What makes ID a non-credible idea is that it is impossible to frame an ID experiment in a way that makes it different from a mainstream experiment. There is simply nothing about ID that makes it different from science except its assertion that traditional science can't explain certain things. This is an assertion which, when made sufficiently specific, is constantly in retreat. What makes it maddening to scientists is that there is an implied moral imperative not to attempt to explain certain things. And I say that an ID experiment IS credible!
I'll even let you use your own dirt, or lifeforms or anything else that an Evolutionist thinks can be changed into something else.
Zap it, heat it, cool it, irradiate it, get it wetter, drier, hungrier or leaner: your choice.
Use YOUR intelligence to create YOUR design- using existing stuff.
If what you CLAIM is true is REALLY true, then a tremendous time compression of "E" will occur and mutations (helpful more than not) will also occur and your results can be published.