[RightWingNilla]

Give me 100 years, a good microscope, and some ordinary facts about chemistry and I'll show you how much in the way of facts and data can be gathered without the slightest deference or reference to evolution.

LOL. Whatever. Ill tell my advisor first thing tommorrow that weve been doing it all wrong. Some guy named Fester on the internet has it all figured out.

So when you go about collecting your facts, tell me what happens when you start regularly noticing things like dead retroviral DNA and fused chimp chromosomes? Conclude the all powerful, all knowing designer is trying to mess with us humans? Real intelligent.

[Fester Chugabrew]

I'll tell my advisor first thing tommorrow that we've been doing it all wrong.

No need to do that. Not everything is wrong. Collecting, identifying, and sorting data is important for us all, and evolutionists are very good at it.

So when you go about collecting your facts, tell me what happens when you start regularly noticing things like dead retroviral DNA and fused chimp chromosomes? Conclude the all powerful, all knowing designer is trying to mess with us humans? Real intelligent.

I'd cross that bridge when I came to it, but, as with life in general, when I observe things that are corrupt, or that die, it reminds me that this condition came about at a certain point in history when the first man answered the following question in the negative: "Did God say . . . .?"

But even without consideration for that part of the picture, one thing I would not do, and cannot do, even without a miscroscope, is discard the obvious notion that there is a heckuva lot of intelligent design around here, and that SOMEONE is behind it all.