1 posted on
03/16/2004 12:00:27 PM PST by
presidio9
To: presidio9
but I'm also skeptical of sending people to Mars in the near term, as the Bush administration has proposed. Can someone point me to where the Bush proposal included sending people to Mars in the "near term"? Return to the Moon near-term (10 years) but a to my knowledge, no timetable was established (near or far term) for a journey to Mars.
2 posted on
03/16/2004 12:07:40 PM PST by
Ditto
( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
To: presidio9
Well, some folks don't even class Pluto as a real planet. Perhaps there are no planets beyond Uranus. [couldn't resist]
3 posted on
03/16/2004 12:07:44 PM PST by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: presidio9
>>the irregular behavior of Uranus<<
Did he have to word it that way?
>>the most unfortunately named object in our solar system. <<
"There once was a boy named Eustace Scrubb, and he almost deserved it." -- C.S. Lewis, the opening sentence of "the Voyage of the Dawn-Treader."
4 posted on
03/16/2004 12:11:05 PM PST by
dangus
To: presidio9
Quick, someone send a memo to Shelia Jackson Lee that they've found a planet was responsible for the "
irregular behavior of Uranus"
Won't she be surprised!
7 posted on
03/16/2004 12:13:31 PM PST by
Dead Dog
To: presidio9
I don't understand why they're abandoning the Hubble telescope either.
8 posted on
03/16/2004 12:16:54 PM PST by
stevio
(The early bird gets the worm, but the 2nd mouse gets the cheese.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson