[PhilDragoo]

When asked whether removing Saddam Hussein was worth the cost, Mr. Kerry replied: "If there are not weapons of mass destruction — and we may yet find some — then this is a war that was fought under false pretenses." "So," said Time, "if we don't find WMD, the war wasn't worth the costs? That's a yes?" "No," said Mr. Kerry. "I think you can still — wait, no. You can't — that's not a fair question, and I'll tell you why. You can wind up successful in transforming Iraq and changing the dynamics, and that may make it worth it, but that doesn't mean [transforming Iraq] was the cause [that provided the] legitimacy to go."

And now we have Waffle Boy butt-kissing Khamenei who makes Irani democracy advocates "disappear" in prisons and torture chambers.

And here comes the Kerry response:

"It's none of your business."

Now we're talking: the dictatorship of the proletariat is too important to entrust to the little people.

Jihad al Querry: supported by foreign leaders Kim Il Sung, Ayatollah Khamenei, Syria's Assad, Cuba's Castro, to name a few.

Oh, and this guy:

[MeekOneGOP]

[Pan_Yans Wife]

Exactly. Kerry doesn't want the "little people" determining what American Foreign Policy should be. He is trying to position himself, before the election, as the alternative to Bush, that the world should turn to.

As someone said last night... "Why for the love of all things good, should foreign leaders have more say over America's policy, than American voters?"