Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oscar Honors A Nazi (Debbie Schlussel Introduces New Website)
Debbie Schussel.com ^ | 3/01/04 | Debbie Schlussel

Posted on 03/15/2004 1:49:26 AM PST by goldstategop

Oscar Honors a Nazi March 1, 2004

Hitler’s favorite propagandist has finally been rehabilitated.

At Sunday’s Academy Awards ceremony, Hollywood gave Leni Riefenstahl its kosher seal of approval.

As it does every year, the Oscars ceremony paid homage and tribute to all of the great actors, directors, composers, and other showbiz types who passed on in the previous year.

But along with recently deceased legends like Bob Hope, Gregory Peck, Donald O’Connor, Robert Stack, Buddy Hackett -- and even John Ritter, Ms. Riefenstahl was so honored.

Incredibly, the Hollywood audience in attendance gave loud applause in response to the televised photo and name of the German filmmaker who used concentration camp prisoners as extras.

Should Hollywood’s most important institution accord any recognition to this woman?

Riefenstahl claimed she was never a Nazi and didn’t sympathize with Hitler, but her actions and statements indicate otherwise. During the Nazi era, Riefenstahl:

was personally hand-picked by Hitler to make films glorifying Hitler, the Nazi party, and the infamous Nazi-run Berlin Olympics, at which Jews were excluded. (In 1932, Hitler told her, "Once we come to power, you must make my films.")

received financing for several of her films from Nazi propaganda officer Goebbels’ and his Ministry.

"employed" Gypsy prisoners of concentration camps as extras in her films, their last stop before deportation to Nazi death camps where half of them were exterminated.

Deleted the names of Jewish co-writers from her first film, "The Blue Light" when it was re-issued in 1938.

Riefenstahl "played a leading role in making propaganda for the most evil regime in human history," said Dr. Rafael Medoff, director of the David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies, in protesting the Academy recognition.

Would someone worthy of Academy Award tribute utter these famous Reifenstahlisms about Hitler?:

"Your deeds exceed the power of human imagination. They are without equal in the history of mankind. How can we ever thank you?" (1940 telegram from Riefenstahl congratulating Hitler on conquering Paris)

"I must confess that I was so impressed by you and by the enthusiasm of the spectators that I would like to meet you personally."

"That evening I felt that Hitler desired me as a woman" (regarding one of her many meetings with Hitler, though she denied they were lovers).

Was it ignorance, or just "the Academy’s" insistence on judging the art and not the artist?

If the standard is the latter, then Hollywood has a more lax standard for Nazis than for anti-Communists.

Remember Elia Kazan? He also died in 2003 and was part of the televised memorial honor roll that included Riefenstahl, Sunday.

But in 2002, actors like Nick Nolte, Ed Harris, Amy Madigan, and Ed Begley, Jr. protested the Lifetime Achievement Oscar that masterful director Kazan received. They sat on their hands, faces angry with rage, as Kazan took the stage to accept his award. They couldn’t forgive Kazan’s anti-Communist patriotism and his testimony before the House Committee on Un-American Activities at the height of the Cold War.

In left-wing Hollywood’s eyes, Kazan’s magnificent films, "A Streetcar Named Desire," "East of Eden," and, ironically, "Gentleman’s Agreement" (an ahead of its time film decrying anti-Semitism) were irrelevant. His talent wasn’t as important as his naming names of members of the Communist Party – even though the Venona Papers revealed that those he named were in fact Communists working to overthrow the U.S.

No such outrage from the entertainment industry’s liberal elite for the Nazi filmmaker who glorified the genocide of six million Jews and the murder of five million others.

No actors sitting on their hands. Just lots of applause.

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has a strange version of exclusivity.

The Wall Street Journal, Friday, detailed comedian Rob Schneider’s failed repeat bids for membership in the Academy. While its membership includes that "fine actor", Martin Lawrence, and now honors a Nazi propagandist, the Oscar purveyor is too highbrow to accept the likes of Schneider, whose movies make whopping multi-millions.

The Academy "will find it easier to endorse you for membership once you’ve turned in a strong performance . . . that showcases additional strengths."

"What the hell was I thinking, wanting to join an organization like that, anyway?" Schneider asked. "My thanks to the remarkably distinguished committee of actors for considering me (Ed Begley, Jr.?)."

If only he’d taken some money from Goebbels and added a "Heil Hitler" to the "Deuce Bigalow, Male Gigolo" sequel he’s now filming.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: academyaward; adolphhitler; agitprop; antiamerican; anticommunism; artisticfreedom; censorship; communism; communists; culturewar; debbieschlussel; doublestandard; eliakazan; hitler; hollyweirdleft; hollywooodcommunists; kazan; leniriefenstahl; lumpyriefenstahl; mccarthywasright; michaelmoore; oscar; oscarlovespropaganda; oscars; pc; politicallycorrect; prohitler; propaganda; prostalin; redmenace; riefenstahl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: goldstategop
This PC rewriting of history is getting on my nerves. We aren't allowed to mention achievements of a person if that person was associated with the Nazis in any way. No one seems to be able to look at things objectively anymore, in an academic fashion, and maybe pull lessons -- removed from their evil original context of course. So I'll say it: The only exception seems to be that we can admire the military men of the Nazi powers, such as Heinz Guderian and Irwin Rommel, separating them from those they served. Why only them? Okay, Rommel tried to kill Hitler, so maybe we give him a break on that, although he did it to save his country, not necessarily to save any Jews or Gypsies.

If we keep going in this attitude, a later generation that maybe abhors nuclear weapons may never allow the accomplishments of Oppenheimer, Teller and Einstein to be mentioned. We don't turn people into "non-persons" Soviet-style anymore, we just put a "Nazi animal" label on them and don't look any further.

21 posted on 03/15/2004 6:46:23 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
No such outrage from the entertainment industry’s liberal elite for the Nazi filmmaker who glorified the genocide of six million Jews and the murder of five million others.

Leni was far from the innocent she always claimed, but none of her film glorified the Holocaust. Now, I don't think anyone can read Mein Kampf and believe Hitler had anything but evil intentions. But, the fact is, the above statement is unfair and untrue.

22 posted on 03/15/2004 7:01:32 AM PST by sharktrager (Kerry is like that or so a crack sausage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
re: "Speer was a good architect and event organizer, and an unparalleled industrial manager,,,"

After the war, he left behind two mighty fine books:

Twenty Years in Spandau"
and
"Inside the Third Reich"

Which today gives us a look inside Nazi Germany. Anyone who reads his books will learn A LOT, especially about HOW IT ALL HAPPENED, and the wise,,, will learn how to keep it from ever happening again.

Since he survived the war, he was able to write those two books.

I think it is more important for future generations to LEARN from war criminals, instead of the present generation getting some gleeful joy from executing them.

That was Winston Churchill's opinion too.
23 posted on 03/15/2004 12:18:44 PM PST by RonHolzwarth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat; goldstategop
" PC rewriting of history is getting on my nerves."

It's getting on mine too. However here it's case where the Left love her because of controversy and anti-social overtones, and some because of her being a NAZI. We are judging her ethical and moral character in light of her specific film making ability. It is choice not PC.

"We aren't allowed to mention achievements moral scrutiny of a person if that person was associated with the Nazis in any way anyone who we say at any particular time, or not."

That is current PC speak.

24 posted on 03/17/2004 9:44:56 PM PST by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson