Skip to comments.
SUNDAY 2:48 pm Eastern on FOX NEWS: John Kerry, beware...Thomas Lipscomb has the story
dfu
| 3-13-04
| dfu
Posted on 03/13/2004 5:09:28 PM PST by doug from upland
ORIGINAL THREAD REGARDING APPEARANCE OF REPORTER TOM LIPSCOMB ON FOX NEWS
Reporter Tom Lipscomb wrote a bombshell piece of investigative journalism a few days ago that appeared in the NY SUN --- LIPSCOMB STORY - How Kerry Quit Veterans Group Amid Dark Plot
Lipscomb was supposed to be on FOX NEWS today but got bumbed because of the horrific terrorist bombing in Spain. He is rescheduled for Sunday at 2:48 pm Eastern.
For those who haven't paid attention, Lipscomb wrote a story about a meeting in Kansas City on Nov. 12-15, 1971. At that meeting of Vietnam Vets Against the War, there was a vote taken about assassinating U.S. senators who supported the war.
A very serious question has been raised. Was John Kerry at that meeting? His spokesman David Wade denies that Kerry was there, however, three witnesses have placed him there. On witness, Randy Barnes, has backtracked after he spoke to Lipscomb to say that he wasn't sure Kerry was there -- he could have been at the earlier meeting in St. Louis, and Barnes was confusing the two. Barnes is the head of Missouri Vets for Kerry.
It should be quite a day on FOX NEWS if Lipscomb does not get bumped again.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conspiracy; darkplot; kansascity; kerry; plot; scottcamil; senators; thomaslipscomb; tomlipscomb; vietgate; vvaw; wherewashe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: doug from upland
I hope its for real this time. This story needs to be out there.
2
posted on
03/13/2004 5:11:16 PM PST
by
dc-zoo
To: doug from upland
Even if true and Kerry was at this meeting, it will blow over in about a week given the lapdog mass media. If conclusive proof surfaces that Kerry was actually there when the vote was taken, it will be dismissed as a youthful indiscretion. If he was only at the meeting and no solid proof he was there when the issue was discussed, remember "I drank a lot of tea and had to pee" Al Gore?
3
posted on
03/13/2004 5:12:51 PM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(crime would drop like a sprung trap-door if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
To: doug from upland
As far as I'm concerned, Kerry is an admitted war criminal and it does not surprise me to learn he may be more brutal than I expected. I expect Kerry to be a brute, politically and otherwise.
4
posted on
03/13/2004 5:13:51 PM PST
by
Darheel
(Visit the strange and wonderful.)
To: Vigilanteman
I respectfully disagree. It will put him on the defensive big time. We will help force questions to be asked. Perhaps he will have to provide dental records like Dubya. :)
5
posted on
03/13/2004 5:17:52 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
To: doug from upland
What would Kerry's wrong doing be in all of this if the charges are true? Consorting with radicals? Or failing to turn them in? It appears that he did not agree with the murder plot.
6
posted on
03/13/2004 5:20:58 PM PST
by
ambrose
("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
To: ambrose
Failing to turn them in.
To: doug from upland
I don't understand why Drudge doesn't take this story and run with it.
8
posted on
03/13/2004 5:23:11 PM PST
by
dc-zoo
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
like the Sheeples are going to care that Kerry turned a blind eye to a murder plot.
they sure as hell didn't care when they had a president who actually engaged in murder.
9
posted on
03/13/2004 5:23:50 PM PST
by
ambrose
("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
To: doug from upland
There are several parts to the story. One is the claims that he was there at the meeting. Another is the claim that he resigned in writing a couple days before the meeting. What's that all about? Why the timing, and why the claim for a non-existant piece of paper? Why did one of his buds claim to be able to quote him, then suddenly forget whether he was even there?
10
posted on
03/13/2004 5:26:01 PM PST
by
js1138
To: doug from upland
BUMP!
11
posted on
03/13/2004 5:32:02 PM PST
by
The Mayor
(There is no such thing as insignificant service for Christ.)
To: doug from upland
Maybe we need the release of more than Kerry's service record. Maybe we need him to release his FBI file as well. Should be easy. He only has to ask Hillary.
To: doug from upland
thanks for keeping us updated.
To: doug from upland
I wonder how he voted?
To: Bonaparte
:-)!
LLS
15
posted on
03/13/2004 5:49:35 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(We point out Kerry's record and the facts, and they just THINK it's attack politics.)
To: doug from upland
After watching the Slime Clinton get away so many things, and being above the law. I don't think the chances will be anything positive that the Lurch will be touched. He'll beat the rap, regardless. Someone in Congress will have to make a lot of noise, and currently I don't hear a thing.
16
posted on
03/13/2004 5:51:06 PM PST
by
Joee
To: ambrose
Because he has proudly proclaimed not only his involvement in VVAW, he has (like Gore and the Inet) claimed to be instrumental in its creation.
He can't have it both ways, although he tries on almost every issue.
LLS
17
posted on
03/13/2004 5:52:18 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(We point out Kerry's record and the facts, and they just THINK it's attack politics.)
To: Joee
You forget the most important part of this equation. It is in Hillary Clinton's interest to see that Kerry is destroyed. If she thinks Bush can be beaten, she wants in.
18
posted on
03/13/2004 6:12:16 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
To: doug from upland
Yes, yes...
The real question is whether or not Kerry currently supports the assassination of Senators. After all, he is one. And we know how he flip-flops.
To: doug from upland
Don't get me wrong, I would love to see a "Monica" show up in the catsup factory. However, this situation does not appear strong to me, in fact I think it is very weak for its legal intent.
But out there somewhere, is the truth and a solid case against Kerry. He is too dirty to have it hidden for long. Let's pray it shows up in time.
20
posted on
03/13/2004 6:52:52 PM PST
by
Joee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson