[Amelia]

You know, I feel as if one of us is speaking English and the other is speaking Spanish. Some of the words are similar, but I don't think either of us is speaking so that the other comprehends the meaning.

That is to say, I really don't understand where you are going with your "argument".

[Fester Chugabrew]

I really don't understand where you are going with your "argument".

I'm not surprised.

If I would have a single, basic argument to put forth in the controversy it is that the General Sciences need to allow the inquiring mind an opportunity to challenge all information with which it is presented. Science is not preaching.

Attendant to that argument, WRT practical implications, I think it is acceptable to admit the possibility of intelligent design into the classroom without entering into specific religious teachings.

Lastly, as a point of personal observation, I have yet to see science and the Bible disprove each other. They fit together like hand in glove. Both make propositions to be accepted by faith, and both give evidence enough to be accepted as true.

[Doctor Stochastic]

Embarazada for example? Why does Babelfish give "embarazado"?