To: Calpernia
Late night ramblings:
Cal, you think things are going to pick up from here on out?
Loftus expressed the opinion tonight that AQ was unable to command a series of attacks, they were in disarray, and we wouldn't see anything for a while.
Of course, He also swore up and down Saddam was dead. I take things he says with a grain of salt, I think he has his agenda too. He also promotes the Bush-Nazi link and is a devoted Dem.
So, If I was AQ and wanted the world to crumble under it's own wieght, I would want a string of attacks in rapid succession, have people afraid to do anything, try to bring down the economic system. Spain, then within a few days Japan, Poland, France, Britain, then the US, in that order even. What do you think?
I don't know, when it comes right down to it, if the main goal is the destruction of the US, I would leave Europe completely alone. All attacking Europe is going to do is push them towards the US, no?
Judging by the millions marching in Spain today, and if more attacks across Europe produce the same reaction in their respective countries, it will be a bad place to be a muslim. It will be a bad world to be a muslim.
I know 9/11 changed a lot of American minds, mine being one of them. Why do that to a Europe you already have in your back pocket via Iran?
They don't really think they can win anything this way, do they?
16 posted on
03/12/2004 9:05:05 PM PST by
rickylc
To: rickylc
It will be a bad world to be a muslim. So???
17 posted on
03/12/2004 9:07:51 PM PST by
null and void
(Because he couldn't find the key, he broke into song...)
To: rickylc
The logic isn't as easy to follow as much since most of the first tier was disrupted. Now the 'enablers' are working through a lot of 2nd tier commands. They aren't as groomed for this responsibility.
So more of a liberal/commie flavor is starting to show through versus masking through the Islamic religion.
London was a listed target. The US was/is suppose to be hit after London. Odd thing though, a communication was scene Wednesday night with Las Vegas listed next to London. So is London a false flag? Was Las Vegas listed for another reason?
It gets harder to tell. Especially when our computers keep experiencing problems when we try to find out.
27 posted on
03/12/2004 9:21:55 PM PST by
Calpernia
(http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson