Skip to comments.
TV News Runs Hot for
Kerry, Cold for Bush
MediaChannel.org ^
Posted on 03/12/2004 3:35:51 PM PST by Howlin
NEW YORK, March 11, 2004 - Mainstream news organizations may "filter" the news, as President George W. Bush claimed late last year, but not to omit good stories from their Iraq coverage, but to broadcast more negative news about the president himself, according to a report released today by MediaChannel.org and Media Tenor.
The report reveals a strong negative cast to ABC, CBS and NBC news coverage of the president thus far in 2004. Meanwhile, Senator John Kerry, Bush's certain opponent for November, has received more positive coverage by the same three networks.
According to data compiled for MediaChannel.org by international media monitoring firm Media Tenor, network news broadcasts in January and February contained on average nearly three times more negative news statements about President Bush than about Senator John Kerry.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediachannel.org ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abccbsnbc; broadcastnews; imshocked; journalism; journalists; liberalmedia; media; mediabias; noreally; stoptheexcerpts; suchasurprise; wankers; wateriswet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: jwalsh07
So I wasn't dreaming? NPR? NBC? Holy crap!
61
posted on
03/12/2004 4:40:10 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Charter Member of the Incredible Interlocking Institutional Power!!!!)
To: shrinkermd
I agree with you about their venerability.... The Bush campaign is just beginning to take actions and start laying the foundations for their campaign. They will make mistakes at times along the way and hopefully they will correct them. The hard core of each party isn't going to be swayed by any ads as you know but I suspect most of the undecideds aren't paying that much attention to things at the present time.
Seven Months is many eternities in the realm of political elections.
62
posted on
03/12/2004 4:42:31 PM PST
by
deport
("These guys are the most crooked, you know, lying group I have ever seen. It's scary," Kerry said.)
To: GotDangGenius
Row, row, row your car
Gently down the stream
Mary Jo, Mary Jo, Mary Jo, Mary Jo
Never heard you scream
63
posted on
03/12/2004 4:44:26 PM PST
by
arasina
(So there.)
To: jwalsh07
This is NOT a right wing website. If anything it is a lefty site. The "Advisors" to the source are mostly college professors (and we know which way they vote) - and Danny Glover and Patricia Ireland.
64
posted on
03/12/2004 4:45:51 PM PST
by
jackbill
To: Howlin
Some things never change. Media bias is one of them.
65
posted on
03/12/2004 4:47:34 PM PST
by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold.)
To: Howlin
Say it ain't so
66
posted on
03/12/2004 4:48:27 PM PST
by
satchmodog9
(it's coming and if you don't get off the tracks it will run you down)
To: Howlin
67
posted on
03/12/2004 4:49:47 PM PST
by
Lexinom
To: jackbill
Yep maybe one of them investment type things that sell shares.... Who knows. I could see Rumsfeld being interested in a ranch but not Rather.....
You would think, especially after Saddam's capture, that Rumsfeld could pack it in, go out on top and settle down in that ranch in Taos, N.M., that he co-owns with, among others, Dan Rather, TIME reports.
68
posted on
03/12/2004 4:59:31 PM PST
by
deport
("These guys are the most crooked, you know, lying group I have ever seen. It's scary," Kerry said.)
To: Lexinom
ROFL!
69
posted on
03/12/2004 5:12:57 PM PST
by
arasina
(So there.)
To: jwalsh07; Howlin
Well, sometimes the contrarian that I am, I have a different view. Rather than the networks being hopelessly biased, I think the numbers generally reflect the play of events during the subject period, although no doubt at the margins there is bias. Specifically, I would expect that given that while Kerry was demolishing his opponents, Bush during the period gave only an average SOU speech, and performed only fair in his interview with Russert, the Kay report came out, the unemployment numbers remained sluggish and the deficit projections ballooned, nothing much positive came out about Iraq (now something has with the place signing off on a draft constitution) and team Bush was keeping its powder dry until Kerry had a lock on the nomination, one would expect Kerry would have a much more favorable press than Bush during the subject period.
It will be interesting to see that stats for the next two months given that Kerry has hit a negative patch: Kerry gave a suck victory speech (too long, too droning, too cliched and too mean spirited), Kerry refused to back off his calling Republicans liars and crooks per an intrusive mike, team Bush has opened up on Kerry, and unsettling stuff is now being released on Kerry in a drip, drip fashion.
70
posted on
03/12/2004 7:05:11 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Torie
Yeah, yeah, I know all that.:-}
But we have something to wack them over the head with in the months to come which will have a leavening effect on their inborn bias.
This is a chess game amigo. LOL
71
posted on
03/12/2004 7:08:46 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
(We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
To: Howlin
Thanks, Howlin.
I'm shocked here. SHOCKED!
/sarcasm
72
posted on
03/12/2004 7:30:32 PM PST
by
Humidston
(Two Words: TERM LIMITS)
To: Howlin; Miss Marple
Speaking of Kerry .. ads.. and raising money
Have you seen this
John Kerry Raises $10 Million in 10 Days Online
$10 miliion in 10 days huh?? .. Why does this remind me of Dean?
I wonder how local those funds are?
Oh and check out the new rapid-response portion Kerry has .. kind of reminds of how the Clinton's worked .. now Kerry is calling Bush a flip flop?
73
posted on
03/12/2004 11:47:56 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
To: Mo1
I wonder how many foreign ISPs are linked to that donor base?
74
posted on
03/12/2004 11:50:06 PM PST
by
Texasforever
(I apologize in advance)
To: Texasforever
I have a feeling it would be more then just a few .. thanks to Moveon.org/PAC
75
posted on
03/13/2004 12:33:22 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
To: Mo1
You're back! Took almost an hour break I see.
But unfortunately I'm bored and I'm going to make a snack and try and find something on TV to watch.
Or fortunately for those that bear the brunt of my wrath! lol
76
posted on
03/13/2004 1:01:11 AM PST
by
Fledermaus
(Do I have to resign from the VRWC to join the new RAM: Republican Attack Machine???)
To: Fledermaus
*L* .. yes, I was doing a little reading elsewhere
What's that saying .. know thy enemy :0)
77
posted on
03/13/2004 1:07:48 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
To: Howlin
Bump
78
posted on
03/13/2004 1:20:00 AM PST
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
To: Mo1
I find it interesting how quickly they had an ad ready to go. I don't know about ad production, and maybe I am a bit paranoid, but is it possible to get an ad that sophisticated ready in ONE DAY? Could it be that once again we have a mole in the ad agency?
To: Miss Marple
I don't know about ad production, and maybe I am a bit paranoid, but is it possible to get an ad that sophisticated ready in ONE DAY? Could it be that once again we have a mole in the ad agency? I'm not an expert in this area .. but the Kerry Ad seemed like a bunch of cut and paste to me .. so I would think they could put it together pretty fast
HOWEVER ... the speed in which they were about to get it out to the stations across the country and getting word of it in the news media was pretty fast ...
Actually .. it was REALLY fast in my opinion
It's possible about a mole
80
posted on
03/13/2004 2:59:56 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson