad research, bad research" like some kind of magic spell which will render such articles worthless by your continual repetition.

[whattajoke]

Homo's put their private parts into each others' fecal-matter and then put the privates in each others' mouths.

But 2 chicks... that's hot.

/Devils advocate mode

[ArGee]

I try to point out that in America, a free country, even homosexuals have the right to live the life they choose and you always jump to the hyperbole, saying we'll have to legalize bestiality, cannibalism, necrophilia, pedophilia, bigamy, etc.

The slippery slope isn't hyperbole, it's real and true. Just like it's real an true that if you don't limit government it will turn into a totalitarian dictatorship. Anyone who brings up the dangerous ends is not invoking hyperbole, just reminding us of the difficulty human beings have in achieving balance.

When the "free love" movement came out, people warned that this would lead to the acceptance of homosexuality. They were accused, as you just accused LJ, of using hyperbole to get involved with other people's business. They turned out to be right. (In those days nobody said, "So, what's your point?")

Now the train is rolling and it is hard to stop. Maybe we can stop the train at homosexuality. Maybe we can say that in these matters, but in no others, our sexual desires trump reason. But I don't see any historical reason to think so.

And the fact that "psychologists" are now starting to say that sexual activity might not be harmful, and might even be helpful, to children suggests that LJ and I are more likely to be right.

I could remind you that homosexuality is a mental illness. But that wouldn't be quite accurate any more. Homosexuality is an extreme expression of the notion that men, like dogs, are driven by their sexual urges rather than controlling them.

I don't support that notion.

Shalom.

[subterfuge]

"But 2 chicks... that's hot."

You got me there whattajoke! I dig your nic.

[little jeremiah]

Just in peoples' over-active imaginations.

Check out the streets of Berkelely CA or Eugene OR and take a look at actual lesbians. Plus, the idea of "getting off" while looking at two homosexuals performing their acts is rather degrading to everyone concerned. I know it's fashionable right now to think it's a turn on, but there's plenty of things people can accustom themselves to that are, objectively speaking, degrading.

[subterfuge]

You're right of course, in all seriousness. However, homosexual men are known to be more, how shall I say, course, in their actions. Guys are just more naturally nasty than women in general and put that together with their sexually perverted brains and its just ugly.

I'm reminded of the "pumping parties" that the homosexual/transgendered people have where they pump each other full of silicone in various places. You don't hear of homosexual women doing that kind of stuff. JMO.

[little jeremiah]

A number of years ago I lived in SF (was in the SF and south of for about 3 years, also lived there many years ago). You wouldn't believe the things I saw, and I went out of my want NOT to see things. For instance, at the "health food store" bulletin board - I remember a xeroxed ad for a "sex toy" party for just women - "bring your own chains and lubricant".

In SF you see many people who you have no idea whether they are male or female. I guess they don't know either. There are many sick freaks there.

I recognize what you're saying - but the whole feminist movement (which was originally based on homosexuality and hatred for men) has been busily destroying the natural feminine character of women for a couple of generations. So women - who have, generally speaking, natural female/feminine qualities - are being trained and indoctrinated to be "hard asses".

Feminism is anti-feminine. Its purpose is to destroy the natural female and natural male character, and the family. It is an arm of socialism and atheism, and totally destructive.

[subterfuge]

Good post lj. I have an uncle who is in his mid sixties who has lived with his "mate" for probably 25-30 years. Very committed, right?

Well a couple of years ago he was down from Canada and explained how he and "Aunt Brian" (thats what I call him) each had a "new friend" living with them (a foursome!), but they still cared deeply for each other. There are pictures of them wearing T-shirts with their ADDRESS printed on the shirt!

My uncle recently retired as the Dean of a major university in Toronto. He still consults for them though and has never left the academic world his entire life.