You know after actually watching Chalabi on 60 Minutes the other night, it boggles my mind that a war was called for based on anything this man said. And after reading this list of what he claimed, it's even further amazing that anyone with half a brain cell would continue to believe him. I wonder, when whoever is still looking 20 years from now (probably still at our expense) and still doesn't find anything, will they still believe?
That defector complained in The Washington Post column that CIA interrogators in Ankara had treated him "dismissively" earlier that week.
Perhaps because those that are actually involved in intelligence moreso than PNAC talking points were able to see through him?