[Fester Chugabrew]

What part of mutation and selection requires us to assume anything other than the regular and unchanging processes of chemistry and physics?

I cannot think of anything, because regular and unchanging processes ipso facto imply intelligent design, therefore intelligent design is not an unreasonable element to ascribe to either mutation or selection.

[js1138]

ipso facto

I can't argue with a position that declares itself to be correct by definition. I would interest me, however, why you struggle so against pepople who devote their lives to unraveling those natural processes.

What has ID done to unravel the myseries, other than declare the problems unsolvable?