Skip to comments.
NC State Scientists Develop Breakthrough Internet Protocol
NC State Website ^
| 15 March 2004
Posted on 03/15/2004 9:42:22 AM PST by Future Snake Eater
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Any techies know anything about this technology?
To: Constitution Day
Go Pack!
2
posted on
03/15/2004 9:42:54 AM PST
by
Future Snake Eater
("Oh boy, I can't wait to eat that monkey!"--Abe Simpson)
To: Future Snake Eater
One can never be too young,
too rich,
or have too much bandwidth.
3
posted on
03/15/2004 9:44:55 AM PST
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: Future Snake Eater
I thought AOL already had it.

<|:)~
4
posted on
03/15/2004 9:46:25 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(Right about now)
To: Future Snake Eater
a new data transfer protocol for the Internet that makes todays high-speed Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) connections seem lethargic.So what? My cable modem service makes most DSL connections seem lethargic! ;O)
5
posted on
03/15/2004 9:53:06 AM PST
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
To: Future Snake Eater
Oh, yeh! Now we can get porn, I mean, info faster. Yeh!
6
posted on
03/15/2004 9:55:43 AM PST
by
TomGuy
(Kerry is left of liberal.)
To: Future Snake Eater
The comparison of BIC-TCP to DSL is specious; I presume that's the journalist talking.
It seems to be comparing the theoretical maximum performance of one protocol (no channel bitrate limitations) to another protocol over a known finite bitrate channel (although the article doesn't state its assumptions, by saying 'DSL' they must mean between 380 and 1500 Kb/s).
It's apples and a$$holes.
Of course, the writer of the article may have jumbled up the story so much that my interpretation is wrong.
7
posted on
03/15/2004 9:59:29 AM PST
by
Erasmus
To: newgeezer
Can you give me an idea of the speed difference between DSL and cable? We're in a new development, and we're not equipped for either yet, but I want to know if I should hold out for cable in any case. My home internet use is entirely recreational.
8
posted on
03/15/2004 9:59:53 AM PST
by
Mr. Bird
Pretty impressive for NC State, but the Terps have their number this year.
9
posted on
03/15/2004 10:00:55 AM PST
by
vollmond
To: newgeezer
Justa wait until they getta more subscribers, Monkey-boy!
+-<]B^)
10
posted on
03/15/2004 10:00:55 AM PST
by
Erasmus
To: billorites
Daryle Singletary sang,
I Ain't Never Had Too Much Fun To go along with your observation that there is never enough bandwith, I paste here, the chorus...
Too much fun? What's that mean?
It's like too much money, there's no such thing
It's like a girl too pretty, with too much class Being too lucky, a car too fast
No matter what they say I've done
I ain't never had too much fun
To: newgeezer
What kind of speeds are you getting with cable? I'm getting a little over 5 Mbit(640 KB/sec) down and .5 Mbit (65 KB/sec) up; with dsl.
12
posted on
03/15/2004 10:08:20 AM PST
by
M_i_G
To: Erasmus
Click here. Includes their white paper on it and code source.
Google is our friend.
13
posted on
03/15/2004 10:18:04 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Future Snake Eater
Very cool! BTTT!
To: vollmond
Yeah, yeah...although I feel a lot better since Duke lost to them, too.
15
posted on
03/15/2004 10:22:30 AM PST
by
Future Snake Eater
("Oh boy, I can't wait to eat that monkey!"--Abe Simpson)
To: M_i_G
The operative word in their sentence was "
high-speed" DSL; I conveniently left that out of my reply.
My friends with (slow) DSL are getting ~300 Kbps down; I'm getting 1.5 - 2.0 Mbps on cable.
16
posted on
03/15/2004 10:23:35 AM PST
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
To: Mr. Bird
If you're merely a surfer, the difference between DSL and high speed cable is minor. Which one to choose coome down to price and service. But, if you do a lot of FTP or downloading of files, DSL is generally faster due to a single, dedicated line.
17
posted on
03/15/2004 10:24:20 AM PST
by
rintense
To: newgeezer
I'm getting 1.5 - 2.0 Mbps on cable.You're getting THAT on a cable line? Wow. Wish I had that.
18
posted on
03/15/2004 10:25:05 AM PST
by
rintense
To: Future Snake Eater
Sign me up!
19
posted on
03/15/2004 10:31:59 AM PST
by
sopwith
(don't tread on me)
To: Mr. Bird
The tel. co. here has multi-tiered DSL service; the more you pay, the higher your speed.
Conceivably, DSL speed is independent of the number of subscribers in your area. Cable modem service is 'shared' so that if you have more neighbors online, your speed will degrade.
All I can say is that I've been on the service for over 2 years. Almost all my neighbors have it and, just a month ago, the whole system was upgraded so that the average bandwidth increased by ~2X.
Due to the telco's method of installation 15 years ago, DSL is not available in my 'hood. So, I'm glad cable service is as good as it is (it was bad before @Home went belly-up and Mediacom took over).
20
posted on
03/15/2004 10:33:29 AM PST
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson