Scotland Yard: terror attack in London inevitable

Jerusalem Post ^ | Mar. 16, 2004 | Douglas Davis

[Alouette]

FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel ping list.

WARNING: This is a high volume ping list

[Puppage]

Scotland Yard: terror attack in London inevitable

Well, then....ya might as well give up, submit to their will.

Don't worry AMERICA WILL PROTECT YOU.....AGAIN

[dfwgator]

The only question is will it be Al-Qaeda or the IRA?

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Sweeping out the radical mosques would be a good place to start protecting London.

[JCB]

I only hope that if/when such an attack occurs that the militant clerics in England and their followers are swiftly put to the sword - by vigilante mobs if necessary. Their hatred has been tolerated for far too long.

[presidio9]

Speaking at a press conference with London Mayor Ken Livingstone

Isn't this the clown who called President Bush "The most dangerous person in the history of the world?"

[eyespysomething]

Well, we all know the US was never attacked until we went into Iraq a year ago, neither was anyone else. If only we hadn't gone into Iraq, September 11 would have never happened. Nor the Bali bombing, nor all the other terrorist attacks.

See, it all involves this time machine, which let the terrorists know about us attacking Iraq way back in the 50's. Yep, that's it.

So no terror anywhere would have ever happened if only we hadn't attacked Iraq a year ago.

[Diogenesis]

John Kerry(D) and Martin McGuinness (IRA, Sinn Fein)
in Boston on March 12, 2004.

'You've got to win this. You've got to beat this guy. We need a new policy'

[RussianDude]

the Europeans are showing a propensity for their old game of appeasement, a game they have played with great vigor in the Israeli-Arab theater.

Do these fools really think that if Israel is destroyed they'll be spared?

[txhurl]

I hope Europe appreciates what terrorism does to their tourism industry.

[tjwmason]

----Scotland Yard: terror attack in London inevitable

Well, then....ya might as well give up, submit to their will.

Don't worry AMERICA WILL PROTECT YOU.....AGAIN----

I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say here. But just because we realise that we are a prime target for al Qa'eda does not mean that we will surrender, it does not mean that we will do anything other than continue to fight.

Also, in terms of terrorism, we do not need help from America (though our partnership is greatly valued by all sane leaders over here), after all we stood firm against 25 years of the (American financed) I.R.A.

England does not surrender.

[retrokitten]

I agree with you. I believe Donald Rumsfeld and John Ashcroft have said they think it's only a matter of time before America is attacked by Al Qaeda again, so I don't really see this as some huge revelation.

England is not a wimpy nation that will roll over for terrorists.

[Monty22]

"England does not surrender."

People were saying about Spain the other day too, and yet here we are.

[richardtavor]

I read someone's guess of the order of attack (reverse order of the Crusades,) and it kind of made sense:

1. Turkey (revenge for the destruction of the Ottoman Empire
2. Spain - to regain the Moors (or some would say Andalusia.
3. Italy - Crusader Capitol and seat of Heresy
4. Vienna - Islam stopped there in 1683 before engulfing Europe
5. France - Who cares?
6. England - support of the USA
7. USA - saving the best for last - (Maybe Kerry will convert.)
Spain has surely emboldened these terrorists, and it will be interesting to see how it plays out.

[FITZ]

Sweeping out the radical mosques would be a good place to start protecting London.

Exactly. England, the USA, and the rest aren't being attacked by armies showing up on their beaches, it't lack of control over who and why certain types are coming into the country and the access they are being given. Here our open borders could be our downfall. In WWII we didn't allow Nazis --- or other Germans --- to just come over as they pleased.

[tjwmason]

People were saying about Spain the other day too, and yet here we are.

People said it about England in 1940.

The major difference between England and Spain is that both our right-wing party (the Conservative Party) and our left-wing party (the Labour Party) are both united behind the War on Terror, and the invasion of Iraq. Even those politicians who did not support the invasion of Iraq have stated that we need to see the job through. There is nobody of any position at all in British politics who is advocating surrender. The rest of the world may fall away from the coalition (including if, and I hope it will not happen, Sen. Kerry gets elected the U.S.), but England will stand firm, as she has done for a thousand years.

England does not surrender. We did not surrender to the Nazis. We did not surrender to the I.R.A. We will not surrender to al Qa'eda. We do not surrender.

[CholeraJoe]

England is not a wimpy nation that will roll over for terrorists.

It's a far, far different nation than in 1940.