[PatrickHenry]

Oh, and by the way, absolutely everything in the universe is proof of intelligence.

It's been said before: A proposal that professes to explain all relevant data, yet predicts nothing in particular, and which will accommodate any data that may hereafter be discovered, is a proposition that cannot be tested or falsified, has no genuine explanatory power at all, and therefore doesn't qualify to be termed a scientific theory.

[balrog666]

Start with what Patrick Henry said in #713.

Any hypothesis not grounded in facts, supportable with evidence, or falsifiable through testing is utterly meaningless.

[Fester Chugabrew]

A proposal that professes to explain all relevant data, yet predicts nothing in particular, and which will accommodate any data that may hereafter be discovered, is a proposition that cannot be tested or falsified, has no genuine explanatory power at all, and therefore doesn't qualify to be termed a scientific theory.

In most respects this description fits the Theory of Evolution to a "T."