Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gila rancher arrested in cattle roundup dispute (NM)
Albuquerque KOB-TV4 ^ | March 15, 2004 | Associated Press

Posted on 03/16/2004 6:24:41 AM PST by CedarDave

Gila rancher arrested in cattle roundup dispute

Last Update: 03/15/2004 12:11:40 PM, By: Associated Press

(Silver City-AP) – A rancher whose cattle is being rounded up by the U.S. Forest Service in the Gila National Forest has been arrested and jailed.

Authorities say federal officers arrested Kit Laney around 7:30 p.m. Sunday.

He remained held without bond in the Dona Ana County Detention Center Monday.

A jail spokesman says charges include three counts of assault on a peace officer and resisting and obstructing arrest.

Laney and his wife, Sherry, had been running about 400 head of cattle on the 146,000-acre Diamond Bar allotment in the forest.

Federal courts repeatedly have ruled against the Laneys’ claim of private property to federal land where they graze their cattle.

A federal judge has ordered the cattle removed.

A Gila spokesman, Jim Payne, says 235 to 240 head of cattle have been rounded up so far.

(Copyright 2004 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: cattle; forestservice; landgrab; laney; propertyrights; ranching
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
KOAT-TV Channel 7 reports the assault occurred when Laney spurred his horse toward a LEO as his cattle were being taken. KOAT link here:

http://www.thenewmexicochannel.com/news/2924575/detail.html

1 posted on 03/16/2004 6:24:42 AM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; Carry_Okie; Jeff Head; Grampa Dave; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Property Rights BUMP
2 posted on 03/16/2004 6:26:14 AM PST by CedarDave (Canaries are to Spain, as Frogs are to France: Cute to look at, warble mindlessly,useless in a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
First read of the title had me beleiving the guy was a rancher of gila's. Why, i thought, do they taste like chicken?
3 posted on 03/16/2004 6:29:51 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance ("I" before "E" except in Budweiser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
"Laney and his wife, Sherry, had been running about 400 head of cattle on the 146,000-acre Diamond Bar allotment in the forest.

Federal courts repeatedly have ruled against the Laneys’ claim of private property to federal land where they graze their cattle."

Is Laney claiming the land (property) is his because he grazes his cattle there? The land in question appears to be in a National Forrest, not a private ranch. His claim to this land as his seems a bit specious on the face of it - is there something missing in the details?

4 posted on 03/16/2004 6:38:30 AM PST by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
A rancher whose cattle is being rounded up...

The writer of this piece are illiterate. The editor are also illiterate. Does they know there are such a thing as subject and verb agreement? Does they care? Does the managers at AP know they has morons working for them? This are not the only story I've seen written this way lately. I has gave up on AP.

5 posted on 03/16/2004 6:44:17 AM PST by Semi Civil Servant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance
Yep, I was envisioning a Gila monster stampede for a few moments there.
6 posted on 03/16/2004 6:49:24 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Bump
7 posted on 03/16/2004 6:53:42 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semi Civil Servant
This are not the only story I've seen written this way lately.

Just another way to diminish impact of an important story.

I mean, who's going to take a Gila rancher seriously?

8 posted on 03/16/2004 7:05:35 AM PST by ohmage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
From an earlier thread:

As the roundup proceeds, the Laneys are planning to take their case to the courts once again. The couple claims they have grazing and water rights in the Gila National Forest based on historical use that predates the national forest's creation. Opponents say the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected that same argument in 1999 in an earlier stage of this long-running fight that has made the Laneys darlings of the ranching community and conservative critics of the federal government.

Regrettable Roundup (Laney-Diamond Bar Ranch vs. US Forest Service, NM)

9 posted on 03/16/2004 7:18:01 AM PST by CedarDave (Canaries are to Spain, as Frogs are to France: Cute to look at, warble mindlessly,useless in a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
Feds confiscate rancher's cattle
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1096833/posts

10 posted on 03/16/2004 9:18:26 AM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
Albuquerque Journal article:

Tuesday, March 16, 2004

Rancher Arrested During Roundup

By Jeff Jones
Journal Staff Writer

An embattled southwestern New Mexico rancher, whose cattle are being removed from the Gila National Forest, has been arrested on suspicion of attacking federal law officers involved in the roundup.

Diamond Bar allotment rancher Kit Laney charged three officers while on horseback Sunday evening, yelling, "You son of a bitches" and other profanities, according to a criminal complaint filed against him Monday in federal court in Las Cruces.

Laney and his horse nearly trampled one officer near a temporary enclosure holding his cattle and another officer was knocked into a cattle guard, the complaint said. Laney also tried to tear down the enclosure and was sprayed with pepper spray by one of the officers, the complaint alleges.

Laney, 43, who has been on the losing end of a yearslong federal court battle to graze his cattle on U.S. Forest Service land, faces a felony charge of assaulting or resisting federal law officers and a misdemeanor count of interfering with the court order that resulted in the roundup of his cattle.

Laney remained in the Doña Ana County Detention Center late Monday afternoon, where he is being held without bond pending a detention hearing today.

Before Sunday, Laney maintained he would not physically interfere with the roundup. However, he also has said he thought the roundup, which began last week, amounts to theft.

Laney's ex-wife, Sherry Farr, who still ranches and lives with him, said during a brief telephone interview on Monday that she was not with Laney at the time of Sunday's incident. She said she doesn't believe he would have tried to forcibly remove his cattle from the federal enclosure.

"I haven't talked to Kit— I don't know his side," Farr said. "We've just been checking our cattle, riding through them, looking for sick ones, like we always do."

The criminal complaint against Laney said he approached a temporary cattle enclosure about 7:30 p.m. Sunday and charged three officers, spurring his horse to a fast gallop.

"The horse nearly trampled (one officer) as he quickly moved to the side," the complaint said, adding a second officer was struck in the arm and shoulder by Laney's horse and was knocked into a cattle guard.

"Whenever the officers approached Laney, he guided his horse in their direction, threatening to ram or trample them," the complaint said.

Laney also tried to remove the fencing of the enclosure and struck one of the wranglers with leather reins, the complaint said.

"Laney dismounted from the horse, and while continuing to yell and scream, attempted to pull down the enclosure," the complaint said. He allegedly shoved one officer several times during the incident. The complaint said Laney was warned to stop and calm down and was finally told he was under arrest after pushing a second officer.

After one of the officers sprayed Laney with pepper spray, four of them tried to put him on the ground, the complaint said. However, "Laney continued to resist by struggling and kicking with his spurred boots."

The Laney legal battle is now nearly a decade old. In 1995, the couple's Gila National Forest grazing permit expired. They didn't apply for a new permit or remove their cattle but instead sued the federal government, asserting a private-property right to graze their cows on the forest land.

The pair lost that case and were forced to remove their cattle and pay more than $50,000. But they moved cattle back into the forest last spring without a permit, maintaining they had a private-property right based on historical use predating the creation of the national forest.

The U.S. Attorney's Office has said federal judges have rejected that claim. The pair in December were found in contempt of prior court rulings and a judge ordered their herd off the federal land.

The roundup, being conducted by wranglers hired by the Forest Service, began March 9. A team of more than a dozen Forest Service law officers are providing round-the-clock security.

The assault charge against Laney carries a possible prison sentence of up to three years, the U.S. Attorney's Office said on Monday.

Forest Service spokesman Jim Payne said Monday that about 240 cattle have now been rounded up. Laney's herd is estimated at about 400 animals.

"This operation will go on for a number of weeks," Payne said. "You're looking at some pretty rough country up here."

Copyright 2004 Albuquerque Journal


11 posted on 03/16/2004 9:21:47 AM PST by CedarDave (Canaries are to Spain, as Frogs are to France: Cute to look at, warble mindlessly,useless in a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
'Is Laney claiming the land (property) is his because he grazes his cattle there? "

He claimshis family has owned, used, and improved the land since before NM statehood.
12 posted on 03/16/2004 9:33:31 AM PST by bk1000 (error 404- failed to get tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Link for ABQ Journal article above:

http://ABQjournal.com/paperboy/text/news/state/157783nm03-16-04.htm
13 posted on 03/16/2004 10:49:28 AM PST by CedarDave (Canaries are to Spain, as Frogs are to France: Cute to look at, warble mindlessly,useless in a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
14 posted on 03/16/2004 10:58:31 AM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BTT!!!!!
15 posted on 03/16/2004 11:17:56 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
Are you familiar with the Wayne Hage case? This is an identical case.
16 posted on 03/16/2004 4:03:42 PM PST by B4Ranch (Don't be so open-minded your brains fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
I bet this didn't even happen. These federal officers have been known to make this stuff up before.

Remember a few years back when Jack Ward Thomas was involved, and they were accusing ranchers of putting bombs in their trucks? I think they themselves planted them there to make the ranchers look bad.
17 posted on 03/16/2004 11:04:11 PM PST by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
"Are you familiar with the Wayne Hage case?"

No I'm not. What is the root underlying issues in the cases? Ownership of the land, use of the land, or a change in the designation of the land from "open-range" to national park.

I didn't think ownership accrued to anyone based solely on usage. Although in the western states that was once the way - something like how OK was settled.
18 posted on 03/17/2004 5:38:08 AM PST by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bk1000

He can claim as much as there are appeal-able courts to bring his unique and failing legal theories to.

19 posted on 03/17/2004 5:41:59 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
'He can claim as much as there are appeal-able courts to bring his unique and failing legal theories to.'

Not sure I understand you. Are you saying it's OK for the government to all of a sudden claim land his family has owned since before statehood? He has documents to prove his claims. I sure hope no one has an eye on YOUR property!
20 posted on 03/17/2004 5:51:42 AM PST by bk1000 (error 404- failed to get tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson