Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Passion's Jesus Tells J-Lo To Put Clothes Back On
Annanova ^ | 3/16/04

Posted on 03/16/2004 5:30:52 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar


 Ananova: 

Passion's Jesus Tells J-Lo To Put Clothes Back On

Jim Caviezel asked Jennifer Lopez to put some clothes back on before filming a raunchy sex scene with her.

The actor, now starring in Mel Gibson's Passion of Christ, appeared in Angel Eyes with J-Lo but didn't want to see her naked.

The newly married actor told Jen that he didn't want to offend his wife Kerri, reports the Daily Mirror.

"I want to respect her," he said. "The only bare breasts I want next to me in my life belong to my wife."

An astonished J-Lo ended up filming the scene wearing both her bra and a pair of knickers.

Jim, a devout Catholic, prays for 15 minutes every morning before working out and went to mass every day while filming the Passion of Christ.

But the paper reports he's not at all stuffy about his beliefs. When asked how he prepared for the role of Jesus, he joked: "I walked on my pool twice a day. It's hard to do."



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Agnes Heep
Exactly what I'd expect from Jesus

He is an actor, not Jesus.

Would you also expect Charleton Heston to part a sea instead of using the bridge?

21 posted on 03/16/2004 6:27:08 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
He is an actor, not Jesus.

I'm glad someone realizes that!

22 posted on 03/16/2004 6:28:18 AM PST by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
I would tend to agree on THAT point!

;>)

23 posted on 03/16/2004 6:34:12 AM PST by steplock (http://www.gohotsprings.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tiamat
Monte Cristo was pretty light entertainment, but it did have one terrific line..."Well then, its a smuggler's life for me and I would be glad to kill your friend, the maggot."

24 posted on 03/16/2004 6:39:56 AM PST by Rifleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
"I would have left the clothes off and felt really, really guilty about it."

LOL!!

25 posted on 03/16/2004 6:40:21 AM PST by Kennesaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
"ALL actresses and actors are whores."

And I thought it was just us lawyera..... :)
26 posted on 03/16/2004 6:45:49 AM PST by Lawdoc (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lawdoc
lawyera = lawyers (doh)
27 posted on 03/16/2004 6:46:53 AM PST by Lawdoc (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Prov 5:3-11 The lips of an adulteress drip honey, and smoother than oil is her speech; but in the end she is better as wormwood, sharp as a two-edged sword, her feet go down to DEATH, her steps lay hold of SHEOL,...keep your way FAR from her, do not go near the door of her house, ...lest your flesh and body are consumed..
Prov 6:25 Do not desire her beauty in your heart, nor catch you with her eyelids...can a man take fire in his bosom and his clothes not be burned... whoever touches her will not go unpunished..
28 posted on 03/16/2004 6:47:32 AM PST by Esther Ruth (God bless America - God Bless President George W Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theo
...but it's obvious he's still a sinner in need of grace and growth.

Who isn't?

29 posted on 03/16/2004 6:58:40 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jimt
Who isn't?

Valid point. I guess I'm just saying that while it's admirable that Caviezel made a step in the right direction, it's still quite deviant to 1) simulate a sex act with someone other than your spouse, 2) to do so publicly, 3) to encourage others to view that act.

I'm not innocent. I need a Savior. That said, Jim should know better than to participate in that scene.

30 posted on 03/16/2004 7:23:16 AM PST by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lil'freeper
... Jim said he asked the director to tone down the lone sex scene, also out of respect for his wife

If he really respected his wife, he wouldn't simulate sex with someone other than his wife, and encourage others to view that behavior.

I'm not a prude, but I think those of us who are Christians should expect more than this. Our standards needn't be so low....

31 posted on 03/16/2004 7:25:57 AM PST by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Theo
The papers report that the actor is not stuffy in his beliefs - I'm guessing they would report you are.
32 posted on 03/16/2004 7:33:25 AM PST by fml ( You can twist perception, reality won't budge. -RUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
lol, We all fall short of the Lord's grace!
33 posted on 03/16/2004 7:35:10 AM PST by threat matrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fml
The papers report that the actor is not stuffy in his beliefs - I'm guessing they would report you are.

I think you're right. It would dishonor my wife (and the Lord) for me to simulate sex with another woman, with my clothes on or off....

34 posted on 03/16/2004 8:06:49 AM PST by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lil'freeper
I agree. There was one scene. The "distance" between the two characters created an interesting tension.

Caviezel made this movie. Just about any actress could have filled the role of J-Lo.

Frankly, I saw the movie because of Caviezel.

35 posted on 03/16/2004 8:13:20 AM PST by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Solamente
Great movie! Jim Caviezel did a good job, one of my favorite movies!
36 posted on 03/16/2004 8:14:17 AM PST by StayoutdaBushesWay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theo
I hope you don't have such high expectations for the actress who played the Virgin Mary.

She might play a child abusing drug addict in her next movie.

If so, it won't harm me or my faith one bit. It won't harm God either. He knows they are actors.
37 posted on 03/16/2004 8:21:32 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tjwmason
I seem to remember a story (possibly apocryphal) that somebody once asked Blessed Pope John XXIII what he would do if a pretty young lady presented herself for communion with a low-cut top, his response was along the lines of 'enjoy the moment, and go to confession later'.

Highly, highly unlikely.

38 posted on 03/16/2004 8:24:49 AM PST by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tiamat
It was a good movie (Count of Monte Christo)until that ridiculous 'ball'
scene featuring a 'air balloon'. Hollywood sure knows
how to screw up a good book.
39 posted on 03/16/2004 8:30:56 AM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/615624/posts

Here is the original article here on FR, dating way back to 2002.
40 posted on 03/16/2004 8:51:09 AM PST by BaBaStooey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson